Method for the control of receiver synchronization in a mobile phone

• US 5,276,691 A
• Filed: 01/21/1992
• Issued: 01/04/1994
• Est. Priority Date: 01/21/1992
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Nokia Mobile Phones UK Limited (Nokia Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Nokia Mobile Phones UK Limited (Nokia Corporation)
• Inventors: Kivari, Raimo
• Primary Examiner(s): Nguyen, Hoa T.
• Application Number:
  US07/823,159
• Time in Patent Office: 714 Days
• Field of Search: 371/47.1, 371/46, 371/42, 371/5.4, 371/20.1, 371/20.4
• US Class Current: 714/798
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 7/0083 taking measures against momentary loss of synchronisation, e.g. inhibiting the synchronisation, using idle words or using redundant clocks
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 7/042 Detectors therefor, e.g. correlators, state machines digital correlators in general G06F17/15

Abstract

A receiver synchronization control in signalling messages in TACS/AMPS system in a mobile phone is disclosed. In order to avoid unnecessary setting of hunt mode operation, if the received synchronization pattern is not congruent with the correct reference pattern, the received pattern is checked in a bit-by-bit manner so as to reveal occasional bit errors of one or two bits, which may appear although the receiver is in synchronization. A further check may be conducted by shifting a reference pattern mask by one or at the most two bits in either direction, whereafter rechecking to reveal either fully correct pattern or rechecking for only one or two bits error can be performed.

Claims

1. A method for determining the cause of an incorrect synchronization word pattern in a received mobile telephone signal having a succession of frames, comprising the steps of:

(1) receiving binary data frames having a synchronization pattern;

(2) a first step of comparing bit-by-bit the received synchronization pattern with a predetermined synchronization pattern;

(3) accepting the received synchronization pattern as correct if the first step of comparing determines no more than two bits of the received synchronization pattern differ from the predetermined synchronization pattern;

(4) if the first step of comparing determines that the received synchronization pattern is not accepted, a second step of comparing bit-by-bit the received synchronization pattern with a phase shifted version of the predetermined synchronization pattern; and

(5) accepting the required synchronization pattern as correct, but out of synchronization, if the second step of comparing determines no more than two bits of the received synchronization pattern differs from the phase shifted version of the predetermined synchronizing pattern, otherwise indicating a loss of received synchronization and not accepting the synchronization pattern as correct.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein when the first step of comparing does not accept the received synchronization pattern as correct, initiating a hunt mode for synchronization in the next frame.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein when the second step of comparing accepts the received synchronization pattern, a synchronization loss is indicated and a hunt mode for synchronization is initiated immediately.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein when the second step of comparing does not accept the received synchronization pattern, a hunt mode for synchronization is initiated immediately.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the second step of comparing includes using a phase shifted version of the predetermined synchronization pattern that is phase shifted no more than two bits.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the second step of comparing includes:

(a) phase shifting the version so as to lead by one bit;

comparing the one bit leading phase shifted version with the received synchronization pattern;

if the received synchronization pattern is not accepted;

then

(b) phase shifting the version so as to lag by one bit;

comparing the one bit lagging version with the received synchronization pattern;

if the received synchronization pattern is not accepted;

then

(c) phase shifting the version so as to lead by two bits;

comparing the two bit leading phase shifted version with the received synchronization pattern;

if the received synchronization pattern is not accepted;

then

(d) phase shifting the version so as to lag by two bits;

comparing the two bit lagging phase shifted version with the received synchronization pattern; and

regardless of whether the received synchronization pattern is accepted, immediately initiating the hunt mode.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein the second step of checking includes:

(a) phase shifting the version of the predetermined synchronization pattern so as to lead same by one bit;

comparing the one bit leading phase shifted version with the received synchronization pattern;

if the received synchronization pattern is not accepted;

then

(b) phase shifting the version so as to lead by two bits;

comparing the two bit leading phase shifted version with the received synchronization pattern;

if the received synchronization pattern is not accepted;

then

(c) phase shifting the version so as to lag by one bit;

comparing the one bit lagging version with the received synchronization pattern;

if the received synchronization pattern is not accepted;

then

(d) phase shifting the version so as to lag by two bits;

comparing the two bit lagging phase shifted version with the received synchronization pattern; and

regardless of whether the received synchronization pattern is accepted immediately initiating the hunt mode.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second steps of checking will accept the received synchronization pattern only if one or fewer differences are detected.