System and method for assessing an individual's task-processing style

• US 5,326,270 A
• Filed: 08/29/1991
• Issued: 07/05/1994
• Est. Priority Date: 08/29/1991
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Introspect Technologies, Inc., Shari Marihugh
• Original Assignee: Introspect Technologies, Inc., Shari Marihugh
• Inventors: Ostby, Paul S., Ostby, David L., Marihugh, Shari
• Primary Examiner(s): Apley, Richard J.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Cheng, Joe H.
• Application Number:
  US07/751,548
• Time in Patent Office: 1,041 Days
• Field of Search: 434/118, 434/219, 434/236, 434/307, 434/322, 434/323, 434/234, 434/335, 434/362, 434/365, 364/419, 364/578, 340/712, 340/825.31, 385/100, 385/118, 385/152, 385/154, 385/155, 385/156, 385/159, 385/161, 385/600, 385/927
• US Class Current: 434/362
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 19/0053 Computers, e.g. programming
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/04 characterised by modifying the teaching programme in response to a wrong answer, e.g. repeating the question, supplying a further explanation
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 9/00 Simulators for teaching or training purposes for the use of weapons F41; computing aspects G06; protocols for games, networked simulations or virtual reality H04L67/131
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 706/927 Education or instruction
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 715/961 Operator interface with visual structure or function dictated by intended use

Abstract

A method and apparatus for evaluating the task-processing style of an individual by presenting that individual with a simulated situation and recording the individual'"'"'s responses while resolving the situation. A subject undergoing the assessment is asked to assume the responsibilities of an Assistant Superintendent of Parks, replacing an individual who has unexpectedly left that position. The subject is first trained in the use of a touch-sensitive screen display for accessing data that may be useful in fulfilling the responsibilities of the simulated position and for providing input data used in the exercise. Each action by the subject undergoing the assessment is recorded in a raw data stream, along with the time that it occurred, and is statistically analyzed with respect to several parameters that define the subject'"'"'s task-processing style. These parameters are useful in determining whether an individual is suitable for a job and for other assessment purposes, or can be used for training a subject to improve the subject'"'"'s ability and efficiency in dealing with tasks.

Claims

1. A computer implemented method for assessing a task-processing style of an individual, comprising the steps of:

a. defining a simulated situation for the individual with scenario data that are presented to the individual on a computer-controlled display;

b. making available resource data to the individual on the computer-controlled display so that the individual can optionally select and review the resource data, the resource data being, at least in part, usable by the individual to resolve the simulated situation;

c. recording each access of the resource data made by the individual, and the responses produced by the individual to resolve the simulated situation, thereby producing raw subject data;

d. statistically analyzing the raw subject data to produce a statistical database in which are compiled the accesses made by the individual of the resource data and the responses of the individual to resolve the simulated situation; and

e. using the statistical database, generating a report that generally characterizes the task-processing style of the individual in respect to a plurality of preselected parameters that are determined according to a set of predefined rules.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of training the individual before assessing the individual'"'"'s task-processing style, to assist the individual in teaming to use the computer-controlled display and in entering specific response data in resolving the simulated situation.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of making available resource data comprises the step of providing the individual with a plurality of screens that are each selectively displayed on the computer-controlled display, each screen presenting the resource data.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of making available resource data comprises the step of providing the individual with a plurality of graphic icons that are displayed on the computer-controlled display, so that when selected by the individual, each graphic icon causes a different aspect of the resource data to be displayed on the computer-controlled display.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the available resource data are organized as a plurality of data types that are presented to the individual on the computer-controlled display as a plurality of choices from which the individual can select view at least one data type on the computer-controlled display at a time.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein selection of one of the plurality of data types by the individual causes additional choices of data to be displayed on the computer-controlled display for selection by the individual, each selection by the individual comprising an access of the resource data that is recorded in a sequential order that it occurs and is characterized as an input to the individual in producing the raw subject data.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising the step of providing a plurality of choices on the computer-controlled display from which the individual can select at least one choice to develop at least a partial resolution of the simulated situation, each such choice being characterized as an output by the individual in producing the raw subject data.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the step of statistically analyzing the raw subject data includes the step of determining a sequential order, frequency, and time durations of the input and the output, and wherein the step of generating the report comprises the step of defining a relative order, frequency, and time duration of the input and the output by the individual.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the output comprises a plurality of types of production, and wherein the step of statistically analyzing the raw subject data further includes the step of determining the relative proportion of output for each type of production.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the types of production include conceptual, selective, and implementive, and wherein the step of generating the report further comprises the step of defining the types of production exhibited by the individual in resolving the simulated situation and the relative proportion of each type.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of presenting a plurality of options organized as an array on the computer-controlled display, and recording a sequential order in which each of the options is selectively accessed by the individual, the sequential order of such accesses comprising a portion of the raw subject data.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the step of statistically analyzing the raw subject data includes a determination of the individual'"'"'s methodicalness, and wherein the step of generating a report comprises the step of defining the methodicalness of the individual as one of the preselected parameters.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of statistically analyzing the raw subject data includes the step of determining an average number of accesses of the resource data before the individual made a decision, to determine how decisive and selective the individual is.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein generating the report includes the step of defining a decisive-selective characteristic for the individual as one of the preselected parameters.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein a resolution of the simulated situation comprises a plurality of loosely defined components, and wherein the step of statistically analyzing the raw subject data includes the step of determining an extent to which sequential responses by the individual in resolving the simulated situation either were directed to a specific component of the resolution, thereby indicating that the individual exhibits a specific implementation method, or were generally directed to different components, indicating that the individual exhibits a general implementation method.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the step of generating the report includes the step of defining a general-specific characteristic for the individual as one of the preselected parameters.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of generating the report comprises the step of producing a graphic representation of a corresponding task-processing characteristic of the individual that is one of the preselected parameters.

18. A computer for assessing an individual'"'"'s task-processing style, comprising:

i a. a central processing unit;

b. memory means for storing;

i. instructions that control the central processing unit;

ii. scenario data defining a simulated situation that is to be resolved by the individual;

iii. resource data, of which, at least a portion is useful in resolving the simulated situation; and

iv. response data that represent at least a part of the individual'"'"'s resolution of the simulated situation;

c. display means, connected to the central processing unit, for displaying;

i. the scenario data;

ii. specific resource data selectively accessed by the individual; and

iii. specific response data provided by the individual in resolving the simulated situation;

d. entry means, electrically connected to the central processing unit, for enabling the individual to select the specific resource data for display on the display means and for entering the specific response data into the memory means;

e. statistical analysis means, for analyzing the specific resource data selected by the individual and its sequential order of selection, and for analyzing the specific response data, producing a statistical database that is stored by the memory means; and

f. report generation means for generating a report from the statistical database that defines the individual'"'"'s task-processing style in respect to a plurality of preselected parameters in accord with predefined rules.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the instructions that control the central processing unit comprise a training session for the individual implemented before assessing the individual'"'"'s task-processing style for insuring the individual knows how to use the entry means and how to select from a plurality of options presented on the display means.

20. The system of claim 18, wherein the scenario data are organized as a plurality of data types presented to the individual on the display means as a plurality of choices from which the individual selectively chooses using the entry means, the data type selected by the individual comprising a portion of the specific response data stored by the memory means.

21. The system of claim 20, wherein selection of one data type by the individual causes the central processing means to display additional choices of data on the display means, and wherein selection of such data by the individual comprises a selective access of the resource data that is stored in the memory means in the sequence in which it occurs, for analysis by the statistical analysis means.

22. The system of claim 21, wherein the statistical analysis means determine a sequential order and a frequency with which the resource data are selected by the individual and with which the specific response data are provided by the individual, in producing the statistical database, and the report generation means use the statistical database to define a relative order, frequency, and time durations with which the resource data are accessed and specific responses are made by the individual.

23. The system of claim 22, wherein the responsive data are characterized in the statistical database as comprising a plurality of types of production, including conceptual, selective, and implementive production, and using the statistical database, the report generation means define a relative proportion of each type of production exhibited by the individual in resolving the simulated situation.

24. The system of claim 18, wherein one of the preselected parameters used by the report generation means in defining the individual'"'"'s task-processing style is methodicalness, which is determined by the statistical analysis means as a function of an order and a pattern with which the individual accesses choices presented in an array on the display means.

25. The system of claim 18, wherein the statistical analysis means analyze accesses of the resource data by the individual to determine an average number of accesses made prior to the individual making a decision that comprises a specific response to produce the statistical database, and the report generation means use the statistical database to define a decisive-selective characteristic for the individual as one of the preselected parameters.

26. The system of claim 18, wherein a resolution of the simulated situation comprises a plurality of loosely defined components, and wherein the statistical analysis means determine an extent to which sequential responses by the individual in resolving the simulated simulation either were directed to a specific component, indicating a specific implementation method, or were directed to different components, indicating a general implementation method, and using the statistical database, the report generation means define a general-decisiveness characteristic of the individual as one of the preselected parameters.

27. The system of claim 18, wherein the display means comprise a touch-sensitive screen display, and wherein the scenario data and the resource data are presented to the individual on the touch-sensitive screen display, the entry means comprising means for detecting a portion of the touch-sensitive screen display touched by the individual to make a selection among a plurality of choices displayed thereon to selectively control and access the scenario data and the resource data.

28. The system of claim 18, wherein at least a portion of the specific response data comprises graphical icons that are selected and positioned by the individual on the display means using the entry means, the selection and arrangement of the icons comprising at least a portion of the resolution of the simulated situation.