Method for calibrating a single point impact sensor

• US 5,337,260 A
• Filed: 07/12/1993
• Issued: 08/09/1994
• Est. Priority Date: 07/12/1993
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Vector Corrosion Technologies Incorporated (Vector Corrosion Technologies)
• Original Assignee: Ford Motor Company
• Inventors: Spangler, Leland J.
• Primary Examiner(s): COSIMANO, EDWARD R
• Application Number:
  US08/089,179
• Time in Patent Office: 393 Days
• Field of Search: 73/488, 364/424.05, 364/556, 364/571.02, 364/571.04
• US Class Current: 702/88
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 21/0132 responsive to vehicle motion parameters , e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value

Abstract

A method for calibrating an impact sensor enables calibration to take place after sensor manufacture is completed. During calibration, the sensor undergoes an acceleration while vehicle specific calibration values are programmed into sensor memory for different incremental rates of acceleration. Calibration verification checks to verify that the relationship between acceleration and sensor output is linear. The calibration also includes a hysteresis test by comparing output values when incrementally increasing the acceleration to corresponding acceleration values while incrementally decreasing acceleration. The calibration method may also include calculating a response time for a self-test circuit that can be stored in memory and later used during self-tests of the sensor.

Claims

1. A method for calibrating an impact sensor that controls the activation of a passenger restraint mechanism in a vehicle, the method comprising the steps of:

providing, within the sensor, a sense element that is responsive to acceleration, means for generating an electrical signal having a value that is a function of the sense element response, and an activation decision circuit having a counter means for determining if the electrical signal is indicative of a passenger restraint activation worthy event;

applying an acceleration to the sense element between a rate of zero acceleration and a full scale acceleration;

incrementally adjusting the acceleration applied to the sense element;

programming the generating means to adjust the value of the electrical signal within a predetermined range for each incremental acceleration value; and

verifying the calibration of the impact sensor.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the verifying step comprises the steps of:

measuring the electrical signal value at zero acceleration;

measuring the electrical signal value at full scale acceleration;

measuring the electrical signal value for at least one acceleration that is between zero acceleration and full scale acceleration; and

verifying that the relationship between the electrical signal value and acceleration is substantially linear.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the verifying step comprises the steps of:

measuring the electrical signal value at zero acceleration;

incrementally increasing the acceleration;

measuring the value of the electrical signal at each increment;

establishing a bias point based upon the electrical signal value at zero acceleration;

computing a least squares line based upon the measured values and having its intercept through the bias point; and

computing a difference between each measured value and the least squares line wherein the impact sensor is out of tolerance if the difference exceeds a predetermined value, thereby indicating a non-linear relationship between the electrical signal value and the acceleration sensed by the sense element.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of providing security codes within the generating means in the impact sensor to thereby prevent unauthorized tampering.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the programming step further comprises programming the generating means while the sense element is still undergoing acceleration.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

providing a self-test circuit;

simulating acceleration of the sense element at a first time;

determining a second time at which the electrical signal is indicative of a passenger restraint activation worthy event;

calculating the difference between the first time and second time; and

programming the self-test circuit with the difference.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprising completely manufacturing the sensor prior to conducting the calibration.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of programming the activation decision circuit to indicate a passenger restraint activation worthy event when the value of the electrical signal reaches a predetermined value.

9. The method of claim 4 wherein the programming step comprises loading a second value into the activation decision circuit that is equal to the total size of the counter means minus the desired value of the electrical signal, to thereby indicate a passenger restraint activation worthy event when the counter means reaches the second value within a predetermined period of time.

10. A method for calibrating an impact sensor that controls the activation of a passenger restraint mechanism in a vehicle, the method comprising the steps of:

providing, within the sensor, a sense element that is responsive to acceleration, means for generating an electrical signal having a pulse density which is a function of the sense element response, and an activation decision circuit having a counter for determining if the electrical signal is indicative of a passenger restraint activation worthy event;

applying an acceleration to the sense element between a rate of zero acceleration and full scale acceleration;

incrementally adjusting the acceleration applied to the sense element;

programming the generating means to adjust the pulse density of the electrical signal within a predetermined range for each incremental acceleration value; and

verifying the calibration of the impact sensor.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the verifying step comprises the steps of:

measuring the pulse density of the electrical signal at zero acceleration;

measuring the pulse density of the electrical signal at full scale acceleration;

measuring the pulse density of the electrical signal for at least one acceleration that is between zero acceleration and full scale acceleration; and

verifying that the relationship between the electrical signal pulse density and acceleration is substantially linear.

12. The method of claim 10 wherein the verifying step comprises the steps of:

measuring the pulse density of the electrical signal at zero acceleration;

incrementally increasing the acceleration;

measuring the pulse density of the electrical signal at each increment;

establishing a bias point based upon the pulse density of the electrical signal at zero acceleration;

computing a least squares line that is based upon the measured pulse densities and having its intercept through the bias point; and

computing a difference between each measured value and the least squares line wherein the impact sensor is out of tolerance if the difference exceeds a predetermined value, thereby indicating a non-linear relationship between the electrical signal pulse density and the acceleration sensed by the sense element.

13. The method of claim 10 further comprising completely manufacturing the sensor prior to conducting the calibration.

14. The method of claim 10 wherein the programming step further comprises programming the generating means while the sense element is still undergoing acceleration.

15. The method of claim 10 further comprising the steps of:

providing a self-test circuit;

simulating acceleration of the sense element at a first time;

determining a second time at which the electrical signal is indicative of a passenger restraint activation worthy event;

calculating the difference between the first time and second time; and

programming the self-test circuit with the difference.

16. The method of claim 10 further comprising the steps of:

incrementally increasing the acceleration applied to the sense element up to a predetermined maximum value;

noting the pulse density at each increment;

incrementally decreasing the acceleration applied to the sense element;

comparing the pulse density at each increment while decreasing acceleration to the pulse density at corresponding increments noted during increasing acceleration and noting a difference in pulse density wherein the impact sensor is out of tolerance if the difference in pulse densities exceeds a predetermined value.

17. The method of claim 10 further comprising the step of programming the activation decision circuit to indicate a passenger restraint activation worthy event when the pulse density of the electrical signal reaches a predetermined value.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein the programming step comprises loading a second value into the activation decision circuit counter that is equal to the total size of the counter minus the desired number of pulses in the electrical signal, to thereby indicate a passenger restraint activation worthy event when the counter reaches the second value within a predetermined period of time.