Control system for vehicle safety device

• US 5,363,303 A
• Filed: 03/18/1994
• Issued: 11/08/1994
• Est. Priority Date: 03/13/1991
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Bosch Electronics Corporation (Robert Bosch GmbH)
• Original Assignee: Zexel Corporation (Robert Bosch GmbH)
• Inventors: Kaneko, Hideyuki, Takeuchi, Kunihiro
• Primary Examiner(s): Teska, Kevin J.
• Assistant Examiner(s): LOUIS JACQUES, JACQUES H
• Application Number:
  US08/215,962
• Time in Patent Office: 235 Days
• Field of Search: 364/424.05, 364/424.01, 364/426.05, 364/426.04, 364/426.01, 364/424.03, 307/10.1, 307/236, 307/121, 307/360, 307/9.1, 280/735, 280/734, 280/741, 340/436-438, 340/514, 340/429, 340/467, 340/457, 180/274, 180/281, 180/282, 180/286, 180/271
• US Class Current: 701/45
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 21/0132 responsive to vehicle motion parameters , e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 21/0133 by integrating the amplitude of the input signal
• CPC Class Codes: G01P 21/00 Testing or calibrating of apparatus or devices covered by the preceding groups

Abstract

A vehicle safety device control system includes a plurality of acceleration sensors. Test pulses are supplied to the plurality of acceleration sensors. In order to judge whether or not each acceleration sensor has failed each acceleration sensor is checked for whether or not it outputs a signal that corresponds to the test pulse. The signal from the failed acceleration sensor is not used when a determining if a collision has occurred; only the signals from the other acceleration sensors are used in this determination.

Claims

1. A control system for a vehicle safety device comprising:

(a) a plurality of acceleration sensors, each of which outputs a signal representative of acceleration and deceleration of a vehicle;

(b) test pulse output means for outputting test pulses to said plurality of acceleration sensors so that when one of said plurality of acceleration sensors receives the test pulse, the other acceleration sensor does not receive the test pulse;

(c) failure judgment means for checking said signal output from the acceleration sensor which received said test pulse to judge whether or not this acceleration sensor has failed; and

(d) acceleration evaluation means for continuously calculating with the signals output from those acceleration sensors which have not received the test pulse to judge whether or not a vehicle collision has occurred, and then to output a trigger signal to a vehicle safety device which said acceleration evaluation means judges that the collision has occurred.

2. A control system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said plurality of acceleration sensors include first and second acceleration sensors,

said acceleration evaluation means including main calculation means which calculates when said failure judgment means judges that both of said first and second acceleration sensors are normal, said main calculation means comprising:

first and second integrating means, first and second comparison means, and trigger signal output means, wherein said first integrating means integrates a signal from said first acceleration sensor to obtain a first integral value, and adds a signal from said second acceleration sensor to said first integral value to renew said first integral value during the failure judgment of said first acceleration sensor, said second integrating means integrates said signal from said second acceleration sensor to obtain a second integral value, and adds said signal from said first acceleration sensor to said second integral value to renew said second integral value during the failure judgment of said second acceleration sensor, said first comparison means compares said first integral value with a threshold level, said second comparison means compares said second integral value with said threshold level, and said trigger signal output means outputs said trigger signal when said first comparison mans judges that said first integral means exceeds said threshold level and said second comparison means judges that said second integral value exceeds said threshold level.

3. A control system as claimed in claim 2, wherein said acceleration evaluation means further comprises first and second auxiliary calculation means, said first auxiliary calculation means integrates said signal from said first acceleration sensor when said failure judgment means judges that said second acceleration sensor has failed, compares this integral value with said threshold level, and then outputs said trigger signal when tis integral value exceeds said threshold level, and said second auxiliary calculation means integrates said signal from said second acceleration sensor when said failure judgment means judges that said first acceleration sensor has failed, compares this integral value with said threshold level, and then outputs said trigger signal when this integral value exceeds said threshold level.

4. A control system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said plurality of acceleration sensors include first and second acceleration sensors, and said test pulse output means outputs test pulses to said first and second acceleration sensors, alternately.