Adaptive control of EGO sensor output

• US 5,375,415 A
• Filed: 11/29/1993
• Issued: 12/27/1994
• Est. Priority Date: 11/29/1993
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Ford Global Technologies, LLC (Ford Motor Company)
• Original Assignee: Ford Motor Company
• Inventors: Logothetis, Eleftherios M., Hamburg, Douglas R.
• Primary Examiner(s): Dolinar, Andrew M.
• Application Number:
  US08/158,330
• Time in Patent Office: 393 Days
• Field of Search: 123/694, 123/695, 123/691, 123/681, 123/682, 123/683, 123/684, 123/696, 60/274, 60/276
• US Class Current: 60/274
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/1476 Biasing of the sensor

Abstract

An engine air/fuel feedback control system adjusts the engine air/fuel ratio in response to a modified output of an exhaust gas oxygen sensor. A sensor output is compared to a reference at its nominal midpoint to develop a two-state signal indicating operation rich or lean of stoichiometry. This two-state or step output is shifted towards the peak efficiency window of a catalytic converter by pumping current through a sensor electrode in response to an error signal derived from a downstream sensor. Shifts in the upstream sensor amplitude caused by current pumping are corrected by a correction factor which is adaptively learned during a test cycle.

Claims

1. An engine air/fuel control method for aligning a step change in output of an exhaust gas oxygen sensor which corresponds to a predetermined air/fuel ratio with the efficiency window of a catalytic converter positioned in the engine exhaust, comprising the steps of:

generating an error signal related to a difference between the predetermined air/fuel ratio and the converter efficiency window;

shifting the step change and the corresponding predetermined air/fuel ratio towards the converter efficiency window by pumping current through an electrode of the sensor to reduce said error signal;

generating a correction factor related to a change in peak-to-peak excursion of said sensor output during a test period in which engine air/fuel operation is first forced sufficiently rich and then forced sufficiently lean of a preselected air/fuel ratio to saturate the EGO sensor output in its respective rich indicating state and lean indicating state; and

correcting said sensor output with said correction factor to reduce variations in said peak-to-peak excursion caused by said pumping of said current.

2. The method recited in claim 1 further comprising the steps of generating a feedback control signal in response to a comparison of a reference value to said sensor output and adjusting fuel to the engine in response to said feedback control signal.

3. The method recited in claim 2 wherein said step of adjusting fuel in response to said feedback control signal is disabled during said test period.

4. The method recited in claim 1 wherein said pumping current is held at a constant value during said test period.

5. The method recited in claim 2 wherein said step of generating said correction factor further comprises the step of determining an actual voltage shift in said sensor output from said reference value by subtracting said reference value from a midpoint between said peak excursions during said test period.

6. The method recited in claim 5 wherein said step of generating said correction factor further comprises the step of generating a correction ratio of said actual voltage shift to an estimated voltage shift.

7. The method recited in claim 6 wherein said estimated voltage shift is estimated from engine speed and load and said constant pumping current during said test period.

8. The method recited in claim 7 wherein said step of generating said correction factor further comprises a step of multiplying said correction ratio times a second estimated voltage shift.

9. The method recited in claim 8 wherein said second estimated voltage shift is related to said pumping current.

10. The method recited in claim 9 wherein said second estimated voltage shift is also related to engine speed and engine load.

11. An engine air/fuel control method for aligning a midpoint in peak-to-peak excursion of a step change in output of an exhaust gas oxygen sensor which occurs at a predetermined air/fuel ratio with the efficiency window of a catalytic converter positioned in the engine exhaust, comprising the steps of:

controlling the engine air/fuel ratio in response to a comparison of the sensor output with a reference value;

generating an error signal related to a difference between the predetermined air/fuel ratio and the converter efficiency window;

shifting the step change and the predetermined air/fuel ratio towards the converter efficiency window by pumping current through an electrode of the sensor to reduce said error signal;

generating a correction factor related to a difference between a midpoint between the peak-to-peak amplitude of the sensor output and said reference value during a test period in which engine air/fuel operation is first forced sufficiently rich and then forced sufficiently lean of stoichiometric combustion to saturate the sensor output; and

correcting the sensor output with said correction factor to reduce variations in the peak-to-peak excursion caused by said pumping of said current.

12. The method recited in claim 11 wherein said correcting step aligns said reference value with said midpoint.

13. The method recited in claim 11 wherein said engine air/fuel ratio controlling step is also responsive to said error signal.

14. The method recited in claim 11 wherein said correction factor generating step occurs during a test period in which both said pumping current is held constant and said step of controlling the engine air/fuel ratio is forced to be independent of said sensor output.

15. An engine air/fuel control method for aligning a midpoint in peak-to-peak excursion of a step change in output of an exhaust gas oxygen sensor which occurs at a predetermined air/fuel ratio with the efficiency window of a catalytic converter positioned in the engine exhaust, comprising the steps of:

generating an error signal related to a difference between the predetermined air/fuel ratio and the converter efficiency window;

feedback control of the engine air/fuel ratio in response to a feedback variable derived by integrating a difference between the sensor output and a reference value, said feedback control also being responsive to said error signal;

shifting the step change and the predetermined air/fuel ratio towards the converter efficiency window by pumping current through an electrode of the sensor to reduce said error signal;

disabling said feedback and holding said pumping current at a constant value during a test period;

forcing engine air/fuel operation lean for a predetermined time and rich for a preselected time during said test period;

generating a correction ratio of a difference between a midpoint of the peak-to-peak excursion of the sensor output and said reference value to a stored value related to said pumping current during said test period; and

correcting the sensor output with said correction ratio to reduce offsets in the peak-to-peak excursion caused by said pumping current.

16. The method recited in claim 15 wherein said correcting step further comprises the steps of predicting a voltage offset induced by said pumping current and multiplying said predicted voltage offset by said correction ratio to generate a voltage correction and adjusting the sensor output with said voltage correction.

17. The method recited in claim 15 wherein said test period predetermined time and preselected time are substantially equivalent.

18. The method recited in claim 16 wherein said step of predicting said voltage offset comprises a look up table addressed by said pumping current and engine speed and engine load.