Method and apparatus for controlling a brake valve based on sensed conditions and a model of the braking system

• US 5,405,182 A
• Filed: 10/26/1992
• Issued: 04/11/1995
• Est. Priority Date: 04/26/1990
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Pollock, Vande Sande & Priddy LLP
• Original Assignee: Knorr-Bremse AG (Estate of Heinz Hermann Thiele)
• Inventors: Ewe, Ulrich, Saumweber, Eckart
• Primary Examiner(s): Graham, Matthew C.
• Application Number:
  US07/938,270
• Time in Patent Office: 897 Days
• Field of Search: 303/3, 303/7, 303/15, 303/20, 303/117.1, 303/70, 303/33, 303/59
• US Class Current: 303/15
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 13/665 the systems being specially adapted for transferring two or more command signals, e.g. railway systems B60T13/662 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 17/228 for railway vehicles

Abstract

The electronic brake control simulates by electronic means various real changes over time of the pneumatic pressures in a braking system, in particular the pressure in the main air pipe of the train, the pressure in the R containers of the individual wagons and the pressure in the individual brake cylinders. When the brakes are released, the values are determined from these model values and the actually backfed air volume, from which values the pilot control pressure for a relay valve can be increased in order to release the brakes more rapidly. The train model determines, by an adaptive learning method at the end of a brake releasing process, values for the volume of the main air pipe and the R containers of the train, so that the train model adapts itself to the actually existing train.

Claims

1. A process for operating a compressed air brake having an electropneumatic brake valve with an actuator to adjust a setpoint (UREF) for the brake pressure, a relay valve attached to a main air pipe (HL), operated by a pilot control pressure from said brake valve, at least two air supply containers attached to the main air pipe (HL), and a first and a second sensor for measuring the volume of air fed into the main pipe and for measuring the air pressure in the main pipe, comprising the following steps:

(a) measuring the volume of the air (Σ

V) fed into the main air pipe (HL) when releasing the brake and generating a first air volume signal in response thereto;

(b) measuring the air pressure (HList) in the main air pipe (HL) and generating a main air pipe air pressure signal in response thereto;

(c) modifying the pilot control pressure (A-pressure) in response to the first air volume signal and the main air pipe air pressure signal;

(d) generating electric simulation signals, which simulate the change in pressure over time of at least the main air pipe pressure (HL_m) and a pressure (R_m) in said air supply containers on the basis of a predetermined function of said first air volume signal and said main air pipe air pressure signal (HList);

(e) generating an electric air backfeed signal (VSZUG), which corresponds to the volume of air still to be backfed during a brake releasing process on the basis of said electric simulation signals representing a change in main air pipe pressure and air supply container pressures (HL_m and R_m), of a reference signal (UREF) derived from the actuator and of stored value signals (AHL, AR), which correspond to an assumed volume of air in the main air pipe and the air supply container;

(f) generating a correction value signal (UBER), which determines an amount by which the pilot control pressure set to release the brake is to be increased, on the basis of the electric backfeed signal (VSZUG);

(g) comparing said first air volume signal and said electric air backfeed signal; and

,

(h) correcting said stored value signals (AHL, AR) if said first air volume signal and electric air backfeed signal are not the same.

2. Process for adaptive brake control, as claimed in claim 1, further comprising following the decrease in the overpressure (from U1 to U2), generating a check-back pressure (dP-kon), and comparing the check-back pressure with a pressure (dp) in a backfeed branch for the main pipe line (HL), and generating an alarm signal when the check-back pressure (dP-kon) for a specified duration is less than the measured pressure (dp).

3. Process for adaptive brake control, as claimed in claim 1, further comprising linearly reducing in time the signal representing the pressure change of the main air pipe pressure (HL_m) along a slope depends on the stored value signal (AHL) which is selected so the simulated pressure drop (HL_m) at the start of a braking process has less of a slope than the actual pressure drop it represents (HL-actual), and the simulated pressure drop (HL_m) is established as the maximum value of the actual pressure change and the pressure change dropping linearly in time.

4. Process for adaptive brake control, as claimed in claim 3, further comprising storing the minimum value (HL-min) of the simulated pressure change (HL_m) that is obtained during a braking process is stored.

5. Process for adaptive brake control, as claimed in claim 4, wherein to determine the simulated pressure (R_m) in the air supply containers, a value (UREFge) of the braking demand signal that is stored at the start of the braking process minus the simulated (HL) pressure drop (HL_m) is compared with a stored value, which corresponds to the maximum possible pressure (C-max) in individual brake cylinders of the brake system, increasing the smaller of these two compared values (C-desired) along a specified time gradient, and at each increase, decreasing the simulated air supply container pressure (R_m) by a second specified amount.

6. Process for adaptive brake control, as claimed in claim 5, wherein the minimum value (R-min) of the simulated air supply container pressure (R_m) is stored in a memory.

7. Process for adaptive brake control, as claimed in claim 3, further comprising determining during a brake releasing process the volume of air actually backfed into the main air pipe by measuring the differential pressure (dp) at a flow restrictor, and comparing said differential pressure (dp) with a calibration curve, and comparing the volume of air (dV) backfed into the main air pipe per unit of time with a spedfled minimum value (dV-min), and adding the volumes of air (dV) backfed per unit of time as a function of said comparison of said volumes of air.

8. Process for adaptive brake control, as claimed in claim 7, wherein during a brake releasing process determining whether the demanded brake pressure (UREF) and the simulated main air pipe pressure (HL_m) is less than the simulated air supply container pressure (R_m), and weighting the volume of air (dV) backfed per unit of time with a value which corresponds to the stored value (AHL) for the assumed air volume of the main air pipe when the simulated main air pipe pressure (HL_m) is less than the simulated air supply container pressure (R_m), which increments (dHL) for the increase in the simulated main air pipe pressure per unit of time are determined, and wherein, when the simulated main air pipe pressure (HL_m) is less than the simulated air supply container pressure (R_m), weighting the values of the volume of air (dV) backflowing per unit of time with two weighting factors (AHL, AR), whose total sum corresponds to the assumed volume of the main air pipe and the air supply containers, and determining incremental values for the joint pressure increase of the main air pipe pressure and of the air supply container pressure from said volume of air (dV) backflowing per unit of time.

9. Process for adaptive brake control, as claimed in claim 1, further comprising during a brake releasing process, subtracting the current value of the simulated main air pipe pressure (HL_m) from the smaller value of a current brake demand signal (UREF) and a brake demand signal (UREFge) stored at the start of the braking process, and multiplying a resulting difference by a first constant factor corresponding to the stored value (AHL) for the assumed volume of the main air pipe, and subtracting the minimum brake demand signal and the difference from the simulated air supply container pressure (R_m) and multiplying the result by a constant factor and a factor which corresponds to the assumed volume of the air supply containers (AR), and adding the two resulting products to form a value (VSZUG), which represents the volume of air still to be backfed.

10. Process for adaptive brake control, as claimed in claim 9, wherein two limits (U1 and U2) of overpressure during a brake releasing process are determined from the value (VSZUG) for the volume of air still to be backfed.

11. Process for adaptive brake control, as claimed in claim 10, further comprising increasing the overpressure to be added to the pilot control pressure during the releasing process, linearly in time at a first gradient to the first limit (U1), and maintaining said overpressure for a specified duration (tu), and subsequently decreasing said overpressure at a second gradient linearly in time to the second limit (U2), and then decreasing said overpressure at a third gradient to the zero value, the third gradient being so small that the brake control valves of the individual wagons do not respond to the subsequent drop in pressure.

12. Process for adaptive brake control, as claimed in claim 11, further comprising determining the specified duration (tu) is determined as a function of the actuation (brake step and duration of the brake step) of the brake actuator.

13. Process for adaptive brake control, as claimed in claim 1, further comprising following a completed brake releasing process, checking whether the difference between the actually backfed volume of air and a determined volume of air (VSZUG) still to be backfed is equal to zero, and when this condition is not fulfilled, values (V_HL0.5, V_HL1.5, V_R0.5, V_R1.5, V_ZUG0.5, V_ZUG1.5) which are corrected as a function of the sign of said difference, are determined to specify a quantity of air to obtain the set pressure (UREF) the corrected values are compared with the value (VSZUG) for the volume of air still to be backfed, and modifying the stored values (AHL and/or AR) based on the comparison of the value of the determined volume of air still to be backfed with the corrected values for the next braking and brake releasing cycle.

14. Process for adaptive brake control, as claimed in claim 13, further comprising generating an alarm signal when modifications of at least one of the assumed volumes of the main air pipe and air supply containers exceed a specified value.

15. Adaptive air brake control apparatus comprising an electropneumatic brake valve with an actuator to adjust a brake pressure setpoint, including:

a main air pipe;

a relay valve attached thereto;

at least two air supply containers attached to said main air pipe;

a first sensor for measuring the air volume fed into said main air pipe when releasing the brake; and

,

a second sensor for measuring the air pressure in said main air pipe, said electropneumatic brake valve producing a pilot control pressure for controlling said relay valve and said air brake control apparatus modifying said pilot control pressure in response to output signals of both of said sensors;

further comprising;

(a) electronic train simulation means generating electrical signals which simulate the change in pressure over time of at least the main air pipe pressure and the pressure in the air supply containers on the basis of a predetermined function of the output signals of the sensors;

(b) memory means storing values which correspond to an assumed volume of air in the main air pipe and the volume of air in said air supply containers;

(c) calculating means which generate a signal which corresponds to the volume of air to be backfed during a brake release process on the basis of the electric simulation signals and said values stored in said memory means;

(d) correction means which determines an amount signal by which the pilot control pressure to release the brake is to be increased on the basis of the signal from said calculating means;

(e) comparison means which following a brake release compares the value of the measured backfed volume and the value of the said volume of air to be backfed; and

,

(f) learning means which, in dependence on an output signal from said comparing means, modifies the stored values in said memory means