Method and apparatus for truth detection

• US 5,406,956 A
• Filed: 02/11/1993
• Issued: 04/18/1995
• Est. Priority Date: 02/11/1993
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Brainwave Science Incorporated, Central Intelligence Agency, Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency, Forensic Science Laboratory Delhi, Francis Luca Conte, Prime Technology Incorporated (General Dynamics Corporation), Government of New Zealand, Government of the United States of America, Harvard University, Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, National Center For Credibility Assessment, Republic of India, The Republic of South Africa, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Federal Bureau of Investigation (United States Department of Justice), University of Canterbury, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign (University of Illinois), University of Washington, United States Navy (U.S. Department Of Defense)
• Original Assignee: Francis Luca Conte
• Inventors: Farwell, Lawrence A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Sykes, Angela D.
• Application Number:
  US08/016,215
• Time in Patent Office: 796 Days
• Field of Search: 128/731-732
• US Class Current: 600/544
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/164 Lie detection
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/291 for electroencephalography [EEG]
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/377 using evoked responses
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/4035 Evaluating the autonomic nervous system

Abstract

A method of detecting information stored in the brain of a subject includes presenting to the subject in oddball series Probe, Target, and Irrelevant stimuli. The Probe stimuli are relevant to a situation under investigation; the Irrelevant stimuli are not; and the Target stimuli are identified to the subject as being noteworthy, and in response to which the subject is instructed to perform a task. The Target stimuli like the Probe stimuli are relevant to the situation under investigation. The method also includes detecting electrical brain responses for each of the stimuli; analyzing the responses for uncovering an event related brain potential; and comparing the Probe responses with the Target responses to determine whether the subject recognizes the Probes, and comparing the Probe responses with the Irrelevant responses to determine whether the subject does not recognize the Probes. Three exemplary headbands are disclosed for positioning electrodes at preferred locations on the subject'"'"'s scalp for obtaining electrical responses therefrom.

Claims

1. A method of detecting concealed information stored in a human brain of a subject, which information is not including affiliation with a particular group of people, familiarity with a particular realm of knowledge, or expertise in a particular field, comprising:

a) Informing said subject of stimuli to be presented that are relevant to said class;

b) Presenting to said subject in oddball series said relevant stimuli of step (a) and stimuli irrelevant to said class, and Target stimuli requiring said subject to perform a task;

c) Recording electrical brain activity subsequent to the presentation of each of said stimuli for determining corresponding event related brain potential responses; and

d) Comparing the responses to the relevant and Target stimuli, and to the relevant and irrelevant stimuli for determining knowledge or lack of knowledge, respectively, of said relevant stimuli in said subject.

2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the subject performs a reaction time task in response to each stimulus during step (b).

3. A method of detecting whether or not someone is telling the truth, comprising:

a) asking questions of the individual;

b) noting the individual'"'"'s answers;

c) asking the individual, in addition to the answers to the questions, to report continuously in a stream-of-consciousness fashion, on their ongoing thought processes;

d) measuring electrical brain activity during said thought processes; and

e) comparing the electrical brain activity to standards for activity when a subject is known to be accurately reporting on his/her spontaneous mental activity and for activity when an individual is known to be speaking something that is at variance with his ongoing mental activity.

4. A method of detecting whether a subject is telling the truth comprising:

(a) asking questions of the subject and asking the subject to report continuously in a stream-of-consciousness fashion on his/her spontaneous mental thoughts,

(b) recording electrical brain activity during step (a), and

(c) comparing the electrical brain activity to standards for activity when a subject is known to be accurately reporting his/her spontaneous mental thoughts and for activity when a subject is known not to be reporting his/her spontaneous mental thoughts.

5. A method of detecting information stored in a brain of a subject comprising:

presenting to said subject in oddball series stimuli including;

Probe stimuli relevant to a specific situation under investigation for effecting in said subject an event related brain potential when said subject has knowledge thereof;

Irrelevant stimuli not relevant to said situation; and

Target stimuli identified to said subject as being noteworthy, and in response to which said subject is instructed to perform a task, said Target stimuli like said Probe stimuli being relevant to said situation under investigation;

detecting an electrical brain response from said subject in response to each of said stimuli;

analyzing said electrical brain responses for uncovering said event related brain potential therein; and

comparing said electrical brain responses from said Probe stimuli with said Target stimuli for determining whether said subject recognizes said Probe stimuli, and comparing said Probe stimuli with said Irrelevant stimuli for determining whether said subject does not recognize said Probe stimuli.

6. The method in claim 5 wherein the subject is required to perform a reaction time task in response to each stimulus, distinguishing between Target stimuli of which he has been informed by the researcher and Probe and Irrelevant stimuli of which he has not been so informed, the subject performing a first task for the former, and a second, different task for the latter.

7. The method in claim 6 wherein said event related brain potential, is an electrically positive P300 component, and the comparison is on the basis of said P300 component.

8. The method in claim 5 wherein the analysis and comparison steps include:

a) iteratively sampling from the known relevant Probe, unknown relevant Target, and irrelevant stimuli, with replacement, with a sample size in each case equal to the total number of trials of that type in the original data;

b) averaging the samples of each trial type in each iteration;

c) repeatedly, once each iteration, comparing the average unknown relevant Probe brain response with the average known relevant Target brain response and the average irrelevant response;

d) tallying the times that the unknown relevant Probe response is more similar to the Irrelevant brain response than to the known relevant Target brain response; and

e) comparing the tally with a criterion to determine whether the subject is "guilty"(knowledgeable) or "innocent" (not knowledgeable).

9. The method in claim 8 wherein the comparison step includes correlation.

10. The method in claim 9 wherein the grand average waveform is subtracted from each of the averages before computing the correlation.

11. The method in claim 8 wherein the comparison step includes one of:

a) comparing area, defined as the sum of the points in the time range of the P300;

b) comparing base to peak, defined as the most positive point in the time range of the P300, minus the average of the points in the baseline prior to the stimulus onset; and

c) comparing peak to peak, defined as the most positive point in the time range of the P300, minus the most negative point post-stimulus and prior to the time range of the P300.

12. The method in claim 5 wherein:

a) the comparisons of the electrical brain responses for the Probe, target, and Irrelevant stimuli are computed on the basis of a single average of each type, without iterative sampling; and

b) the results of the comparisons of single averages are compared with criteria for determining whether the subject does or does not recognize the Probe stimuli.

13. The method in claim 12 wherein differences and ratios of each of the comparisons of each of the trial types are also computed.

14. The method in claim 13 wherein the results of the different comparisons are combined using multiple regression.

15. The method in claim 5 wherein reaction times in performing the first and second tasks are determined and analyzed for determining recognition of said Probe stimuli.

16. The method in claim 5 wherein the comparison step provides a single index, which is then compared with a criterion to determine whether the subject is "innocent" or "guilty."

17. A method according to claim 5 wherein said information stored in said subject brain regards a particular event, and both said Probe and Target stimuli are relevant to said event whereas said Irrelevant stimuli are not.

18. A method according to claim 5 wherein said information stored in said subject brain does not regard a particular event but rather is indicative of a class including affiliation with a particular group, familiarity with a particular realm of knowledge, or expertise in a particular field, and wherein said Probe stimuli are known to said class and unknown outside said class.

19. A method of detecting information stored in a brain of a subject comprising:

presenting to said subject stimuli including;

rare, Target stimuli identified to said subject as being noteworthy, and in response to which said subject is instructed to perform a task; and

frequent, non-Target stimuli including Probe stimuli preselected as being possibly relevant to a situation under investigation, and Irrelevant stimuli not relevant to said situation;

detecting an electrical brain response from said subject in response to each of said stimuli;

analyzing said electrical brain responses for uncovering any event related brain potentials; and

comparing said electrical brain responses for each of said non-Target stimuli with other non-Target stimuli and with said Target stimuli for uncovering an event related brain potential due to said non-Target stimuli which is similar to an event related brain potential for said Target stimuli and in contrast to non-Target stimuli not eliciting an event related brain potential.

20. A method according to claim 19 wherein said event related brain potential is a P300 component.

21. A method according to claim 20 wherein said non-Target stimuli include multiple choice stimulus sets for eliciting said P300 component in response to one stimulus of each set.

22. A headband for measurement of electrical brain activity from a scalp of a subject, said scalp having frontal, central, parietal, left mastoid, and right mastoid locations, said headband comprising:

a flexible band having first and second opposite ends and a center portion therebetween, and being sized to surround said scalp for joining together said first and second ends;

a flexible overflap having first and second opposite ends, with said overflap first end being integrally joined to said band center portion, and being sized to extend over said scalp frontal, central, and parietal locations for joining together said overflap second end to said band first and second ends;

first means for releasably joining together said band first and second ends;

second means for releasably joining together said overflap second end with said joined together band first and second ends;

a plurality of spaced-apart female electrode sites fixedly joined to said band and to said overflap for alignment with said scalp frontal, central, parietal, left mastoid, and right mastoid locations upon placement of said headband on said subject scalp; and

a plurality of electrode wires joined to respective ones of said electrode sites.

23. A headband according to claim 22 wherein said electrode wires extend from said electrode sites and internally through said overflap, and have proximate ends joined to a connector disposed adjacent to said overflap second end.

24. A headband according to claim 22 wherein said first and second joining means include complementary pairs of Velcro hook and loop pads joined to said band and overflap.

25. A headband according to claim 22 wherein said electrode sites for said frontal, central, and parietal scalp location are disposed along said overflap, and said electrode sites for said left and right mastoid locations are disposed along said band.

26. A headband according to claim 22 further comprising:

a flexible secondary crossbar attached to said overflap at an intermediate portion thereof and disposed generally parallel to said band, said secondary crossbar having first and second opposite distal ends; and

wherein said electrode sites for said frontal, central, and parietal scalp locations are disposed along said overflap, and said electrode sites for said left and right mastoid locations are disposed along said secondary crossbar adjacent to said first and second ends thereof, respectively; and

further wherein said secondary crossbar is sized for positioning said first and second ends thereof underneath said band when said band and overflap are positioned over said subject scalp.

27. A headband according to claim 26 wherein said secondary crossbar is attached to said overflap at said electrode site for said parietal scalp location, and said electrode sites for said left mastoid, parietal, and right mastoid locations are colinearly spaced apart along said secondary crossbar.

28. A headband according to claim 22 further comprising:

a plurality of spaced apart flaps fixedly joined at one edge thereof to said band and said overflap; and

third means for releasably joining together each of said flaps with respective ones of said band and said overflap so that each of said flaps is individually repositionable on said band and said overflap.

29. A headband according to claim 28 wherein each of said flaps is disposed on said band and said overflap behind a respective one of said electrode sites for adjusting mobility thereof.

30. A headband according to claim 29 wherein:

said first and second joining means include complementary pairs of Velcro hook and loop pads joined to said band and overflap; and

said third joining means include complementary pairs of Velcro hook and loop pads joined to said flaps and said band and overflap.

31. A headband according to claim 22 including a plurality of electrodes removably affixed to respective ones of said female electrode sites.