Failure determination method for O.sub.2 sensor

• US 5,423,203 A
• Filed: 07/16/1993
• Issued: 06/13/1995
• Est. Priority Date: 07/16/1992
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Mitsubishi Jidosha Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
• Original Assignee: Mitsubishi Jidosha Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
• Inventors: Matsumoto, Takuya, Hashimoto, Toru, Yoshida, Yasuhisa, Namiki, Koichi
• Primary Examiner(s): Williams, Hezron E.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Larkin, Daniel S.
• Application Number:
  US08/092,527
• Time in Patent Office: 697 Days
• Field of Search: 73/1 G, 73/118.1, 123/688
• US Class Current: 73/1.06
• CPC Class Codes: F01N 2550/00 Monitoring or diagnosing the deterioration of exhaust systems
• CPC Class Codes: F01N 2560/025 for measuring or detecting O2, e.g. lambda sensors
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/1495 Detection of abnormalities in the air/fuel ratio feedback system

Abstract

A failure determination method for an O₂ sensor is provided wherein the air-fuel ratio of a mixture is maintained at a value which produces a leaner or richer air-fuel ratio than a stoichiometric ratio by a predetermined value, for a predetermined time after an engine starts operating in an idle region, to thereby make the oxygen concentration of exhaust gas surrounding the O₂ sensor uniform. Subsequently, the air-fuel ratio is forcibly subjected to an oscillatory change with a predetermined amplitude of ±10 to 15% of the stoichiometric ratio with respect to the stoichiometric ratio at a predetermined frequency of several Hz, to determine abnormality of the O₂ sensor based on the change of the output voltage of the O₂ sensor.

Claims

1. A failure determination method for an O₂ sensor which detects oxygen concentration of an exhaust gas from an internal combustion engine, comprising the steps of:

(a) maintaining an air-fuel ratio of a mixture supplied to the internal combustion engine at a rich or lean value, with respect to a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, for a first predetermined time period;

(b) forcibly subjecting the air-fuel ratio to an oscillatory change such that the air-fuel ratio alternately varies between a rich value with respect to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio and a lean value with respect to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio after a lapse of said first predetermined time period;

(c) detecting change of an output voltage of the O₂ sensor during the forcibly subjected oscillatory change of the air-fuel ratio; and

(d) determining abnormality of the O₂ sensor based on the detected change of the output voltage of the O₂ sensor.

2. A failure determination method according to claim 1, wherein said step (a) of maintaining the air-fuel ratio is started upon detecting operation of the internal combustion engine in a predetermined operating condition in which an amount of intake air for the internal combustion engine is below a predetermined value.

3. A failure determination method according to claim 1, wherein said step (d) of determining abnormality of the O₂ sensor comprises the substeps of:

(1) detecting a time period elapsed from a start of the oscillatory change of the air-fuel ratio until the output voltage of the O₂ sensor reaches a predetermined voltage value, as a parameter representing the change of the output voltage of the O₂ sensor; and

(2) judging that operation of the O₂ sensor is abnormal when the detected elapsed time period is longer than a predetermined time period.

4. A failure determination method according to claim 1, wherein the forcibly subjected oscillatory change of the air-fuel ratio in step (b) is carried over a time period which is shorter than the first predetermined time period of step (a).

5. A failure determination method according to claim 1, wherein an air-fuel ratio set in step (a) is different from the rich air-fuel ratio and the lean air-fuel ratio varied between in step (b).

6. A failure determination method according to claim 4, wherein said step (b) of forcibly subjecting the air-fuel ratio to an oscillatory change is started upon detecting operation of the internal combustion engine in a predetermined operating condition in which an amount of intake air for the internal combustion engine is below a predetermined value.

7. A failure determination method according to claim 6, wherein said predetermined operating condition comprises an idle operating condition.

8. The failure determine method of claim 4, wherein said step (b) of forcibly subjecting oscillatory change to the air-fuel ratio includes subjecting the air-fuel ratio to an oscillatory change with a predetermined amplitude at a predetermined frequency over a second predetermined time period.

9. A failure determination method according to claim 8, wherein said predetermined amplitude is ±

10 to 15% with respect to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, and said predetermined frequency is smaller than 10 Hz.

10. A failure determination method according to claim 4, wherein said step (d) of determining abnormality of the O₂ sensor comprises the substeps of:

(1) detecting an amplitude value of the output voltage of the O₂ sensor in at least one cycle of oscillation of the air-fuel ratio during a time period from a start of the oscillatory change to a time when a plurality of cycles of oscillation of the air-fuel ratio are completed, as a parameter representing the change of the output voltage of the O₂ sensor; and

(2) determining abnormality of the 0₂ sensor based on a result of a comparison between the detected amplitude value of the output voltage of the 0₂ sensor in said at least one cycle of oscillation and a predetermined voltage value.

11. A failure determination method according to claim 10, wherein abnormality of the O₂ sensor is determined in step (d) by detecting the amplitude value of the output voltage of the O₂ sensor In each of said plurality of cycles of oscillation, calculating a mean value of the detected amplitude values as a parameter representing the change of the output voltage of the O₂ sensor, and comparing the calculated mean value with the predetermined voltage value.

12. A failure determination method according to claim 4, which further comprises a step (e) of notifying abnormality of the O₂ sensor to a driver when abnormality of the O₂ sensor is determined in step (d).