Catalytic converter diagnostic

• US 5,431,011 A
• Filed: 12/14/1993
• Issued: 07/11/1995
• Est. Priority Date: 12/14/1993
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Original Assignee: General Motors Corporation (Motors Liquidation Co. GUC Trust)
• Inventors: Vangilder, John F., Casarella, Mark V., Wellenkotter, Kurt A., Yurgil, James R., Kleinfelder, Gary A., Wade, David R.
• Primary Examiner(s): Hart, Douglas
• Application Number:
  US08/166,978
• Time in Patent Office: 574 Days
• Field of Search: 60/274, 60/277, 60/276, 73/118.1
• US Class Current: 60/274
• CPC Class Codes: F01N 11/007 the diagnostic devices measuring oxygen or air concentration downstream of the exhaust apparatus
• CPC Class Codes: F01N 2550/02 Catalytic activity of catalytic converters
• CPC Class Codes: F01N 2900/0421 using an increment counter when a predetermined event occurs
• CPC Class Codes: Y02T 10/40 Engine management systems

Abstract

A diagnostic for an internal combustion engine exhaust gas treatment means includes a series of enabling conditions for modelling temperature and operational stability of the treatment means and includes first and second stage tests alternately applied on an engine air/fuel ratio cycle-by-cycle basis in accord with the diagnosed performance of the treatment means using post-converter oxygen sensor information. When the treatment means performance is diagnosed as being degraded close to a failed condition, the first stage is disabled and the more statistically rigorous second stage is activated to closely scrutinize converter performance using a two phase approach for false alarm protection.

Claims

1. A method for transforming an oxygen content signal into a signal indicating the oxygen storage and release capacity of a catalytic treatment means operative to catalytically treat internal combustion engine emissions passing through the catalytic treatment means, for diagnosing a fault in the catalytic treatment means, comprising the steps of:

for each of a plurality of test periods, (a) sensing a predetermined event indicating a start of a test period, (b) sensing a predetermined event indicating an end of the test period, (c) periodically sampling, after the indicated start of the test period and before the indicated end of the test period, an oxygen content signal indicating the oxygen content of engine emissions that have passed through the catalytic treatment means, (d) estimating rates of change in oxygen content between successive samples of the oxygen content signal, (e) determining a maximum rate of change in oxygen content from the estimated rates of change;

generating an average rate of change signal indicating the oxygen storage and release capacity of the catalytic treatment means as a predetermined function of the determined maximum rates of change in oxygen content for each of the plurality of test periods;

comparing the generated average rate of change signal to a predetermined signal threshold value;

providing a diagnostic signal indicating a decreased oxygen storage and release capacity of the catalytic treatment means when the generated average rate of change signal exceeds the predetermined signal threshold value; and

carrying out a supplemental diagnostic according to a predetermined process when the generated average rate of change signal exceeds the predetermined signal threshold value.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

sensing a parameter indicating engine air/fuel ratio, wherein the signal cycles between rich and lean signal ranges as the engine air/fuel ratio cycles between rich and lean; and

wherein the predetermined event indicating a start of a test period is a predetermined start of the signal cycle between rich and lean signal ranges and wherein the predetermined event indicating an end of the test period is a predetermined end of the signal cycle between rich and lean signal ranges.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the supplemental diagnostic comprises the steps of:

generating the average rate of change signal for each of a plurality of vehicle operating cycles;

transforming the average rate of change signals by passing the signals through a predetermined slow filtering process to form a slow-filtered average value signal;

comparing the slow-filtered average value signal to a predetermined high signal threshold value;

indicating a catalytic treatment means failure when the slow-filtered average value signal exceeds the predetermined high signal threshold value;

transforming the average rate of change signals by passing the signals through a predetermined fast filtering process to form a fast-filtered average value signal;

comparing the fast-filtered average value signal to a predetermined low signal threshold value; and

when the fast-filtered average value signal does not exceed the low signal threshold value, (a) generating a count of the number of average rate of change signals that were combined to determine the fast-filtered average value signal, (b) comparing the count to a count threshold, and (c) removing the indication of a catalytic treatment means failure when the count exceeds the count threshold.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the predetermined slow filtering process includes passing the average rate of change signals through a lag filter having a predetermined high filter coefficient, and wherein the predetermined high filter coefficient and the predetermined high signal threshold value are determined in accord with the exponentially weighted moving average process.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein the predetermined fast filtering process includes passing the average rate of change signals through a lag filter having a predetermined low filter coefficient, and wherein the predetermined low filter coefficient and the predetermined low signal threshold value are determined in accord with the exponentially weighted moving average process.

6. A method for diagnosing a fault condition in a catalytic treatment means for catalytically treating internal combustion engine emission passing through the catalytic treatment means, by transforming an oxygen content signal into a signal indicating oxygen storage and release capacity of the catalytic treatment means and by analyzing such signal, comprising the steps of:

periodically generating oxygen content signals by sampling an oxygen content of engine emissions that have passed through the catalytic treatment means;

transforming the oxygen content signal into the signal indicating oxygen storage and release capacity, by a (a) passing the signals through a differentiation process for estimating a rate of magnitude change between oxygen content signals;

(b) grouping each of the differentiated signals into one of a plurality of test periods;

(c) determining a maximum differentiation signal for each of the plurality of test periods;

(d) generating an average signal value as a predetermined function of the determined maximum differentiation signals;

carrying out a stage one diagnostic by comparing the average signal value to a predetermined stage one threshold value;

carrying out a predetermined stage two diagnostic when the average signal value exceeds the predetermined stage one threshold value; and

indicating a catalytic treatment means failure upon failing the stage two diagnostic.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising the steps of:

sensing a value of a parameter indicative of actual engine air/fuel ratio;

diagnosing a rich air/fuel ratio condition when the value of the parameter is within a predetermined range of rich air/fuel ratio values;

diagnosing a lean air/fuel ratio condition when the value of the parameter is within a predetermined range of lean air/fuel ratio values;

monitoring the duration of cycles of the parameter value between diagnosed rich and lean air/fuel ratio conditions; and

adjusting the test periods so that each test period spans a predetermined portion of a corresponding parameter value cycle duration.

8. The method of claim 6, further comprising the steps of:

estimating a level of catalytic activity present in the catalytic treatment means during each of the test periods;

comparing the estimated level to a threshold level of activity;

classifying a test period as an active test period if the estimated level for that test period is greater than the threshold level; and

wherein the step of generating an average signal value generates an average signal value as a predetermined function of the determined maximum differentiation signals for those test periods classified as active test periods.

9. The method of claim 6, further comprising the steps of:

sensing, during each test period, engine operating parameters indicating a presence of a predetermined stable engine operating condition;

classifying a test period as a stable test period if the sensed parameters during that test period indicate a stable engine operating condition; and

wherein the step of generating an average signal value generates an average signal value as a predetermined function of the determined maximum differentiation signals for those test periods classified as stable test periods.

10. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of carrying out a predetermined stage two diagnostic further comprises the steps of:

generating the average signal value for each of a series of vehicle operating cycles;

slow-filtering the average signal values by passing the average signal values through a lag filter having a predetermined high filter coefficient;

comparing the slow-filtered average signal value to a predetermined high signal threshold value;

failing the stage two diagnostic when the slow filtered average signal value exceeds the high signal threshold value;

fast filtering the average signal values by passing the average signal values through a lag filter having a predetermined low filter coefficient;

comparing the fast-filtered average signal value to a predetermined low signal threshold value;

comparing the number of series of vehicle operating cycles for which an average signal value was generated to a predetermined series threshold when the fast-filtered average signal value does not exceed the low signal threshold value; and

overriding the indication of a catalytic treatment means failure when the number of series exceeds the predetermined series threshold.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the predetermined high filter coefficient and the predetermined high signal threshold value are determined in accord with the exponentially weighted moving average process.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein the predetermined low filter coefficient and the predetermined low signal threshold value are determined in accord with the exponentially weighted moving average process.