Method for monitoring vehicle function components

• US 5,524,078 A
• Filed: 01/05/1995
• Issued: 06/04/1996
• Est. Priority Date: 01/05/1994
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Daimler Chrysler Company LLC (Stellantis NV)
• Original Assignee: Mercedes-Benz AG (Mercedes-Benz Group AG)
• Inventors: Woletz, Wolfgang, Schroeter, Hans, Kolb, Hartmut
• Primary Examiner(s): Teska, Kevin J.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Walker, Tyrone V.
• Application Number:
  US08/368,806
• Time in Patent Office: 516 Days
• Field of Search: 364/424.03, 364/579, 364/194, 364/281.3, 364/550, 364/551.01, 395/912, 395/913, 395/914, 395/915, 395/916, 395/917, 395/918, 395/919, 395/922, 395/575, 395/650, 395/183, 395/184, 395/185, 371/15.1
• US Class Current: 701/29
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 2270/406 Test-mode; Self-diagnosis
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 8/885 using electrical circuitry
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2050/021 Means for detecting failure or malfunction
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2050/143 Alarm means
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 50/04 Monitoring the functioning of the control system
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/22 Safety or indicating devices for abnormal conditions in air/fuel ratio feedback systems F02D41/1495, in electric control linkage F02D11/107, in purge control systems F02M25/0809
• CPC Class Codes: F16H 2061/1208 with diagnostic check cycles; Monitoring of failures
• CPC Class Codes: F16H 61/12 Detecting malfunction or potential malfunction, e.g. fail safe in control of hydrostatic gearing F16H61/4192; Circumventing or fixing failures

Abstract

A method is provided for monitoring vehicle function components using a diagnostic device taken along in the vehicle. A multiplicity of individual test routines are carried out, respectively, given the presence of start conditions specific to the test routine, in a fixed, cyclic sequence in order to obtain information on the presence or absence of a fault with respect to the relevant function components. Data relating to a first-time execution of a respective test routine is retrievably stored. With the aid of this data, before activation of a test routine pending according to a sequence provided it is determined given the presence of appropriate start conditions whether the test routine has already been performed at least once and whether at least one other activatable test routine exists which has not yet been performed. If no, the pending test routine is activated, otherwise, the test routine not yet performed is activated. This flexibility guarantees the presence of test results for each test routine in an operating time which is as short as possible.

Claims

1. A method of operating a diagnostic device in a motor vehicle, the diagnostic device using a multiplicity of single test routines successively pending in a prescribed cyclic sequence, each of the multiplicity of single test routines being activated only in response to interrogatable start conditions specific to the test routine, the method comprising the steps of:

retrievably storing in a memory an item of data information relating to whether a respective test routine has been performed at least once in a current operating phase of the diagnostic device;

prior to activating a test routine which is pending in accordance with the prescribed cyclic sequence, determining whether the pending test routine has already been performed at least once before, and determining whether at least one other test routine exists whose interrogatable start conditions are present and yet has not been performed, said determining steps being performed by retrieving appropriate stored data from the memory;

activating the pending test routine when it is determined that the pending test routine has not already been performed at least once and there is no other test routine existing having start conditions present which has not yet been performed; and

activating said at least one other test routine not yet performed when it is determined that the pending test routine has already been performed at least once before.

2. A method according to claim 1, the method further comprising the steps of:

before evaluating a respective test routine, inquiring as to whether values of input variables required for the test routine evaluation lie outside plausible prescribed value ranges; and

blocking an evaluation of the test routine, as well as of all other test routines whose input variables are a function of the evaluation of the test routine, when at least one input variable value lies outside its assigned value range.

3. A method according to claim 1, the method further comprising the steps of:

storing within a prescribable period, test results indicative of a fault or not fault for each test routine performed once or several times; and

signalling the presence of a fault with respect to an associated test routine when a ratio of a number of test results indicative of a fault to those not indicative of a fault recorded within the prescribed period exceeds a prescribed limiting value.

4. A method according to claim 2, the method further comprising the steps of:

storing within a prescribable period, test results indicative of a fault or not fault for each test routine performed once or several times; and

signalling the presence of a fault with respect to an associated test routine when a ratio of a number of test results indicative of a fault to those not indicative of a fault recorded within the prescribed period exceeds a prescribed limiting value.

5. A method according to claim 1, a method further comprising the steps of:

repeatedly retrieving and evaluating the stored data relating to the execution performed at least once in the current operating phase for a respective test routine as to whether each test routine has been performed at least once; and

generating and retrievably restoring data relating to readiness for fault readout.

6. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of retrievably storing data relating to an instantaneous value of preselected environmental parameters for a first, as well as for a respectively last, occurrence of a test result of a test routine, said test result indicating a fault.

7. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

within each current operating phase, inquiring as to whether each test routine to be performed under normal operating conditions has been performed at least once and a fault has been detected thereby; and

activating a warning lamp when a number of operating phases in which the fault has occurred exceeds a prescribed limiting value.