Fast network file system running over a hybrid connectionless transport

• US 5,526,483 A
• Filed: 12/07/1994
• Issued: 06/11/1996
• Est. Priority Date: 10/05/1992
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Morris, Gregory L., McCassey, Everett A. II, French, Steven M.
• Primary Examiner(s): Coleman, Eric
• Application Number:
  US08/352,264
• Time in Patent Office: 552 Days
• Field of Search: 395/800, 395/575, 395/200, 395/182.02, 395/200.01, 395/800
• US Class Current: 714/4.4
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 69/18 Multiprotocol handlers, e.g. single devices capable of handling multiple protocols
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 69/32 Architecture of open systems interconnection [OSI] 7-layer type protocol stacks, e.g. the interfaces between the data link level and the physical level
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 69/326 in the transport layer [OSI layer 4] H04L69/16 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 69/329 in the application layer [OSI layer 7]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 9/40 Network security protocols

Abstract

A session-oriented network application dependent on reliable transport of messages on a first system communicates in a new form of connectionless, session-oriented communication called Sideband over a network with a second similar application on a second system. Sideband transport is not guaranteed; Some types of messages and those which are lost must be sent on a reliable, non-Sideband transport. The LAN application contains means to track whether Sideband is both available and enabled on its session with the second application. The application determines whether to disable or reenable the Sideband in its session based on network reliability. As Sideband is fast, but unreliable, the application must be selective about which messages to send Sideband. Messages which would change the state of the receiving system if received twice due to retry of an apparently lost message should not be sent Sideband. The LAN application monitors the responses from the second system to determine whether any messages sent Sideband were lost. In the event of a Sideband message being lost, the application has retry logic which resends the message via a non-Sideband path.

Claims

1. In a computer network having a plurality of nodes with one or more computer systems associated with a node, a system which incorporates a first application in a first computer system the first application requesting a protocol layer to send a first message to a second application of a second computer system over the network via a first, unreliable, session-oriented protocol, the first application comprising:

means for requesting the protocol layer to send the first message via the first protocol to the second application;

means for monitoring for a response to the first message by the second application, and,

means for requesting the protocol layer to send the first message in a second, reliable protocol, protocol if the response by the second application is not received

wherein the protocol layer sends the first message in the first and second protocol.

2. The system as recited in claim 1 in which the first application further comprises:

means for determining whether the first message belongs to first class of messages which can be sent via the first protocol such that a second reception of the first message by the second application will have no harmful effects on the network or a second class of messages in which a second reception of the message by the second application will have a harmful effect in the network; and

,

wherein the first message is sent via the first protocol if the first message belongs to the class.

3. The system as recited in claim 2 wherein the determining means classifies the first message according to whether a state of the second application after a double reception of the first message by the second application will be different than after a single reception of the first message.

4. The system as recited in claim 1 wherein the first application further comprises:

means for determining that the first protocol is available in a session between the first and second applications.

5. The system as recited in claim 1 which further comprises:

means for determining that the first protocol is enabled at the time the first message is to be sent.

6. The system as recited in claim 1 wherein in the first application further comprises:

means for storing the first message to send via the second protocol if the monitoring means does not receive the response from the second application.

7. The system as recited in claim 1 which further comprises:

means for monitoring the network to determine whether the network is sufficiently reliable to send the first message via the first protocol; and

means for disabling the first protocol if the network monitoring means determines that the network is not sufficiently reliable.

8. The system as recited in claim 7 which further comprises:

means for reenabling the first protocol session if the network monitoring means determines that the network is sufficiently reliable.

9. In a computer network having a plurality of nodes with one or more computer systems associated with a node, a method carried out by a first application for requesting that a first message from the first application resident in a memory of a first computer system is to be sent by a protocol layer also in the memory of the first computer system to a second application resident in the memory of a second computer system over the network via a first, unreliable, session-oriented protocol comprising:

requesting the protocol layer to send the first message via the first protocol to the second application;

monitoring whether the first message was received by the second application; and

,

requesting the first message to be sent in a second, reliable protocol if the first message was apparently not received by the second application.

10. The method as recited in claim 9 which further comprises:

determining whether the first message belongs to a first class of messages which can be sent via the first protocol such that a retransmission of the first message to the second application will have no harmful effects on the network or a second class of messages in which a second receiption of the message by the second application will have a harmful effect in the network, and,

wherein the first message is sent via the first protocol if the first message belongs to the class.

11. The method as recited in claim 10 wherein the determining step classifies the first message according to whether a state of the second application after a double reception of the first message by the second application will be different than after a single reception of the first message.

12. The method as recited in claim 9 of:

determining that the first protocol is available in a session between the first and second applications.

13. The method as recited in claim 9 which further comprises the step of:

determining that the first protocol is enabled at the time the first message is to be sent.

14. The method as recited in claim 9 the step of:

storing the first message to send via the second protocol if the monitoring means indicates that the first message was apparently not received by the second application.

15. The method as recited in claim 9 which further comprises the steps of:

monitoring the network to determine whether the network is sufficiently reliable to send the first message via the first protocol network; and

disabling the first protocol in the session if the network monitoring means determines that the network is not sufficiently reliable.

16. The method as recited in claim 15 which further comprises the step of:

reenabling the first protocol if the network monitoring means determines that the network is sufficiently reliable.

17. For use in a computer network having a plurality of nodes with one or more computer systems associated with a node, a computer program product on a computer readable medium executable on a first computer for requesting that a first message from the product to a second application of a second computer system over the network via a first, unreliable, session-oriented protocol, the product when executed by the first computer in an application layer, comprising:

program code means for requesting the protocol layer to send the first message via the first protocol to the second application;

program code means for monitoring whether the first message was received by the second application; and

,

program code means for requesting the protocol layer to send the first message in a second, reliable protocol if the first message was apparently not received by the second application.

18. The product as recited in claim 17 which further comprises:

program code means for determining whether the first message belongs to a first class of messages which can be sent via the first protocol such that a retransmission of the first message to the second application will have no harmful effects on the network or a second class of messages in which a second reception of the message by the second application will have a harmful effect in the network; and

,

wherein the first message is sent via the first protocol if the first message belongs to the class.

19. The product as recited in claim 18 wherein the determining means classifies the first message according to whether a state of the second application after a double reception of the first message by the second application will be different than after a single reception of the first message.

20. The product as recited in claim 17 which further comprises:

program code means for determining that the first protocol is available in a session between the first and second applications.

21. The product as recited in claim 17 which further comprises:

program code means for determining that the first protocol is enabled at the time the first message is to be sent.

22. The product as recited in claim 17 which further comprises:

program code means for storing the first message if the monitoring means indicates that the first message was apparently not received by the second application.

23. The product as recited in claim 17 which further comprises:

program code means for monitoring the network to determine whether the network is sufficiently reliable to send the first message via the first protocol; and

program code means for disabling the first protocol in the session if the network monitoring means determines that the network is not sufficiently reliable.

24. The product as recited in claim 23 which further comprises:

program code means for disabling the first protocol in the session if the network monitoring means determines that the network is not sufficiently reliable.