Automated gauge, assessment system and method

• US 5,542,280 A
• Filed: 01/09/1995
• Issued: 08/06/1996
• Est. Priority Date: 01/09/1995
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Chrysler Group LLC (Stellantis NV)
• Original Assignee: Chrysler Corporation (Stellantis NV)
• Inventors: McElreath, John H., DeBardelaben, William D., Nolle, William, Cummings, Theodore M., Markow, Paul A.
• Primary Examiner(s): NOLAND, THOMAS
• Application Number:
  US08/370,087
• Time in Patent Office: 575 Days
• Field of Search: 73/1 R, 73/2, 73/866.1
• US Class Current: 73/1.41
• CPC Class Codes: G01P 1/11 by the detection of the position of the indicator needle
• CPC Class Codes: G01P 21/02 of speedometers

Abstract

A gauge, system and method are disclosed for determining the accuracy and performance of a gauge by determining the angular deflection of the gauge needle in response to a known input signal. A frequency generator supplies a predetermined frequency signal or a controller supplies an input signal to a gauge motor which causes deflection of the gauge needle. A video camera is used to capture a video frame corresponding to the visual data indicating the needle deflection. The needle includes a head portion and a remote portion, such as a hub or tail, which show up as high intensity values against the low intensity background in the video frame. The pixel intensity values around the perimeter of a selected portion of the frame are scanned to determine the location of maximum intensity pixels which correspond to either the head or the remote portion of the needle. Alternatively, the image is scanned in terms of color. By ascertaining the locations of the head and the remote portion, the exact deflection of the needle can be quickly and accurately determined. This deflection is then compared against the expected deflection based on the known input signal. If the deviation between the two values is not within an acceptable range, the particular gauge is rejected. The deviation may also be used to calibrate the gauge, for example, by realigning the needle or by storing one or more compensation values to be used by the gauge.

Claims

1. A gauge assessment apparatus for use with a gauge having a needle that deflects in response to an input control signal, comprising:

means for generating a predetermined gauge input signal;

means for recording a needle deflection of the gauge in response to the predetermined input signal;

means for analyzing the needle deflection to determine locations of a head portion of the gauge needle and a needle portion remote from said head portion to thereby determine the actual needle deflection; and

means for comparing the actual needle deflection with an expected needle deflection corresponding to the predetermined gauge input signal to thereby assess the accuracy of the gauge.

2. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 1, wherein the remote portion is one of a tail portion and a hub portion.

3. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 2, wherein the means for recording comprises a camera.

4. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 3, wherein said camera is used to capture a video frame image containing the gauge needle in a deflected state, and wherein the video frame is analyzed in terms of intensity in order to locate the head portion and the remote portion.

5. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 4, wherein the means for analyzing comprises means for scanning at least a portion of the needle deflection to locate the head portion and the remote portion.

6. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 5, wherein the means for scanning includes means for detecting maximum intensity locations corresponding to the head portion and the remote portion.

7. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 3, wherein said camera is used to capture a video frame image containing the gauge needle in a deflected state, and wherein the video frame is analyzed in terms of color in order to locate the head portion and the remote portion.

8. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 1, wherein the means for recording includes means for scaling the needle deflection.

9. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 1, wherein the means for comparing further comprises means for calibrating the gauge.

10. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 9, wherein the means for calibrating further comprises means for storing at least one compensation value, said compensation value being based on said actual needle deflection and said expected needle deflection.

11. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 9, wherein the means for calibrating further comprises means for realigning said needle.

12. A gauge assessment apparatus for use with a gauge having a needle that deflects in response to an input signal, comprising:

a generator to generate a predetermined gauge input signal;

a recording unit to record a needle deflection of the gauge in response to the predetermined input signal;

a processing unit to analyze the needle deflection to determine locations of a head portion of the gauge needle and a needle portion remote from said head portion to thereby determine the actual needle deflection; and

a comparison unit to compare the actual needle deflection with an expected needle deflection corresponding to the predetermined gauge input signal to thereby assess the accuracy of the gauge.

13. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 12, wherein the remote portion is one of a tail portion and a hub portion.

14. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 13, wherein the recording unit comprises a camera.

15. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 14, wherein said camera is used to capture a video frame image containing the speedometer gauge needle in a deflected state, and wherein the video frame is analyzed in terms of intensity in order to locate the head portion and the remote portion.

16. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 14, wherein said camera is used to capture a video frame image containing the speedometer gauge needle in a deflected state, and wherein the video frame is analyzed in terms of color in order to locate the head portion and the remote portion.

17. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 13, wherein the processing unit comprises a scanner to scan at least a portion of the needle deflection to locate the head portion and the remote portion.

18. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 17, wherein the scanner comprises a detecting circuit to detect maximum intensity locations corresponding to the head portion and the remote portion.

19. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 12, wherein the recording unit comprises a scaling unit to scale the needle deflection.

20. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 12, wherein the comparison unit further comprises a calibration unit.

21. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 20, wherein the calibration unit further comprises a storage unit to store at least one compensation value, said compensation value being based on said actual needle deflection and said expected needle deflection.

22. The gauge assessment apparatus of claim 20, wherein the calibration unit further comprises an alignment unit to realign said needle.

23. A method of assessing the accuracy of a gauge having a needle that deflects in response to an input signal, comprising the steps of:

generating a predetermined gauge input signal;

applying the predetermined gauge input signal to a gauge;

recording a needle deflection of the gauge in response to the predetermined input signal;

analyzing the needle deflection to determine locations of a head portion of the gauge needle and a needle portion remote from said head portion;

determining an actual needle deflection based on the locations of the head portion and the remote portion; and

comparing the actual needle deflection with an expected needle deflection corresponding to the predetermined gauge input signal to thereby assess the accuracy of the gauge.

24. The method of claim 23, wherein the recording step includes the further step of recording a visual image.

25. The method of claim 24, wherein the remote portion is one of a tail portion and a hub portion and the analyzing step includes the further step of scanning at least a portion of the needle deflection to locate the head portion and remote portion.

26. The method of claim 25, wherein the scanning step includes the further step of analyzing the visual image with respect to pixel intensities to locate the head portion and the remote portion.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein the step of analyzing the visual image with respect to pixel intensities includes the further step of analyzing the pixel intensities along at least one arcuate region within the visual image.

28. The method of claim 26, wherein the scanning step includes the further step of locating maximum intensity locations corresponding to the head portion and the remote portion.

29. The method of claim 25, wherein the scanning step includes the further step of analyzing the visual image with respect to color to locate the head portion and the remote portion.

30. The method of claim 27, wherein the step of analyzing the visual image with respect to color intensities includes the further step of analyzing the pixel intensities along at least one arcuate region within the visual image.

31. The method of claim 23, wherein the recording step includes the further step of scaling the needle deflection output.

32. The method of claim 23, wherein the comparing step includes the further step of calibrating said gauge.

33. The method of claim 32, wherein the calibrating step includes the further step of storing at least one compensation value, said compensation value being based on said actual needle deflection and said expected needle deflection.

34. The method of claim 32, wherein the calibrating step includes the further step of realigning said needle.