Height finding antenna apparatus and method of operation

• US 5,557,282 A
• Filed: 10/11/1988
• Issued: 09/17/1996
• Est. Priority Date: 10/11/1988
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Exelis Incorporated (L3Harris Technologies, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: ITT Corporation (ITT, Inc.)
• Inventors: Mertens, Donald E.
• Primary Examiner(s): Hellner, Mark
• Application Number:
  US07/255,917
• Time in Patent Office: 2,898 Days
• Field of Search: 342/140, 342/147, 342/123, 343/771
• US Class Current: 342/123
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/426 Scanning radar, e.g. 3D radar G01S13/66 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/44 Monopulse radar, i.e. simultaneous lobing
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/723 by using numerical data
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 7/03 Details of HF subsystems specially adapted therefor, e.g. common to transmitter and receiver
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 7/2813 Means providing a modification of the radiation pattern for cancelling noise, clutter or interfering signals, e.g. side lobe suppression, side lobe blanking, null-steering arrays specially adapted to secondary radar systems G01S13/762; aerials or aerials systems H01Q21/29, H01Q25/00
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 19/17 the primary radiating source comprising two or more radiating elements H01Q19/15, H01Q25/00 take precedence

Abstract

A ground based radar antenna system and method for determining the elevation angle φ of a tracked target having a shaped reflector and a pair of spaced feedhorns for transmitting radiated energy to and receiving returned signals from the tracked target T, the shaped reflector and feedhorns cooperating to increase the range of coverage of the elevation angle φ beyond the coverage previously available with a standard parabolic reflector and to increase the gain of the signals returned to the ground based radar antenna system while simultaneously eliminating elevation angle ambiguities over prior systems employing only feedhorns for collecting returned signals. The radar system includes a construction which approximates a cosecant-squared antenna pattern, permits the calculation of the target height and three-dimensional position, and is economical to manufacture.

Claims

1. A dual beam radar system comprising, in combination:

means for generating a plurality of signals;

means for feeding said plurality of signals, said feeding means in electronic communication with said signal generating means for providing an antenna pattern dependent upon an elevation angle of a tracked target;

means for reflecting a plurality of radiated energy received from said feeding means, said reflecting means being asymmetrical in shape for focusing and directing said energy to said target and for receiving a plurality of returned signals from said target, said reflecting means providing a cosecant-squared antenna pattern; and

means for measuring an electrical phase angle difference between said plurality of returned signals, said phase angle difference for determining said elevation angle of said target, said asymmeterical reflecting means and said feeding means for providing a greater range of elevation angle coverage of said target by reflecting said radiated energy at larger angles and by restricting said plurality of return signals directed to said feeding mean to smaller angles wherein a large angular region of said return signals is translated into a small angular region of said return signals for eliminating ambiguities in said elevation angle and for providing an increased return signal gain and a unique value of elevation angle for discrete value of said phase angle difference wherein said unique value of said elevation angle permits determining the height of said target.

2. The dual beam radar system of claim 1 wherein said signal generating means comprises a radiation signal source.

3. The dual beam radar system of claim 1 wherein said feeding means comprises a plurality of spaced feedhorns.

4. The dual beam radar system of claim 1 wherein said unique value of elevation angle provided for each discrete value of said measured electrical phase angle difference provides for the elimination of ambiguities in said elevation angle.

5. The dual beam radar system of claim 1 wherein a first of said plurality of returned signals is a high beam returned signal.

6. The dual beam radar system of claim 1 wherein a second of said plurality of returned signals is a low beam returned signal.

8. The dual beam radar system of claim 1 wherein a first of said plurality of returned signals is plotted on a high beam curve and a second of said plurality of returned signals is plotted on a low beam curve, said high beam curve intersecting said low beam curve at a crossover point, said crossover point for determining the boundaries in the measurement of said elevation angle.

10. The dual beam radar system of claim 1 wherein said plurality of spaced feedhorns are separated by at least a wavelength of said radiated energy.

7. The dual beam radar system of claim wherein the amplitudes of each of said plurality of returned signals are compared for determining the application of said electrical phase angle difference to said returned signals for determining said elevation angle of said target.

9. A height-finding dual beam radar system comprising, in combination:

means for generating a plurality of signals;

a plurality of spaced feedhorns in electronic communication with said signal generating means for providing an antenna pattern dependent upon an elevation angle of a tracked target;

an asymmetrically-shaped reflector for focusing a plurality of radiated energy received from each of said feedhorns and directing said energy to said target and for receiving a plurality of return signals from said target, said asymmetrically shaped reflector providing a cosecant-squared antenna pattern; and

means for measuring an electrical phase angle difference between said plurality of return signals, said phase angle difference for determining said elevation angle of said target, said asymmetrically-shaped reflector and said feedhorns for providing a greater range of elevation angle coverage of said target by reflecting said radiated energy at larger angles and by restricting said plurality of return signals directed to said plurality of feedhorns to smaller angles wherein a large angular region of said return signals is translated into a smaller angular region said return signals for eliminating ambiguities in said elevation angle and for providing an increased return signal gain and a unique value of elevation angle for each discrete value of said phase angle difference wherein said unique value of said elevation angle permits determining the height of said target.

11. A method for determining an elevation angle of a tracked target from a dual beam radar system, said method comprising the steps of:

providing a radiating source for generating a plurality of signals;

providing a plurality of spaced feedhorns in communication with said radiating source for creating an antenna pattern dependent upon said elevation angle of said target;

focusing a plurality of radiated energy received from each of said feedhorns onto an asymmetrically-shaped reflector for directing said radiated energy to said target;

directing a plurality of target return signals received by said asymmetrically-shaped reflector to said plurality of feedhorns for providing said return signals to said radar system for electrical phase comparison; and

measuring an electrical phase angle difference between said plurality of return signals for determining said elevation angle of said target, said asymmetrically-shaped reflector and said feedhorns for providing a greater range of elevation angle coverage of said target by reflecting said radiated energy at larger angles and by restricting said plurality of return signals directed to said plurality of feedhorns to smaller angles wherein a large angular region of said return signals is translated into a smaller angular region of said return signals for eliminating ambiguities in said elevation angle and for providing an increased return signal gain and a unique value of elevation angle for each discrete value of said phase angle difference wherein said unique value of said elevation angle permits determining the height of said target.

12. The method of claim 11 further including the step of comparing the amplitudes of each of said returned signals for assisting in determining said elevation angle subsequent to measuring said electrical phase angle.

13. The method of claim 11 further including the step of plotting a first of said returned signals on a high beam curve and plotting a second of said returned signals on a low beam curve wherein said high beam curve intersects said low beam curve at a crossover point, said crossover point for determining the boundaries for measuring said elevation angle.

14. The method of claim 13 further including the step of mapping a plurality of data from said low beam curve into a first linear curve representing 360°

of said electrical phase angle difference between said returned signals over a first range of elevation angles.

15. The method of claim 13 further including the step of mapping a plurality of data from said high beam curve into a second linear curve representing 360°

of said electrical phase angle difference between said returned signals over a second range of elevation angles.

16. The method of claim 11 further including the step of determining said elevation angle by graphically locating said electrical phase angle difference on one of a plurality of linear curves and identifying said elevation angle on a coordinate axis.

17. The method of claim 11 further including the step of separating said plurality of feedhorns by at least a wavelength of said radiated energy.