Mass detection by computer using digital mammograms of the same breast taken from different viewing directions

• US 5,579,360 A
• Filed: 12/30/1994
• Issued: 11/26/1996
• Est. Priority Date: 12/30/1994
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: US Philips Corporation (Koninklijke Philips N.V.)
• Original Assignee: Philips Electronics North America Corporation (Koninklijke Philips N.V.)
• Inventors: Abdel-Mottaleb, Mohamed
• Primary Examiner(s): Porta, David P.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Bruce, David Vernon
• Application Number:
  US08/367,023
• Time in Patent Office: 697 Days
• Field of Search: 378/37, 378/210, 382/130, 382/131, 382/132, 382/133
• US Class Current: 378/37
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 6/4216 using storage phosphor screens
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 6/4233 using matrix detectors
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 6/502 for diagnosis of breast, i.e. mammography
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 5/50 using two or more images, e.g. averaging or subtraction

Abstract

Two digital radiologic images taken from different viewing directions of a same region, notably a mammogram study of the same breast, are automatically processed by a computer to identify suspect masses by producing processed mammogram images in which suspect spots, the skinline and the nipple are marked or enhanced. Candidate suspect spots are initially identified by individually processing each mammogram image separately. Then characteristics of the candidate spots identified in the mammogram images taken from different viewing directions are compared to eliminate false positives. The characteristics compared include position of the spots relative to the explicitly detected nipple, and their size, shape, brightness and brightness variance. The candidate spots are separately identified by thresholding the breast region of the mammogram at 20 or more threshold levels determined from a histogram of the image to discriminate spots, and classifying the spots by size, shape and variance in intensity of the pixels comprising the spot. Overlaps are resolved after the comparison between views.

Claims

1. A method of producing a computer-enhanced mammogram comprising:

irradiating a breast of a patient being examined with X-ray radiation sequentially in a predetermined first viewing direction and in a predetermined different second viewing direction;

receiving the X-ray radiation exiting the breast sequentially from said first viewing direction and from said second viewing direction within respective two-dimensional fields;

producing digital signals as a function of the X-ray radiation received, which digital signals correspond to a first input two-dimensional array of digital pixels for said first viewing direction and a second input two-dimensional array of digital pixels for said second viewing direction;

in response to said signals, storing said first input two-dimensional array and said second input two-dimensional array in a digital memory means accessible to a computer; and

with said computer;

for each of the first input array and the second input array, detecting a skinline and thereby segmenting the array into breast and background regions, identifying a reference point along the detected skinline corresponding to the location of the nipple, and identifying spots within the breast region which based on their size and shape are suspect;

correlating characteristics of spots identified as suspect in the first input array with characteristics of spots identified as suspect in the second input array, said correlating including comparing positions of spots identified as suspect in the first input array relative to the identified reference point in said first input array with the positions of the spots identified as suspect in the second input array relative to the identified reference point in said second input array, and

producing an output two-dimensional array of digital pixels from the at least one of the first input array and the second input array in which the spots identified as suspect in at least one of the first input array and the second input array whose characteristics are correlated within predetermined criteria to the spots identified as suspect in the other of the first input array and the second input array are marked or enhanced.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said comparing positions of the spots identified as suspect in the first input array with the positions of the spots identified as suspect in the second input array is by comparing depths relative to the reference point along a line passing through the reference point and a center of mass of the breast region.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said identifying of spots within the breast region as suspect based on their size and shape comprises thresholding at least a portion of the stored input array at, at least, 20 different threshold levels to discriminate spots, for each spot discriminated, forming a plurality of measures of said spot, including of its size and shape, and determining whether the formed plurality of measures fall within further predetermined criteria.

4. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein said identifying of spots within the breast region as suspect based on their size and shape comprises thresholding at least a portion of the stored input array at, at least, 20 different threshold levels to discriminate spots, for each spot discriminated, forming a plurality of measures of said spot, including of its size and shape, and determining whether the formed plurality of measures fall within predetermined criteria.

5. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein after said correlating, if there are any groups of overlapping spots identified as suspect in the at least one of the first input array and the second input array whose characteristics are correlated with spots identified as suspect in the other of the first input array and the second input array within said predetermined criteria, then with respect to said groups of overlapping spots, only the largest spot of each such group is marked or enhanced.

6. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein said formed measures include one of the variance or uniformity of values of the digital pixels comprising said spot.

7. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein said formed measures include one of the variance or uniformity of values of the digital pixels comprising said spot.

8. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein said correlating of characteristics includes comparison of the thresholds at which the spots were discriminated.

9. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein said correlating of characteristics includes comparison of the thresholds at which the spots were discriminated.

10. A system for producing a computer-enhanced mammogram comprising:

means including an X-ray source, for irradiating a breast of a patient under examination with X-ray radiation sequentially in predetermined first and second different viewing directions;

means for receiving the X-ray radiation exiting the breast sequentially from said first and second viewing directions within respective two-dimensional fields;

means for producing digital signals as a function of the X-ray radiation received, which digital signals correspond to first and second input two-dimensional arrays of digital pixels for the respective first and second viewing directions;

a computer;

a digital memory means accessible to said computer;

means for, in response to said signals, storing said input two-dimensional array of digital pixels in said digital memory means; and

display means responsive to said computer for displaying an output array of digital pixels produced by said computer as an image;

wherein said computer is configured for;

processing the stored first and second input two-dimensional arrays of digital pixels by for each of the first input array and the second input array, detecting the skinline and thereby segmenting the array into breast and background regions, identifying a reference point along the skinline corresponding to the location of the nipple, and identifying spots within the breast region which based on their size and shape are suspect;

correlating characteristics of spots identified as suspect in the first input array with characteristics of spots identified as suspect masses in the second input array, said correlating including comparing positions of spots identified as suspect in the first input array relative to the identified reference point c in said first input array with the positions of the spots identified as suspect in the second input array relative to the identified reference point in said second input array, and

producing the output two-dimensional array of digital pixels from the at least one of the first input array and the second input array in which any spots identified as suspect in at least one of the first input array and the second input array whose characteristics are correlated within predetermined criteria to the spots identified as suspect in the other of the first input array and the second input array are marked or enhanced.

11. The apparatus as claimed in claim 10, wherein said identifying of spots within the breast region as suspect based on their size and shape comprises thresholding at least a portion of the stored input array at, at least, 20 different threshold levels to discriminate spots, for each spot discriminated, forming a plurality of measures of said spot, including of its size and shape, and determining whether the formed plurality of measures fall within further predetermined criteria.

12. The apparatus as claimed in claim 11, wherein after said correlating, if there are any groups of overlapping spots identified as suspect in the at least one of the first input array and the second input array whose characteristics are correlated with spots identified as suspect in the other of the first input array and the second input array within said predetermined criteria, then with respect to said groups of overlapping spots, only the largest spot of each such group is marked or enhanced.

13. The apparatus as claimed in claim 11, wherein said formed measures include one of the variance or uniformity of values of the digital pixels comprising said spot.

14. The apparatus as claimed in claim 11, wherein said correlating of characteristics includes comparison of the thresholds at which the spots were discriminated.

15. The apparatus as claimed in claim 10, wherein said comparing positions of the spots identified as suspect in the first input array with the positions of the spots identified as suspect in the second input array is by comparing depths relative to the reference point along a line passing through the reference point and a center of mass of the breast region.

16. The apparatus as claimed in claim 15, wherein said identifying of spots within the breast region as suspect based on their size and shape comprises thresholding at least a portion of the stored input array at, at least, 20 different threshold levels to discriminate spots, for each spot discriminated, forming a plurality of measures of said spot, including of its size and shape, and determining whether the formed plurality of measures fall within predetermined criteria.

17. The apparatus as claimed in claim 16, wherein said formed measures include one of the variance or uniformity of values of the digital pixels comprising said spot.

18. The apparatus as claimed in claim 16, wherein said correlating of characteristics includes comparison of the thresholds at which the spots were discriminated.