Integrated fueling control

• US 5,596,972 A
• Filed: 10/30/1995
• Issued: 01/28/1997
• Est. Priority Date: 10/30/1995
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Original Assignee: General Motors Corporation (Motors Liquidation Co. GUC Trust)
• Inventors: Folkerts, Charles H., Matthews, Gregory P., Kushion, Mark D., Sultan, Myrna C.
• Primary Examiner(s): Moulis, Thomas N.
• Application Number:
  US08/558,600
• Time in Patent Office: 456 Days
• Field of Search: 123/516, 123/518, 123/519, 123/520
• US Class Current: 123/520
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 2041/141 using a feed-forward control element
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/0032 Controlling the purging of the canister as a function of the engine operating conditions
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/0042 Controlling the combustible mixture as a function of the canister purging, e.g. control of injected fuel to compensate for deviation of air fuel ratio when purging
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/0045 Estimating, calculating or determining the purging rate, amount, flow or concentration
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/1401 characterised by the control or regulation method F02D41/1473, F02D41/1477 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: F02M 25/08 adding fuel vapours drawn from engine fuel reservoir electrical control of purge system F02D41/003

Abstract

Integrated control of internal combustion engine fueling including control of fuel injectors and control of purge valve position to vary the rate at which fuel vapor trapped in a canister is purged to an engine intake manifold, determines the mass of purge vapor reaching the intake manifold, estimates the mass of purge vapor reaching each engine cylinder, and adjusts the engine cylinder fuel injection mass in response thereto to provide an accurate overall cylinder fueling insensitive to the purge rate, allowing the purge control operations to be aggressively driven while ambitious cylinder air/fuel ratio standards are maintained. Feedforward purge control proactively adjusts purge control commands in response to desired cylinder purge mass and to purge vapor flow dynamics and feedback purge control trims the purge control commands in response to a difference between the desired cylinder purge mass and estimated cylinder purge mass.

Claims

1. In an internal combustion engine having an intake manifold for receiving engine intake air and distributing the intake air to a plurality of engine cylinders, the engine having at least one fuel injector controlled to inject fuel from a fuel supply for combustion in the engine cylinders and in which a purge valve is controlled for controlling the mass flow rate of fuel vapor from a canister to the intake manifold for distribution to the engine cylinders and combustion therein, the canister for trapping fuel vapors released by the fuel supply, an integrated engine fuel control method for integrating fuel injector and purge valve control to provide a desirable engine fueling rate, comprising the steps of:

measuring purge vapor concentration;

measuring purge vapor pressure;

predicting the actual mass flow rate of cylinder purge vapor as a function of the measured purge vapor concentration and pressure;

generating a desired engine cylinder fuel mass;

reducing the desired engine cylinder fuel mass by the predicted actual mass of cylinder purge vapor;

calculating a fuel injector command as the fuel injector command that will provide for injection of the reduced desired engine cylinder fuel mass; and

controlling at least one fuel injector in accord with the calculated fuel injector command.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the predicting step further comprises the steps of:

calculating mass flow rate of intake manifold purge vapor as a function of the measured purge vapor concentration and pressure;

modeling purge vapor transport dynamics between the intake manifold and engine cylinders;

applying the calculated mass flow rate of intake manifold purge vapor to the purge vapor transport dynamics model to predict the actual mass flow rate of cylinder purge vapor.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

generating a desired mass of purge vapor to an engine cylinder;

calculating purge vapor mass error as a difference between the generated desired mass and the predicted actual mass of cylinder purge vapor;

determining a purge valve command as a function of the calculated purge vapor mass error; and

controlling the purge valve in accord with the determined purge valve command.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising the steps of:

modeling purge vapor transport dynamics between the intake manifold and engine cylinders; and

generating a feedforward purge vapor control command as a function of the modeled purge vapor transport dynamics;

and wherein the step of determining a purge valve command determines the purge valve command as a function of the feedforward purge vapor control command.

5. An engine control method for controlling engine air/fuel ratio by integrating control of the mass of fuel delivered by fuel injectors during each engine fuel injection event with control of a purge valve for purging fuel vapors trapped in a canister to an engine intake manifold, comprising the steps of:

measuring the concentration of fuel vapors being admitted to the intake manifold;

measuring the pressure of fuel vapors being admitted to the intake manifold;

calculating the actual mass flow rate of fuel vapors being admitted to the intake manifold as a predetermined function of the measured fuel vapor concentration and pressure;

for each engine cylinder having a corresponding fuel injector, (a) estimating the mass of fuel vapors being admitted to the engine cylinder as a function of the calculated actual mass flow rate of fuel vapors being admitted to the intake manifold, (b) determining a desired cylinder air/fuel ratio, (c) generating a desired fuel mass to be delivered to the engine cylinder as a function of the desired cylinder air/fuel ratio, (d) calculating a fuel injection mass as a difference between the desired fuel mass to be delivered to the engine cylinder and the estimated mass of fuel vapors being admitted to the engine cylinder, (e) determining a fuel injector command as a function of the calculated fuel injection mass, and (f) outputting the fuel injector command at a fuel injection event to deliver the calculated fuel injection mass for combustion in the engine cylinder.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising the step of:

modeling purge vapor transport dynamics between the engine intake manifold and the engine cylinders;

and wherein the step of estimating the mass flow rate of fuel vapors being admitted to the engine cylinder estimates the mass flow rate of fuel vapors being admitted to the engine cylinders by applying the calculated actual mass flow rate of fuel vapors being admitted to the intake manifold to the modeled purge vapor transport dynamics.

7. The method of claim 5, further comprising the steps of:

providing a desired mass of purge vapor to individual engine cylinders;

determining a purge vapor mass error as a difference between the desired mass of purge vapor to individual engine cylinders and the estimated actual mass of fuel vapors being admitted to the engine cylinder;

generating a purge valve command as a function of the purge vapor mass error to controllably drive the error toward a minimum error; and

applying the purge valve command to the purge valve to control mass of fuel vapor to the engine intake manifold.

8. The method of claim 7, further comprising the step of:

modeling the purge vapor transport dynamics between the engine intake manifold and the engine cylinders;

determining a feedforward purge valve command to provide the desired mass of purge vapor to engine cylinders by applying the desired mass of purge vapor to the purge vapor transport dynamics model; and

adjusting the generated purge valve command by the determined feedforward purge valve command.