Method of Locating Hydrocarbon reserves

• US 5,646,342 A
• Filed: 07/31/1995
• Issued: 07/08/1997
• Est. Priority Date: 03/27/1992
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Schlumberger Technology Corporation (SLB)
• Original Assignee: Schlumberger Technology Corporation (SLB)
• Inventors: Hagenes, Odd Bjarte
• Primary Examiner(s): Williams, Hezron E.
• Assistant Examiner(s): WIGGINS, JOHN DAVID
• Application Number:
  US08/510,951
• Time in Patent Office: 708 Days
• Field of Search: 73/151, 73/154, 73/155, 73/784, 73/152.02, 73/152.47, 73/152.58, 73/620, 436/27, 436/29, 436/25, 175/40, 175/45, 175/50, 367/25, 367/53, 367/47, 367/61, 367/62, 166/250, 364/420, 364/421, 364/422
• US Class Current: 73/152.02
• CPC Class Codes: G01V 1/30 Analysis G01V1/50 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01V 11/00 Prospecting or detecting by methods combining techniques covered by two or more of main groups G01V1/00 - G01V9/00

Abstract

A method of locating hydrocarbon reserves comprising: selecting on the basis of a hydrocarbon hypothesis from a region of interest below the surface of the earth patches having probabilities of containing hydrocarbon reserves greater than a predetermined probability; defining from structural data a respective structural closure for each of the patches, each structural closure comprising an area capable of enclosing a hydrocarbon reserve and having a perimeter of constant depth substantially equal to the deepest point of the patch; determining a measure of the geometrical match between each patch and the respective structural closure; and selecting each patch having a measure of the geometrical match exceeding a predetermined measure. Particular geometrical matching methods include those relating to the height, area, volume and perimeter outline of the potential reserves.

Claims

1. A method of locating hydrocarbon reserves comprising:

preparing a hydrocarbon hypothesis map for a region of interest below the surface of the earth, wherein said map represents groups of different pluralities of points used to define a set of possible hydrocarbon containing patches, for all points lying therewithin, the probability of each point containing hydrocarbons;

determining, on the basis of said hydrocarbon hypothesis map, patches each comprising a plurality of graph points having probabilities of containing hydrocarbon reserves greater than a predetermined probability;

defining, from structural data on the region of interest obtained independently of the hydrocarbon hypothesis map and representing depth of earth substrate, a respective structural closure for each of the patches, each structural closure comprising an area capable of enclosing a hydrocarbon reserve and having a perimeter of constant depth substantially equal to the deepest point of the region of interest covered by the patch;

determining a measure of the geometrical difference between each patch and the respective structural closure using geometrical characteristics derived from each of the plurality Of graph points used to define said each patch;

and locating possible hydrocarbon reserves by selecting each patch having a measure of the geometrical difference less than a predetermined measure.

2. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein the measure of the geometrical difference includes a measure of the difference between the vertical height of the patch and the vertical height of the structural closure.

3. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein the measure of the geometrical difference includes a measure of the difference between the area of the patch and the area at the bottom of the structural closure.

4. A method as defined in claim 2 wherein the measure of the geometrical difference includes a measure of the difference between the area of the patch and the area at the bottom of the structural closure.

5. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein the measure of the geometrical difference includes a measure of the difference between the volume of the patch and the volume of the structural closure.

6. A method as defined in claim 2 wherein the measure of the geometrical difference includes a measure of the difference between the volume of the patch and the volume of the structural closure.

7. A method as defined in claim 3 wherein the measure of the geometrical difference includes a measure of the difference between the volume of the patch and the volume of the structural closure.

8. A method as defined in claim 4 wherein the measure of the geometrical difference includes a measure of the difference between the volume of the patch and the volume of the structural closure.

9. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein the measure of the geometrical difference includes a measure of the difference between an outline of the edge of the patch and an outline of the edge of the structural closure.

10. A method as defined in claim 2 wherein the measure of the geometrical difference includes a measure of the difference between an outline of the edge of the patch and an outline of the edge of the structural closure.

11. A method as defined in claim 3 wherein the measure of the geometrical difference includes a measure of the difference between an outline of the edge of the patch and an outline of the edge of the structural closure.

12. A method as defined in claim 4 wherein the measure of the geometrical difference includes a measure of the difference between an outline of the edge of the patch and an outline of the edge of the structural closure.

13. A method as defined in claim 5 wherein the measure of the geometrical difference includes a measure of the difference between an outline of the edge of the patch and an outline of the edge of the structural closure.

14. A method as defined in claim 6 wherein the measure of the geometrical difference includes a measure of the difference between an outline of the edge of the patch and an outline of the edge of the structural closure.

15. A method as defined in claim 7 wherein the measure of the geometrical difference includes a measure of the difference between an outline of the edge of the patch and an outline of the edge of the structural closure.

16. A method as defined in claim 8 wherein the measure of the geometrical difference includes a measure of the difference between an outline of the edge of the patch and an outline of the edge of the structural closure.

17. A method as defined in claim 9 wherein the outline cost is a function of (a) the variance of the depth of a patch outline compared to the average depth of the patch outline, and (b) the expected acceptable variance.

18. A method as defined in claim 10 wherein the outline cost is a function of (a) the variance of the depth of a patch outline compared to the average depth of the patch outline, and (b) the expected acceptable variance.

19. A method as defined in claim 11 wherein the outline cost is a function of (a) the variance of the depth of a patch outline compared to the average depth of the patch outline, and (b) the expected acceptable variance.

20. A method as defined in claim 12 wherein the outline cost is a function of (a) the variance of the depth of a patch outline compared to the average depth of the patch outline, and (b) the expected acceptable variance.

21. A method as defined in claim 13 wherein the outline cost is a function of (a) the variance of the depth of a patch outline compared to the average depth of the patch outline, and (b) the expected acceptable variance.

22. A method as defined in claim 14 wherein the outline cost is a function of (a) the variance of the depth of a patch outline compared to the average depth of the patch outline, and (b) the expected acceptable variance.

23. A method as defined in claim 15 wherein the outline cost is a function of (a) the variance of the depth of a patch outline compared to the average depth of the patch outline, and (b) the expected acceptable variance.

24. A method as defined in claim 16 wherein the outline cost is a function of (a) the variance of the depth of a patch outline compared to the average depth of the patch outline, and (b) the expected acceptable variance.