Process for systems analysis

• US 5,646,871 A
• Filed: 03/10/1995
• Issued: 07/08/1997
• Est. Priority Date: 03/10/1994
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Bull Sas (Atos SE)
• Original Assignee: Bull Sas (Atos SE)
• Inventors: Cadot, Michel
• Primary Examiner(s): Cosimano, Edward R.
• Application Number:
  US08/401,697
• Time in Patent Office: 851 Days
• Field of Search: 364/550, 364/551.01, 364/579, 364/580, 395/183.02, 395/916
• US Class Current: 702/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/328 Computer systems status display G06F11/327 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2201/81 Threshold
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 706/916 Electronic or computer, internal or network, circuit

Abstract

A process for systems analysis of a database non-agreement system using a set of gauges. Measurement of the state of a system. A gauge function, a threshold value and a recommendation are associated with at least one part of the gauges. Each gauge function returns a value which characterizes the state of the system analyzed and a recommendation based on the logical relationship between the value returned and the threshold value is emitted for the user of the system. The gauges for the analysis of a system are grouped into investigations. The process can be adapted to the analysis of any system by editing an ASCII data file which contains the list of gauges, of the designations of the associated functions, and of the associated thresholds and the associated recommendations. A graphic interface makes it possible to select the investigations to be applied to the system.

Claims

1. A process for analyzing a state of a system to advise a user of the system on said state, the process comprising:

.

using a set of gauges, each gauge relating to a piece of information on said state of the system and being associated with at least one gauge function, each gauge function relating to a measurement to be performed on the system to have said piece of information;

using a first data file for designating said gauge functions;

making from said first data file a second data file controllable by the user to contain the designation of the gauge functions to be applied to the system;

analyzing said second data file and applying said gauge functions to the system for performing said measurements of system to have corresponding values dependent on said state of the system;

defining recommendations for use of the system in accordance with conditions on said values;

analyzing said values with respect to said conditions to have those of said recommendations which are appropriate to said values; and

displaying said appropriate recommendations for the system on a screen or storing them in a file.

2. The process of claim 1, wherein at least one part of the gauge functions is designated in said first and second data files by a name and a data path of an executable program.

3. The process of claim 1, wherein at least one part of the gauge functions is designated in said first and second data files by text of a request.

4. The process of claim 1, wherein the first and second data files are text files.

5. The process of claim 1 wherein the second data file is made by the user by means of a graphic interface, the step of analyzing the second data file is made by means of an analysis module of a motor module, and the steps of applying the gauge functions, analyzing the values with respect to the conditions and emitting the appropriate recommendations are made by means of an inquiry module of the motor module, and the graphic interface and the motor module are independent from the system analyzed.

6. The process of claim 1, further including providing a name data file, wherein each gauge has a name contained in said name data file and the second data file is also made from the name data file to contain the names of the gauges associated with the gauge functions designated in said second data file.

7. The process of claim 6, wherein the name data file is a text file.

8. The process of claim 1, further including providing a recommendations data file, wherein each gauge is associated with at least one of said recommendations, said recommendations being contained in said recommendations data file, and the second data file is also made from the recommendations data file to contain the recommendations associated with the gauge functions designated in said second data file.

9. The process of claim 8, wherein the recommendations data file is a text file.

10. The process of claim 1, further including providing alarm data file, wherein said alarm data file contains alarm thresholds associated with the gauges and the second data file is also made from the alarm data file to contain the alarm thresholds of the gauges associated with the gauge functions designated in the second data file.

11. The process of claim 10, wherein the alarm data file is a text file.

12. The process of claim 1, wherein the gauges are grouped into investigations and global gauge functions are associated with at least one part of the investigations, and further wherein the process further comprises using an investigation file which includes the investigations, the gauges which constitute these investigations and designations of the global gauge functions and

establishing the second data file from data in the investigation file to contain the investigations to be applied to the system and the designations of the global gauge functions associated with these investigations.

13. The process of claim 12, wherein the second data file is a text file.

14. The process of claim 1, further including providing a thresholds data file, wherein each gauge is also associated with at least one numerical or logical threshold values of said conditions, said numerical threshold values being contained in said thresholds data file and said second data file also contains the numerical values of the gauges associated with the gauge functions designated in said second data file, and the appropriate recommendations are emitted when the values have a certain relationship to the associated thresholds.

15. The process of claim 14, wherein in said second and thresholds data files a symbol (>

, <

, =, . . . ) is associated with one of the numerical thresholds, said symbol indicating whether the associated recommendation must be triggered when the value corresponding to the associated gauge function moves above or below the threshold or when it does not have the value of the threshold or when any other logical relationship exists between the threshold value and the value corresponding to the gauge function.

16. The process of claim 14, wherein the thresholds data file is a text file.

17. A software tool for analyzing a state of a system to advise a user of the system on said state, the tool using a set of gauges for analyzing the system, each gauge relating to a piece of information on said state of the system and being associated with at least one gauge function, each gauge function relating to a measurement to be performed on the system to have said piece of information, the tool also using recommendations for use of the system in accordance with conditions on values corresponding to said measurements and the tool comprising:

a first data file for designating said gauge functions;

means for making from said first data file a second data file controllable by the user to contain the designation of the gauge functions to be applied to the system;

means for analyzing said second data file;

means for applying said gauge functions to the system for performing said measurements of the system to have said values which are dependent on said state of the system;

means for analyzing said values with respect to said conditions and to have those of said recommendations which are appropriate to said values; and

means for displaying said appropriate recommendations for the system on a screen or storing them in a file.

18. The tool of claim 17, wherein at least one part of the gauge functions is designated in said first and second data files by text of a request.

19. The tool of claim 17, further including a recommendations data file, wherein each gauge is associated with at least one of said recommendations, said recommendations being contained in said recommendations data file, and the second data file is also made from said recommendations data file to contain the recommendations associated with the gauge functions designated in said data file.

20. The tool of claim 17, further including an alarm data file, wherein the alarm data file contains alarm thresholds associated with the gauges and the second data file is also made from the alarm data file to contain the alarm thresholds of the gauges associated with the gauge functions designated in the second data file.

21. The tool of claim 17, wherein the first and second data files are text files.

22. The tool of claim 17, wherein the system is a data base system and the tool is included in a data base management system for said data base system.

23. The tool of claim 17, wherein at least one part of the gauge functions is designated in said first and second data files by a name and a data path of an executable program.

24. The tool of claim 23, wherein at least one part of the gauge functions is designated in said first and second data files by text of a request.

25. The tool of claim 17, wherein said means for making the second file includes a graphic interface, said means for analyzing the second data file includes an analysis module of a motor module and said means for applying the gauge functions, analyzing the values with respect to the conditions and emitting the appropriate recommendations includes an inquiry module of the motor module, and in that the graphic interface and the motor module are independent from the system analyzed.

26. The tool of claim 25, wherein the system is a data base system and the tool is included in a data base management system for said data base system.

27. The tool of claim 17, further including a thresholds data file, wherein each gauge is also associated with at least one numerical or logical threshold values of said conditions, said numerical threshold values being contained in said thresholds data file and said second data file also contains the numerical values of the gauges associated with the gauge functions designated in said second data file, and the appropriate recommendations are emitted when the values have a certain relationship to the associated thresholds.

28. The tool of claim 27, wherein in said second and thresholds data files a symbol (>

, <

, =, . . . ) is associated with one of the numerical thresholds, said symbol indicating whether the associated recommendation must be triggered when the value corresponding to the associated gauge function moves above or below the threshold or when it does not have the value of the threshold or when any other logical relationship exists between the threshold value and the value corresponding to the gauge function.

29. The tool of claim 27, wherein the gauges are grouped into investigations, and including:

an investigation file which includes the list of investigations, the gauges which constitute these investigations and designations of the global gauge functions associated with at least one part of the investigations,

a gauge file which includes the list of all the gauges, of all the associated recommendations, of the thresholds associated to at least certain gauges and of the gauge functions associated to at least certain gauges;

a configuration file being established from data in the gauge file and data in the investigation file.

30. The tool of claim 29, wherein the configuration file is a text file.

31. The tool of claim 29, wherein the configuration file contains a list of alarm thresholds associated with the gauges.

32. The tool of claim 29, wherein different gauge functions are associated with gauges in the gauge file and with the corresponding investigations in the investigation file such that the configuration file is established by using the gauge functions of the investigation file for said gauges.