Fuel consumption estimating method

• US 5,652,378 A
• Filed: 08/16/1996
• Issued: 07/29/1997
• Est. Priority Date: 08/16/1996
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Caterpillar Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Caterpillar Incorporated
• Inventors: Dussault, Robert G.
• Primary Examiner(s): Dombroske, George M.
• Application Number:
  US08/698,615
• Time in Patent Office: 347 Days
• Field of Search: 73/115, 73/116, 73/117.2, 73/117.3, 73/118.1, 73/119 A, 73/113, 73/114, 73/196, 73/198, 73/199, 73/861.06, 340/439, 340/442, 340/450.2, 364/431.03, 364/431.04
• US Class Current: 73/114.52
• CPC Class Codes: G01F 9/001 with electric, electro-mechanic or electronic means G01F9/008 and G01F9/02 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01F 9/023 with electric, electro-mechanic or electronic means

Abstract

A method for estimating the fuel consumption of a tractor and trailer combination during a test period and identify at least one of a plurality of operating conditions attributable to the actual total fuel consumption being a preselected minimum amount greater than the estimated total fuel consumption. A processor determines a correction factor for each of the plurality of operating conditions and a related estimated fuel consumption penalty or gain. The processor determines a combined correction factor and a related total estimated fuel consumption for the combined correction factors. The estimated fuel consumption penalties or gains and the total estimated fuel consumption are displayed on a monitor.

Claims

1. A method for estimating the fuel consumption of a preselected engine driven tractor and trailer combination, said method including a processor, and comprising the steps of:

selecting a preselected engine type and determining an engine type correction factor "E" based on the selected engine type;

estimating a normal cruise speed of the engine driven tractor and trailer combination and determining an estimated cruise speed correction factor "S" based on the received predetermined estimated normal cruise speed;

selecting a tractor category and trailer type and determining an aerodynamic tractor and trailer load type correction factor "L" based on the tractor category and trailer type;

selecting a magnitude of space between the tractor and trailer and a trailer height and determining an aerodynamic trailer gap correction factor "G" corresponding to the space between the tractor and trailer and the trailer height;

selecting at least one a plurality of special trailer features and determining an aerodynamic trailer features correction factor "F" based on the special features selected;

receiving a preselected testing period determining an average daily ambient temperature correction factor "T" for the preselected testing period;

selecting a percentage of time of operation at gross combination weight and the gross combination weight of the tractor trailer combination and determining an average gross combination weight correction factor "W" based on the percentage of time of operation at gross combination weight and the gross combination weight of the tractor trailer combination;

selecting a percentage of time at which the engine is at idle for the testing period and determining an engine idle time correction factor "I" for the percentage of time selected;

selecting a tire type in use on the tractor and trailer and determining a tire correction factor "A" based on the preselected tire type in use on the engine driven tractor and trailer combination;

selecting an estimated travel frequency on a two lane road and determining a road correction factor "R" based on the estimated travel frequency;

selecting a predetermined API gravity value at a time of fuel mileage checking and determining an average fuel API gravity correction factor "B" based on the selected API gravity value;

summing the correction factors in steps a-k to determine a combined correction factor "CCF";

determining a total estimated fuel consumption "EFC" based on the combined correction factor "CCF"; and

recording a magnitude of the total estimated fuel consumption.

2. The method, as set forth in claim 1, including a monitor and wherein said step of recording the magnitude of the total estimated fuel consumption includes the step of displaying the magnitude of the said total estimated fuel consumption on the monitor.

3. The method, as set forth in claim 1, including a monitor and wherein the step of recording a magnitude of the total estimated fuel consumption includes the step of displaying the magnitude of the total estimated fuel consumption numerically in miles per gallon on said monitor.

4. The method, as set forth in claim 2, including the steps of:

determining one of an estimated fuel consumption penalty and gain related to preselected ones of the correction factors "E", "S", "L", "G", "F", "T", "W", "I", "A", "R", and "B"; and

displaying on said monitor in a descending order of importance said one estimated fuel consumption penalty and gain related to each of the preselected correction factors.

5. The method, as set forth in claim 4, including a printer connected to said processor, including the step of printing on a paper said one estimated fuel consumption penalty and gain related to each of the preselected correction factors.

6. The method, as set forth in claim 4, including the step of displaying on said monitor a base line parameter related to each of the preselected correction factors.

7. The method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of determining an average daily ambient temperature correction factor "T", includes the steps of:

receiving an actual and an annual mileage of the tractor and trailer combination and determining a testing period from the actual and annual mileage of the tractor and trailer combination;

receiving a month of the year in which the testing period ended; and

determining the average daily ambient temperature correction factor "T" based on the testing period and the month of the year in which the testing period was recorded.

8. The method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of determining an average daily ambient temperature correction factor "T" includes the step of obtaining said average daily ambient temperature correction factor "T" from a table.

9. The method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of determining said aerodynamic tractor and trailer load type correction factor "L" includes the steps of:

selecting from a tractor type table a tractor category having a tractor most resembling the tractor being tested; and

selecting a load type correction factor "L" from a load type correction factor table listing trailer types by said tractor category.

10. The method, as set forth in claim 9, wherein the step of determining the aerodynamic trailer gap correction factor "G" includes the step of selecting, based on the preselected space between the tractor and trailer and a preselected trailer height, a trailer gap correction factor "G" from a trailer gap correction factor table.

11. The method, as set forth in claim 10, wherein said step of determining an aerodynamic trailer features correction factor "F" includes the step of selecting for the preselected testing period an aerodynamic trailer features correction factor "F" from an aerodynamic trailer features correction factor table.

12. The method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of determining a total estimated fuel consumption "EFC" includes the step of selecting the value of the total estimated fuel consumption "EFC" for the combined correction factor "CCF" from a fuel consumption table.

13. The method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein said processor is connected to an engine control module and including the step of receiving at least one of an actual mileage, an annual mileage, a normal cruise speed, and an idle time signal from the engine control module.

14. The method, as set forth in claim 13, including the steps of:

determining an actual fuel consumption based on the actual mileage and a total quantity of fuel used;

comparing the actual fuel consumption to the estimated fuel consumption and displaying the difference.

15. A method for identifying at least one of a plurality of operating conditions attribute to an actual total fuel consumption being greater in magnitude than the magnitude of a total estimated fuel consumption of an engine driven tractor and trailer combination, said method including a processor and a monitor;

and comprising the steps of;

receiving a plurality of operating condition signals;

determining a correction factor for each of the plurality of operating condition signals;

determining one of a fuel consumption gain and penalty for each of said plurality of correction factors;

listing said one fuel consumption gain and penalty related to each of said plurality of correcting factors in an estimated fuel consumption summary table;

displaying said estimated fuel consumption summary table on the monitor.

16. The method, as set forth in claim 15, including the steps of:

receiving fuel consumption related signals from one of an input device and an engine control module;

determining a total actual fuel consumption "AFC" based on said fuel consumption related data;

combining each of said correction factors;

determining a total estimated fuel consumption from the combined correction factor; and

displaying the total estimated fuel consumption "EFC" on said monitor.

17. The method, as set forth in claim 16, including the step of selecting said total estimated fuel consumption "EFC" for the engine driven tractor and trailer combination from a total estimated fuel consumption conversion table.

18. The method, as set forth in claim 16, including the steps of:

determining a difference between the total estimated fuel consumption "EFC" and the total actual fuel consumption rate "AFC" of the engine driven tractor and trailer combination; and

disregarding any significance in the fuel consumption penalties and gains listed in the estimated fuel consumption summary in response to a difference in magnitude between the total estimated fuel consumption and the total actual fuel consumption being less than a predetermined magnitude.

19. The method, as set forth in claim 16, including the steps of:

determining a difference between the total estimated fuel consumption "EFC" and the total actual fuel consumption rate "AFC" of the engine driven tractor and trailer combination; and

displaying said difference on the monitor.