Method and system for reprioritizing calendar items on a data processing system

• US 5,664,175 A
• Filed: 08/13/1993
• Issued: 09/02/1997
• Est. Priority Date: 08/13/1993
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Williams, Marvin L., Miller, Paul L., Warren, William E. III, Jackson, Brion K.
• Primary Examiner(s): Kriess, Kevin A.
• Application Number:
  US08/106,467
• Time in Patent Office: 1,481 Days
• Field of Search: 395/650, 395/673, 395/607, 395/670, 395/672, 395/674, 395/675, 395/676, 395/677, 364/DIG. 1, 364/281.8, 364/230.1, 364/419.1, 364/401
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/109 Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting

Abstract

Calendar objects on a data processing system include an item, a due date and a priority value. The objects are reprioritized according to their due dates and priority values. For each object, a difference between the respective due date and a selected date is determined. The selected date is typically the current date. An importance value is determined by combining the difference with the priority value of each object. The objects are sorted and ranked according to their importance values. The sorted objects are then displayed to a user. If the due date is passed the selected date, then a past due notification is provided to the user for that object.

Claims

1. A method for reprioritizing calendar objects on a data processing system for a selected date, comprising the steps of:

a) obtaining said objects from a database on said data processing system, each of said objects having a due date and a priority value;

b) for each object, determining a difference between said respective due date and said selected date and weighting said respective priority value by said difference to determine an importance of said object; and

c) prioritizing said objects according to the importance of each object.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

a) determining if two objects have the same importance; and

b) if two objects have the same importance, then prioritizing said two objects by a predetermined parameter associated with said objects.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

a) determining if said two objects have the same importance; and

b) if so, then prioritizing said two objects by their respective priority values.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of producing a list of said prioritized objects to a user.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising the step of flagging for said user those objects having a due date that is past said selected date.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein said step of producing a list of said prioritized objects to a user further comprises the step of producing a list of those objects having the respective due dates located within a predetermined range from said selected date.

10. The data processing system of claim 1, further comprising means for producing a list of said prioritized objects to a user.

11. The data processing system of claim 10, further comprising means for flagging for said user those objects having a due date that is past said selected date.

12. The data processing system of claim 10, wherein said means for producing a list of said prioritized objects to a user further comprises means for producing a list of those objects having the respective due dates located within a predetermined range from said selected date.

7. A data processing system for reprioritizing calendar objects for a selected date, comprising:

a) means for obtaining said objects from a database on said data processing system, each of said objects having a due date and a priority value;

b) means for determining a difference between said respective due date and said selected date for each object and for weighting said respective priority value by said difference to determine an importance of said respective object; and

c) means for prioritizing said objects according to the importance of each object.

8. The data processing system of claim 7, further comprising:

a) means for determining if two objects have the same importance; and

b) means for prioritizing said two objects by a predetermined parameter associated with said objects if said two objects have the same importance.

9. The data processing system of claim 7, further comprising:

a) means for determining if said two objects have the same importance; and

b) means for prioritizing said two objects by their respective priority values if said two objects have the same importance.