Process for controlling the driving stability with the king pin inclination difference as the controlled variable

• US 5,701,248 A
• Filed: 06/07/1995
• Issued: 12/23/1997
• Est. Priority Date: 11/25/1994
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: ITT Automotive Europe GmbH (Xylem, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: ITT Automotive Europe GmbH (Xylem, Inc.)
• Inventors: Wanke, Peter
• Primary Examiner(s): ZANELLI, MICHAEL J
• Application Number:
  US08/475,677
• Time in Patent Office: 930 Days
• Field of Search: 364/426.01, 364/426.02, 364/426.03, 364/426.023, 364/426.028, 303/139, 303/140, 303/146, 303/147, 303/148, 303/150, 303/155, 303/167, 303/186, 303/189, 180/197
• US Class Current: 701/70
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2400/1042 using at least two sensors
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 2210/12 Friction
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 2230/02 Side slip angle, attitude angle, floating angle, drift angle
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 2270/313 with less than three sensors (yaw rate, steering angle, lateral acceleration)
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 8/1755 Brake regulation specially adapted to control the stability of the vehicle, e.g. taking into account yaw rate or transverse acceleration in a curve road vehicle drive control systems for control of driving stability otherwise than by controlling a particular sub-unit B60W30/02
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 10/184 with wheel brakes
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2422/95 Measuring the same parameter at multiple locations of the vehicle
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2520/125 Lateral acceleration
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2520/14 Yaw
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2520/20 Sideslip angle
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2720/14 Yaw
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2720/30 Wheel torque
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/02 Control of vehicle driving stability
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 40/064 Degree of grip

Abstract

A process for controlling the driving stability of a vehicle is provided. To avoid complicated models for determining the desired value of a variable characteristic of the travel behavior, which variable usually must be calculated by an expensive calculation circuit, a controlled variable is selected, which directly describes the driving stability and is compared with an actual value, which can be calculated in a relatively simple manner. An advantageous embodiment describes comparing an actual value of the variable, which can be determined in a simple manner, with a desired value. The range of tolerance of the variable is set directly by the driving stability limits. Advantageous variants pertain to the suitable scheme of calculation and the selection of a suitable range of tolerance.

Claims

1. A method for controlling driving stability of a vehicle having front and rear axles, each of the axles having wheels, comprising the steps of:

(a) forming a variable which characterizes the driving stability of the vehicle, the variable being a difference between a front kingpin inclination value and a rear kingpin inclination value for the wheels of the front and rear axles, respectively;

(b) performing a comparison between the variable and a predetermined desired value; and

(c) controlling the vehicle based on the comparison, so that the variable approaches a desired value.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the vehicle has a steering angle, a yaw rate and a velocity, and step (a) includes:

determining the steering angle, the yaw rate and the velocity, and

calculating the difference based on the steering angle, the yaw rate and the velocity.

3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the difference is determined by the equation:

##EQU30## where α

_v is the front kingpin inclination value, α

_h is the rear kingpin inclination value, α

_v -α

_h is the difference, δ

is the steering angle, l is a distance between the front and rear axles, Ψ

is the yaw rate, and v is the velocity.

4. A method according to claim 1, wherein step (c) is only executed if the absolute value of the difference is greater than or equal to a threshold value.

5. A method according to claim 4, wherein step (c) is only executed if the difference is:

greater than a positive threshold value, or

less than a negative threshold value which differs in absolute value from the positive threshold value.

6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the absolute value of the positive threshold value is greater than the absolute value of the negative threshold value.

7. A method according to claim 1, wherein the vehicle has an engine and a plurality of brakes, and step (c) includes controlling one of the group consisting of the engine and the brakes, so that the variable approaches the desired value.

8. A method for controlling driving stability of a vehicle having a steering angle, a velocity, and front and rear axles, each of the axles having wheels, comprising the steps of:

(a) determining;

(1) a maximum allowable positive difference between a front kingpin inclination value for the wheels of the front axle and a rear kingpin inclination value for the wheels of the rear axle, and

(2) a maximum allowable negative difference between the front kingpin inclination value and the rear kingpin inclination value;

(b) determining first and second yaw rate values which correspond to the maximum allowable positive and negative differences, respectively;

(c) calculating a yaw rate based on the steering angle and the velocity;

(d) performing comparisons, individually, between the calculated yaw rate and each of the first and second yaw rate values; and

(e) controlling the vehicle based on the comparisons, so that the yaw rate is maintained between the first and second yaw rate values.

9. A method according to claim 8, wherein the first and second yaw rate values are calculated according to the equations:

##EQU31## where Ψ

_Desired1 and Ψ

_Dersired2 are the first and second yaw rate values, respectively, δ

is the steering angle, v is the velocity, l is a distance between the front and rear axles, and K1 and K2 are the maximum allowable positive and negative differences, respectively.

10. A method according to claim 8, wherein the vehicle has an engine and a plurality of brakes, and step (e) includes controlling one of the group consisting of the engine and the brakes, so as to maintain the yaw rate between the first and second yaw rate values.

11. Process for controlling a vehicle to improve travel behavior, comprising:

determining a characteristic variable characterizing the current actual travel condition of the vehicle, the characteristic variable being a difference between the king pin inclination on the front wheels and the kingpin inclination on the rear wheels, the characteristic variable being compared with an adequate desired value,

generating control signals as a function of the result of the comparison, and

correcting the control of the vehicle behavior on the basis of said control signals.

12. Process in accordance with claim 11, wherein the step of determining the difference of the king pin inclinations includes determining and using the steering angle, the yaw rate and the velocity of the vehicle.

13. Process in accordance with claim 12, wherein the step of determining the characteristic variable includes determining the difference of the king pin inclinations, by relating the steering angle, the yaw rate and the velocity of the vehicle to one another in a calculation circuit as follows:

##EQU32## in which α

_v is the front kingpin inclination value, α

_h is the rear kingpin inclination value, α

_v -α

_h is the difference, δ

is the steering angle, l is a distance between the front and rear axles, Ψ

is the yaw rate, and v is the velocity.

14. Process in accordance with claim 11, wherein the step of generating control signals is executed only when the calculated difference of the king pin inclinations (α

_v -α

_h) is outside a range of tolerance of the desired value.

15. Process in accordance with claim 14, wherein the range of tolerance is arranged asymmetrically to the 0 value of the difference of the king pin inclinations (α

_v -α

_h) in the sense that the higher permissible desired values are in the range characterizing the understeering of the vehicle.

16. Process in accordance with claim 11, wherein the yaw rate is calculated as the determined value, and the yaw rate is compared with a range of tolerance of the desired value, which is calculated as follows:

##EQU33## in which Ψ

_Desired1 and Ψ

_Desired2 are the desired yaw rates for understeering and oversteering, respectively, δ

is the steering angle, v is the velocity of the center of gravity of the vehicle, and l is the distance between the wheel axles, and K1 and K2 are the permissible differences of the king pin inclinations between the front wheels and the rear wheels

wherein the step of correcting the control of the vehicle behavior includes controlling one of the group consisting of the engine and the individual brakes of the vehicle, so that the yaw rate is maintained between Ψ

_Desired1 and Ψ

_Desired2.