Electronic funds confirmation at point of transaction

• US 5,703,344 A
• Filed: 06/30/1995
• Issued: 12/30/1997
• Est. Priority Date: 06/30/1995
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Visa International Service Association (Visa, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Visa International Service Association (Visa, Inc.)
• Inventors: Chenevich, William, Bezy, E. William
• Primary Examiner(s): Hajec, Donald T.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Le, Thien Minh
• Application Number:
  US08/497,195
• Time in Patent Office: 914 Days
• Field of Search: 235/379, 235/380, 364/406, 364/408, 902/22, 902/40, 340/825.33, 340/825.31, 380/24
• US Class Current: 235/379
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/04 Payment circuits
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/042 characterized in that the payment protocol involves at least one cheque
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/403 Solvency checks
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/4037 Remote solvency checks
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/02 Banking, e.g. interest calculation or account maintenance credit or loans G06Q40/03
• CPC Class Codes: G07F 7/08 by coded identity card or credit card or other personal identification means without personal verification means G07F7/02

Abstract

A real-time point of transaction funds confirmation system is provided whereby a draft is presented by a payor to a payee and a bank identifier and an account identifier are electronically read off the draft and used as part of a funds confirmation request. The funds confirmation request is submitted to a network where a plurality of payees and a plurality of payor banks are connected. The payor bank identified on the draft verifies the account identifier and compares the amount of the transaction to an amount of funds available in the account corresponding to the account identifier. The payor bank processor then returns a response message indicating whether or not sufficient funds were available. If the request is a funds guarantee request, then the payor bank will generally place a halt on funds sufficient to cover the draft. Otherwise, if the request is merely a funds verification request, the payor bank may choose not to place a hold on the funds.

Claims

1. A real-time point-of-transaction funds confirmation system wherein a draft is presented to a payee by a payor for later presentation by the payee or an agent of payee to a payor financial institution in exchange for good funds, the system comprising:

an electronically-readable identification of an account on which the draft is drawn, the account being the eventual source of the good funds;

an electronically-readable identification of the payor financial institution;

reading means for reading the identification of the account and the identification of the payor financial institution from the draft and for generating a request record for verification of funds or guarantee of funds, said request record including the identification of the account, the identification of the payor financial institution, a transaction amount, and the request type;

a network coupler which couples the reading means to a transaction network, wherein the transaction network carries said request record;

a network for coupling a plurality of network couplers to a plurality of payor bank processors;

a payor bank processor which reads said request record and reads account data from an account identified by the account identifier to verify availability of funds in the amount indicated by the transaction amount when the request type indicates the request record is for verification of funds;

means for verifying availability of funds in the amount indicated by the transaction amount and for recording a hold on funds based on a payee bank funds guarantee policy when the request type indicates the request record is a funds guarantee request; and

means for generating and sending a response record to the network coupler, in real-time, wherein the response record indicates whether the payor bank identifier and the account identifier are valid and whether sufficient funds to cover the transaction amount are available in the account.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein the draft is a check and the account identifier and the payor bank identifier are encoded in magnetic-ink computer readable (MICR) format.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the network includes a means for standing in for an off-line payor bank processor.

4. A real-time point-of-transaction funds confirmation system wherein a draft is presented to a payee by a payor for later presentation by the payee or an agent of payee to a payor financial institution in exchange for good funds, the system comprising:

an electronic character reader for identifying the identification of the payor financial institution and a payor account identifier printed on the draft and generating an electronic request record for verification of funds or guarantee of funds, said request record including the identification of the payor financial institution and the payor account identifier, a request amount, and a request type;

a transaction network comprising a stand-in file and a payor control database and coupled to a plurality of payor bank processors;

said electronic character reader coupled to the transaction network, said transaction network receiving said electronic request record from said electronic character reader and relaying said electronic request record to the payor financial institution; and

the payor financial institution including a serial number database, a response packager, and an account database, said serial number database and response packager coupled to said response packager, said response packager capable of verifying availability of funds in an account indicated by said electronic request record and capable of generating and sending a response record in real-time, said response record indicative of the validity of the account indicated by said electronic request record and the availability of funds in the account.

5. The system of claim 4 wherein the payor financial institution further includes a holds database coupled to said response packager, the holds database containing a list of prior holds placed on the account indicated by said electronic request record.

6. The system of claim 5 wherein said response packager is further capable of recording a hold on the account in response to a funds guarantee request.

7. The system of claim 4 further comprising a merchant bank coupling said electronic character reader to said transaction network.

8. The system of claim 7 wherein said merchant bank capable of receiving and reformulating said electronic request record for providing to said transaction network.

9. The system of claim 4 wherein said transaction network further comprises a payor banks database.

10. The system of claim 4 wherein said serial number database maintains a list of valid and invalid serial numbers for the account indicated by said electronic request record.