Method of land vehicle suspension evaluation and design through roll angle analysis

• US 5,723,782 A
• Filed: 11/29/1996
• Issued: 03/03/1998
• Est. Priority Date: 11/29/1996
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Robert C. Bolles Jr
• Original Assignee: Robert C. Bolles Jr
• Inventors: Bolles, Robert C. Jr.
• Primary Examiner(s): Chilcot, Richard
• Assistant Examiner(s): Noori, Max H.
• Application Number:
  US08/759,086
• Time in Patent Office: 459 Days
• Field of Search: 73/146, 73/178 R, 73/862.541
• US Class Current: 73/178.00R
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 17/0162 mainly during a motion involving steering operation, e.g. cornering, overtaking B60G17/0164 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2400/61 Load distribution
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2800/012 Rolling condition

Abstract

A method of land vehicle suspension evaluation and design through roll angle analysis. The method is based on predicting front roll angle and rear roll angle for a given road bank angle and lateral vehicle force. Method steps include determining a vehicle front section sprung weight, determining a vehicle rear section sprung weight, predicting a front roll angle, predicting a rear roll angle, comparing the predicted front roll angle XXXX to the predicted rear roll angle, and changing suspension components XXXXXXXX until the predicted front roll angle equals the predicted rear roll angle. Benefits associated with equalizing the front and rear roll angles include improved vehicle stability, increased total vehicle tractive capacity, and better handling.

Claims

1. A method for improving a land vehicle suspension by predicting and equalizing front and rear roll angles for a given road bank angle and a lateral vehicle force, the method comprising:

a. determining the said vehicle front section sprung weight, which is defined by the vehicle sprung weight borne by the said vehicle front tires;

b. determining the said vehicle rear section sprung weight, which is defined by the vehicle sprung weight borne by the said vehicle rear tires;

c. predicting a front roll angle using the said vehicle front section sprung weight and a front section lateral force along with the said vehicle suspension variable measurements and track banking angle, in conjunction with inputs of spring rates of the said vehicle'"'"'s front left and right wheel suspensions, roll center location, sway bar diameter, front sprung center of the gravity height;

d. predicting a rear roll angle using the said vehicle rear section sprung weight and a rear section lateral force along with the said vehicle suspension variable measurements and track banking angle, in conjunction with inputs of spring rates of the said vehicle'"'"'s rear left and right wheel suspensions, roll center location, sway bar diameter, rear sprung center of the gravity height;

e. comparing the predicted front roll angle to the predicted rear roll angle as determined in steps a-d; and

f. changing the said suspension variables until the said predicted front roll angle equals to the said predicted rear roll angle.