Software product evaluation

• US 5,731,991 A
• Filed: 05/03/1996
• Issued: 03/24/1998
• Est. Priority Date: 05/03/1996
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP (Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Company)
• Original Assignee: Electronic Data Systems Corporation (Perspecta, Inc.)
• Inventors: Hicks, Jeffrey S., Kinra, Gautam Raj, Gerboth, Robert P.
• Primary Examiner(s): Voeltz, Emanuel T.
• Assistant Examiner(s): SHAH, KAMINI S
• Application Number:
  US08/642,068
• Time in Patent Office: 690 Days
• Field of Search: 364/551.01, 364/468, 364/401, 364/402, 364/403, 364/474.24, 395/919, 395/600, 395/188, 395/183, 395/131, 395/920
• US Class Current: 702/186
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3452 Performance evaluation by statistical analysis
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 706/92 Simulation

Abstract

A system (10) for evaluating a software product includes an interface (12). The interface (12) receives product data relating to the software product, and a first memory (14) stores the product data. A second memory (23, 32) stores a plurality of weighting values. A processor (26, 36) is coupled to the first memory (14) and the second memory (23, 32). The processor (26, 36) applies the plurality of weighting values to the product data to generate at least one criterion score for the software product. Each criterion score represents an evaluation of the software product.

Claims

1. An automated method for evaluating a combination of software products, comprising:

receiving product data relating to a plurality of software products;

generating environment data from the product data, the environment data relating to a software environment which comprises a combination of the software products;

applying a plurality of weighting values to the environment data; and

generating at least one score for the software environment in response to the weighted environment data, each score representing an evaluation of the software environment.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of generating at least one score further comprises the step of associating each at least one score with a corresponding category of weighted environment data.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of displaying each score.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the step of generating at least one score further comprises the step of graphically displaying an evaluation bar corresponding to each score.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of receiving product data comprises the step of receiving a plurality of numerical values associated with a plurality of evaluation statements.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the weighting values comprise:

a plurality of criterion weighting values, each criterion weighting value applied to a corresponding criterion of the environment; and

a plurality of category weighting values, each category weighting value applied to a corresponding set of criteria of the environment.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising the following steps performed after the step of generating at least one score:

modifying at least a portion of the weighting values;

applying the modified weighting values to the environment data; and

generating at least one score for the software environment in response to the weighted environment data.

8. An automated method for evaluating a combination of a first software product and a second software product, comprising:

receiving first product data for the first software product;

receiving second product data for the second software product;

generating environment data from the first product data and the second product data, the environment data relating to a software environment which comprises a combination of the first and second software products;

applying a plurality of weighting values to the environment data; and

generating at least one score for the software environment in response to the weighted environment data.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the step of generating at least one score further comprises the step of

associating each at least one score with a corresponding category of weighted environment data.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein the steps of receiving first product data and second product data comprise the steps of receiving a plurality of numerical values associated with a plurality of evaluation statements.

11. The method of claim 8, wherein the weighting values comprise:

a plurality of criterion weighting values, each criterion weighting value applied to a corresponding criterion of the software environment; and

a plurality of category weighting values, each category weighting value applied to a corresponding set of criteria of the software environment.

12. The method of claim 8, further comprising the step of displaying each score.

13. The method of claim 8, further comprising the following steps performed after the step of generating at least one score:

modifying at least a portion of the weighting values;

applying the modified weighting values to the environment data; and

generating at least one score for the software environment in response to the weighted environment data.

14. The method of claim 8, wherein the step of generating at least one score further comprises the step of

graphically displaying an evaluation bar corresponding to each score.

15. A system for evaluating a combination of software products, comprising:

an interface operable to receive product data relating to a plurality of software products;

a first memory coupled to the interface and operable to store the product data;

a second memory operable to store a plurality of weighting values; and

a processor coupled to the first memory and the second memory, the processor operable to generate environment data from the product data, the environment data relating to a software environment which comprises a combination of the software products, the processor further operable to apply the weighting values to the environment data to generate at least one score for the software environment, the score representing an evaluation of the software environment.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the processor is further operable to generate a screen illustrating the score.

17. The system of claim 15, wherein the processor is further operable to associate each score with a corresponding category of weighted environment data.

18. The system of claim 16, further comprising a display coupled to the processor and operable to display the generated screen.

19. The system of claim 15, wherein the processor is further operable to modify the weighting values.

20. The system of claim 15, wherein the weighting values comprise:

a plurality of criterion weighting values, each criterion weighting value applied to a corresponding criterion of the software environment; and

a plurality of category weighting values, each category weighting value applied to a corresponding set of criteria of the software environment.