Assessment methods and apparatus for an organizational process or system

• US 5,737,494 A
• Filed: 12/08/1994
• Issued: 04/07/1998
• Est. Priority Date: 12/08/1994
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Intellimet International Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Tech-Metrics International, Inc.
• Inventors: Guinta, Lawrence R., Frantzve, Lori A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Hafiz, Tariq R.
• Application Number:
  US08/351,896
• Time in Patent Office: 1,216 Days
• Field of Search: 395/10-11, 395/50-51, 395/54, 395/60
• US Class Current: 706/47
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0639 Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising

Abstract

Method and apparatus for computer-aided assessment of organizational process or system. Method and apparatus are adapted to display computer displayed questions to an assessor, who then inputs numerical inputs relative to the assessor'"'"'s perception of the process or system. Filtering techniques inhibit entry of unsupported numerical inputs which may be untrue and/or exaggerated. Sequential questions used in combination provide more accurate assessment of the system or process, thereby enabling focused audits and/or inspections.

Claims

1. A method of using a computer to gather information about an organizational process or system, comprising:

displaying on a display device computer driven questions, at least some of the computer driven questions being adapted to prompt an assessor who has at least some knowledge about the organizational process or system to numerically input on an input device of the computer the assessor'"'"'s perception of the capability of the organizational process or system to address an issue;

receiving a first numerical input from the input device of the computer, the first numerical input being stored in a memory of the computer, and the first numerical input reflecting the assessor'"'"'s perception of the capability of the organizational process or system to address an issue;

comparing within a processing unit of the computer the first numerical input to a first value, and, if the first numerical input has a first predetermined characteristic in relation to the first value, then prompting the assessor to identify evidence that supports the first numerical input, and if evidence is identified that supports the first numerical input, then validating the first numerical input for subsequent evaluation, and if the evidence is not identified that supports the first numerical input, then inhibiting validation of the first numerical input until the evidence is identified or until the first numerical input is changed to have a second predetermined characteristic in relation to the first value;

displaying on the display device computer driven questions that are adapted to prompt the assessor to numerically input a second numerical input on the input device of the computer, the second numerical input reflecting the assessor'"'"'s perception of how extensively the organizational process or system is deployed; and

receiving a second numerical input from the input device of the computer, the second numerical input being stored in a memory of the computer, and the second numerical input reflecting the assessor'"'"'s perception of how extensively the organizational process or system is deployed.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the first predetermined characteristic is defined to mean that the first numerical input has a value at least as great as the first value, and the second predetermined characteristic is defined to mean that the first numerical input has a value that is less than the first value.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the first predetermined characteristic is defined to mean that the first numerical input has a value that is less than the first value, and the second predetermined characteristic is defined to mean that the first numerical input has a value that is at least as great as the first value.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one of the first and second numerical inputs are on a numerical scale, the scale being 1 to 10, 1 to 100, or 0 to 100 percent.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein if evidence is not identified that supports the first numerical input, then further comprising inhibiting the display of subsequent questions until the evidence is identified or until first numerical input is changed to have the second predetermined characteristic in relation to the first value.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising prompting the assessor to input a third numerical input on an input device of the computer the assessor'"'"'s perception of how well the organizational process or system functions to address the issue, and receiving the third numerical input from the input device, the third input being stored in a memory of the computer, and the third numerical input reflecting the assessor'"'"'s perception of the results achieved by the organizational process or system.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising comparing within a processing unit of the computer the third numerical input to a third value, and, if the third numerical input has a first predetermined characteristic in relation to the third value, then prompting the assessor to identify evidence that supports the third numerical input, and if evidence is identified that supports the third numerical input, then validating the third numerical input for subsequent evaluation, and if the evidence is not identified that supports the third numerical input, then inhibiting validation of the third numerical input until the evidence is identified or until the third numerical input is changed to have a second predetermined characteristic in relation to the third value.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising comparing within a processing unit of the computer the second numerical input to a second value, and, if the second numerical input has a first predetermined characteristic in relation to the second value, then prompting the assessor to identify evidence that supports the second numerical input, and if evidence is identified that supports the second numerical input, then validating the second numerical input for subsequent evaluation, and if the evidence is not identified that supports the second numerical input, then inhibiting validation of the second numerical input until the evidence is identified or until the second numerical input is changed to have a second predetermined characteristic in relation to the second value.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein if evidence is not identified that supports the second numerical input, then further comprising inhibiting the display of subsequent questions until the evidence is identified or until second numerical input is changed to have the fourth predetermined characteristic in relation to the second value.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising evaluating the organizational process or system by comparing numerical inputs from the assessor with known empirically-gathered information.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising using the first and second numerical inputs together to evaluate the organizational process or system.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising multiplying the first numerical input with the second numerical input to evaluate the organizational process or system.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising using differences between the first numerical input and the second numerical input to evaluate the organizational process or system.

14. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving first and second numerical inputs from a plurality of assessors, and determining the standard deviation of the first numerical input, and the standard deviation of the second numerical input, from the numerical inputs received from the assessors, and then using a standard deviation to evaluate at least a portion of the organizational process or system.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein the evidence comprises visible evidence.

16. The method of claim 1 wherein the evidence comprises supporting documentation.

17. The method of claim 1 wherein the evidence comprises visible evidence, and further comprising comparing within a processing unit of the computer the first numerical input to second value, and, if the first numerical input has a first predetermined characteristic in relation to the second value, the prompting the assessor to identify supporting documentation that supports the first numerical input;

and if supporting documentation is identified, then validating the first numerical value for subsequent evaluation, and if the supporting documentation is not identified, then inhibiting the validation of the first numerical input until the supporting documentation is identified or until the first numerical input is changed to have a second predetermined characteristic in relation to the second value.

18. The method of claim 1, further comprising prompting the assessor to input on the input device of the computer an assessment as to whether the organizational process or system is demonstrable, and, if an input is received from the input device that indicates that the organizational process or system is demonstrable, then validating the first numerical input, and, if an input is received from the input device that indicates that the organizational process or system is not demonstrable, then inhibiting validation of the first numerical input until the assessor changes the first numerical input to have a first determined characteristic in relation to a second value.

19. The method of claim 1, further comprising displaying at least one numerical input as a sliding bar on a display device.

20. A machine having a memory which contains data generated by the method of claim 1.

21. A machine having a memory which contains data generated by the method of claim 1, the machine including a computer comprising a processing unit and a memory, and the computer being connected to an input device and a display device.

22. An apparatus adapted to gather information about an organizational process or system, comprising a computer system, the computer system including:

a display device adapted to display computer driven questions;

an input device adapted to transfer inputs from an assessor;

a memory and a processing unit; and

wherein the apparatus is adapted to;

display on the display device computer driven questions, at least some of the computer driven questions being adapted to prompt an assessor who has at least some knowledge about the organizational process or system to numerically input on the input device the assessor'"'"'s perception of the capability of the organizational process or system to address an issue;

receive a first numerical input from the input device, the first numerical input being stored in a memory of the computer, and the first numerical input reflecting the assessor'"'"'s perception of the capability of the organizational process or system to address an issue;

compare within the processing unit the first numerical input to a first value, and, if the first numerical input has a first predetermined characteristic in relation to the first value, then prompt the assessor to identify evidence that supports the first numerical input, and if evidence is identified that supports the first numerical input, then validate the first numerical input for subsequent evaluation, and if the evidence is not identified that supports the first numerical input, then inhibit validation of the first numerical input until the evidence is identified or until the first numerical input is changed to have a second predetermined characteristic in relation to the first value;

display on the display device computer driven questions that are adapted to prompt the assessor to numerically input a second numerical input on the input device of the computer, the second numerical input reflecting the assessor'"'"'s perception of how extensively the organizational process or system is deployed; and

receive a second numerical input from the input device, the second numerical input being stored in a memory of the computer, and the second numerical input reflecting the assessor'"'"'s perception of how extensively the organizational process or system is deployed.

23. The apparatus of claim 22 wherein the apparatus is adapted to inhibit display of subsequent questions until the evidence is identified or until the assessor changes the first numerical input to have a second predetermined characteristic in relation to the first value.