Methods and systems for automatic testing of a relay

• US 5,742,513 A
• Filed: 05/15/1996
• Issued: 04/21/1998
• Est. Priority Date: 05/15/1996
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Hanger Solutions, LLC (IP Investments Group LLC)
• Original Assignee: ABB Power T&D Limited (ABB Limited)
• Inventors: Bouhenguel, Redjem, Garitty, James P.
• Primary Examiner(s): Voeltz, Emanuel T.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Nguyen, Cuong H.
• Application Number:
  US08/647,638
• Time in Patent Office: 706 Days
• Field of Search: 324/418, 324/424, 364/184, 364/492, 364/483, 361/64, 361/68, 361/63, 361/79, 361/66, 361/78, 361/80-81, 361/83, 361/115, 361/85, 361/113, 361/76, 361/91, 371/20.1, 340/870.02, 307/127, 327/333
• US Class Current: 700/286
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/3278 of relays, solenoids or reed switches measuring contact resistance G01R27/205; high voltage magnetic switches G01R31/3271, G01R31/333; testing electric windings G01R31/72; monitoring of fail safe circuits H01H47/002
• CPC Class Codes: H02H 3/044 Checking correct functioning of protective arrangements, e.g. by simulating a fault for differential current circuit breakers H02H3/335

Abstract

A system and method for automatically testing the operation of a protective relay system is disclosed. The system and method provide for continuous testing to ensure proper operation of the protective relay system while the relay remains in service and without interrupting the normal operation of the relay. This testing is performed by storing reference data corresponding to test signals, generating test signals, sampling a specific test signal, processing that test signal through the relay and comparing the processed test signal with the corresponding reference data. Upon detection of an error in the relay, the system and method further provide for isolation of the relay from the electric power system and automatic testing of individual electrical components within the protective relay system to determine the identity of the malfunctioning component. The method of determining the malfunctioning component requires: selecting a component for testing, generating a test signal, providing the test signal as an input to the selected component, processing the test signal through the selected component and the subsequent component in the protective relay system and comparing the processed test signal with corresponding reference data. Finally, the system and method further provide for automatic correction of the malfunctioning component, if possible.

Claims

1. A method for continuous and automatic testing of a protective relay system comprising the steps of:

storing a plurality of sets of reference data, each set corresponding to one of a plurality of test signals;

generating one of the plurality of test signals based on a corresponding set of reference data on a continuous basis and defining the same as a selected test signal;

sampling at a selected interval the selected test signal and defining the same as a sampled selected test signal;

processing the sampled selected test signal in accordance with a predefined procedure to generate an output of test data;

comparing the selected test data with the set of reference data corresponding to the selected test signal and, if based on the comparison, there is a difference, then generating a difference output indicative of improper operation of the protective relay system.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the protective relay system has at least one external output, the method further comprising the steps of:

detecting the difference output; and

disconnecting all external outputs of the protective relay system upon detection of the difference output.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

detecting the difference output; and

generating an error signal upon detection of the difference output.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the selected test signal is indicative of a known sine wave.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

receiving the plurality of sets of reference data from a remote location.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the protective relay system has a local memory, further comprising the steps of:

detecting the difference output; and

storing the difference output in the local memory.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising the step of visibly displaying the difference output.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the protective relay system has a communication means, the method further comprising the steps of:

detecting the difference output; and

transmitting the difference output to a remote location by the communication means.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the protective relay system has a communication means and wherein the selected test signal is chosen and transmitted to the protective relay system from a remote location by the communication means.

10. The method of claim 1, comprising the further steps of:

detecting the difference output; and

activating an audible alarm in response to detecting the difference output.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the protective relay system comprises a plurality of components, the method further comprising the step of automatically determining whether any one of the components is malfunctioning and, if so, defining the same as a faulty component.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising the step of storing the identity of the faulty component in a memory.

13. The method of claim 12, comprising the further step of displaying a visible error message identifying the faulty component.

14. The method of claim 12, further comprising the step of transmitting the identity of the faulty component from the protective relay system to a remote location.

15. The method of claim 11, wherein the faulty component has an automatic recalibration function, the method further comprising the step of transmitting a recalibration signal to the faulty component.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising the further steps of:

recalibrating the faulty component in response to the recalibration signal; and

verifying that the faulty component so recalibrated is no longer malfunctioning.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of sets of reference data are transmitted to the protective relay system from a remote location.

18. The method claim 1, wherein the automatic and continuous testing does not interfere with the normal operation of the protective relay.

19. In a protective relay system comprising a signal interface for receiving power system inputs, a signal processor for processing the power system inputs in accordance with a predefined procedure and a data processor for analyzing the power system inputs as modified, a system for testing conditions of the protective relay system comprising:

a test signal generator for generating a plurality of test signals and for outputting the same to the signal processor;

a selector interfaced to the test signal generator and the signal interface and for selecting at least one of the plurality of test signal to provide an input to the signal processor on a continuous interval, and defining the same as a sampled selected test signal;

the signal processor interfaced to accept the sampled selected test signal and for processing the same in accordance with a predefined procedure to generate an output of selected test data; and

a test signal analyzer interfaced to accept the selected test data for comparing the selected test data with a set of reference data corresponding to the selected test signal resulting in a difference, if any, indicative of improper operation of the protective relay system.

20. A method for identifying a malfunctioning component in a protective relay system, wherein the protective relay system comprises a plurality of components serially interfaced in succession from a first component to a last component and wherein a plurality of sets of reference data are stored in a memory accessible by the protective relay system, each set of reference data corresponding to one of a plurality of test signals, the method comprising the steps of:

selecting one of the plurality of components to test and defining the same as a selected component;

generating one of the plurality of test signals and defining the same as a component test signal;

providing the component test signal as an input to the selected component;

processing the component test signal through the selected component and the components subsequent to the selected component in the succession of components in accordance with a predefined procedure to generate an output of selected component test data; and

comparing the selected component test data with the set of reference data corresponding to the component test signal and if, based on the comparison, there is a difference, generating a difference output indicative of one of (1) improper operation of the selected component and (2) improper operation of one of the components subsequent to the selected component in the succession of components.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein if, based on the comparison, there is no difference, and wherein the selected component is the first component, the method further comprising the step of generating a no fault signal indicative of failure to detect a malfunctioning component in the protective relay system.

22. The method of claim 20, wherein if, based on the comparison, there is a difference, the method further comprising the step of testing the component immediately succeeding the selected component in the succession of components, and defining the same as the selected component.

23. The method of claim 22, the method further comprising the step of defining the component immediately preceding the selected component as a faulty component if no difference output is generated upon testing the selected component.

24. The method of claim 20, wherein if, based on the comparison, there is a difference, and if, the selected component is the last component, the method further comprising the step of defining the selected component as a faulty component.

25. The method of claim 20, further comprising the step of transmitting the difference output from the protective relay system to a remote location.

26. The method of claim 20, wherein if the selected component is a digital signal processor, the selected test signal is a plurality of square waves at least one of which is representative of the value HEX AA and at least one of which is representative of the value HEX 55.

27. The method of claim 20, wherein if the selected component is an analog-to-digital converter, the selected test signal is a plurality of sine waves at least one of which has a magnitude representative of a maximum input value applied to the protective relay system and at least one of which has a magnitude representative of a minimum input value applied to the protective relay system.

28. The method of claim 20, wherein if the selected component is a multiplexor, the selected test signal is a plurality of sine waves of various known magnitudes and angles.

29. The method of claim 20, wherein if, based on the comparison, there is no difference, the method further comprising the step of testing the component immediately preceding the selected component in the succession of components, and defining the same as the selected component.

30. The method of claim 29, further comprising the step of defining the selected component as a faulty component if the difference output is generated upon testing the selected component.

31. A system for automatic and continuous testing of a protective relay system comprising:

a memory means for storing a plurality of sets of reference data each set corresponding to one of a plurality of test signals;

a first processing means coupled to the memory means for generating the plurality of test signals based on corresponding sets of reference data on a continuous basis;

a selection means coupled to the test signal generation means for selecting one of the plurality of test signals and defining the same as a selected test signal;

a second processing means interfaced to accept the selected test signal and for processing the selected test signal in accordance with a predefined procedure to generate an output of selected test data; and

said first processing means being interfaced to accept the selected test data and for comparing the selected test data with the set of reference data corresponding to the selected test signal to identify a difference, if any, indicative of improper operation of the protective relay system.

32. The system of claim 31, further comprising a communication means coupled to the first processing means for communicating with a remote computer.

33. The system of claim 31, wherein the selection means comprises:

a plurality of selectors each being coupled to the first processing means for receiving at least one of the plurality of test signals and to an external source for receiving at least one of a plurality of external input signals for selecting one of (1) the test signals and (2) the external input signals;

a multiplexing means interfaced with the plurality of selectors for selecting an output from one of the plurality of selectors, wherein the selected test signal is provided by the selection of one of the test signals by the selector selected by the multiplexor.

34. The system of claim 33, wherein the plurality of test signals and the plurality of external input signals are analog signals, the system further comprising:

an analog-to-digital converter means interfaced between the multiplexing means and the second processing means to accept the output from the multiplexing means and for converting the same to a digital representation thereof for further processing by the second processing means.

35. The system of claim 33, wherein the first processing means is coupled to each of the plurality of selectors and to the multiplexing means for transmitting a channel selection signal.

36. The system of claim 34, wherein the first and second processing means, the multiplexing means and the analog-to-digital converter means are each interfaced to accept the plurality of test signals from the first processing means.

37. The system of claim 34, wherein the first processing means is coupled to the first converter means and the second processing means for transmitting a recalibration signal or recalibration data.

38. The system of claim 31, wherein the automatic and continuous testing does not interfere with the normal operation of the protective relay.

39. A system for automatic testing of a protective relay system having a plurality of serially connected components in succession from a first component to a last component, comprising:

a test signal generator for generating, on a substantially continuous basis, a test signal based on a predefined set of reference data and outputting the test signal to the first component wherein the test signal is processed by each of the serially connected components in succession resulting in an output from the last component representative of test signal data; and

a test signal analyzer interfaced to receive the output from the last component and comparing, on a substantially continuous basis, the test signal data with the set of reference data and, based on the comparison, detecting a possible malfunction within the protective relay system.

40. The system of claim 39, further comprising:

a component analyzer interfaced with test signal analyzer for automatically testing individual components to identify which of the components is malfunctioning in response to the detection of possible malfunction within the protective relay system.

41. The system of claim 39, wherein the operation of the test signal generator and test signal analyzer and component analyzer do not affect fault detection by the protective relay system.

42. The system of claim 39, wherein the protective relay system is interfaced with a power transmission system, and wherein the protective relay system is automatically isolated from the power transmission system in response to detecting the possible malfunction.

43. The system of claim 40, further comprising:

recalibration means for recalibrating the component identified as malfunctioning.

44. The system of claim 43, wherein the protective relay system is interfaced with a power transmission system, and wherein the protective relay system is automatically isolated from the power transmission system in response to detecting the possible malfunction and wherein the interface between the protective relay system and the power transmission system is automatically restored if the component identified as malfunctioning is correctly recalibrated.