System to assess the starting performance of a turbine

• US 5,748,500 A
• Filed: 11/14/1995
• Issued: 05/05/1998
• Est. Priority Date: 11/14/1995
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Electric Power Research Institute Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Electric Power Research Institute Incorporated
• Inventors: Yannone, Robert Alfred, Quentin, George Heinz
• Primary Examiner(s): Voeltz, Emanuel T.
• Assistant Examiner(s): COLE, TONY MITCHELL
• Application Number:
  US08/557,844
• Time in Patent Office: 903 Days
• Field of Search: 364/551.01, 364/494, 364/184, 364/552, 364/554, 395/180, 395/183.01, 395/183.02, 395/184.01
• US Class Current: 702/182
• CPC Class Codes: F02C 7/26 Starting; Ignition
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 3/00 Registering or indicating the condition or the working of machines or other apparatus, other than vehicles

Abstract

An apparatus and method to assess the performance of a start of a turbine is described. The apparatus includes an accumulator to compare a set of on-line data signals corresponding to the starting performance of the turbine to a set of normative starting parameters so as to identify a set of comparison signals. The comparison signals may also be identified by comparing the set of on-line data signals with a database of historical information relating to starts and design profiles of the turbine. In addition, the comparison signals may be identified by comparing the set of on-line data signals with information in an expert system defining fault conditions in previous starts of the turbine. The comparison signals are processed by an analyzer to identify those comparison signals that exceed predetermined thresholds. Those comparison signals that exceed the predetermined thresholds are processed by a risk factor assessor, which generates quality-of-start predication signals corresponding to the likelihood of success of future starts of the turbine. An anticipator then processes the quality-of-start prediction signals and generates output signals that are used to improve the starting performance of the turbine.

Claims

1. An apparatus to assess the performance of a start of a piece of equipment said apparatus comprising:

an accumulator to compare a set of on-line data signals corresponding to the starting performance of said piece of equipment to a set of normative starting parameters so as to identify a set of comparison signals;

a risk factor assessor to process said comparison signals and generate quality-of-start prediction signals corresponding to the likelihood of success of future starts of said piece of equipment; and

an anticipator to process said quality-of-start prediction signals and generate output signals, including control signal instructions for future starts of said piece of equipment, for use to improve the starting performance of said piece of equipment.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said output signals include one or more of the following signals:

alarm signals, printer output signals, and graphic display signals.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising:

an analyzer to process said comparison signals in reference to a set of predetermined thresholds so as to identify comparison signals that exceed said predetermined thresholds.

4. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said set of normative starting parameters is selected from the group including:

programmed RPM demand signals, load demand signals, compressor surge limiting signals, turbine exhaust design temperature limit signals, and turbine exhaust temperature starting design information signals.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising:

a database of historical information relating to starts and design profiles of said piece of equipment, said database of historical information being accessed by said accumulator to generate said set of comparison signals.

6. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising:

an expert system containing information to identify fault conditions in starts of said piece of equipment, said expert system being accessed by said accumulator to generate said set of comparison signals.

7. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said risk factor assessor utilizes a matrix of weighted risk factor values.

8. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein each weighted risk factor value of said matrix of weighted risk factor values is weighted proportional to its contribution to a predictive conclusion of the likelihood of success of future starts of said piece of equipment.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein each weighted risk factor value is assigned by a technique selected from the group including:

expert consultation, original design criteria, and operating field experience.

10. A method of assessing the performance of a start of a piece of equipment, said method comprising the steps of:

comparing a set of on-line data signals corresponding to the starting performance of said piece of equipment to a set of normative starting parameters so as to identify a set of comparison signals;

processing said comparison signals to generate quality-of-star prediction signals corresponding to the likelihood of success of future starts of said piece of equipment; and

converting said quality-of-start prediction signals into output signals for use to improve the starting performance of said piece of equipment, wherein said converting step includes the step of converting said quality-of-start prediction signals into control signal instructions for future starts of said piece of equipment.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein said processing step includes the step of:

processing said comparison signals in reference to a set of predetermined thresholds so as to identify comparison signals that exceed said predetermined thresholds.

12. The method of claim 10 wherein said set of normative starting parameters of said comparing step are selected from the group including:

programmed RPM demand signals, load demand signals, compressor surge limiting area signals, turbine exhaust design temperature limit signals, and turbine exhaust temperature starting design information signals.

13. The method of claim 10 wherein said comparing step includes the step of comparing said on-line data signals with database signals from a database of historical information relating to starts and design profiles of said piece of equipment to generate said set of comparison signals.

14. The method of claim 10 wherein said comparing step includes the step of comparing said on-line data signals with expert system signals from an expert system containing information regarding fault conditions in starts of said piece of equipment to generate said set of comparison signals.

15. The method of claim 10 wherein said processing step includes the step of using a matrix of weighted risk factor values.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein each weighted risk factor value of said matrix of weighted risk factor values is weighted proportional to its contribution to a predictive conclusion of the likelihood of success of future starts of said piece of equipment.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein each weighted risk factor value is assigned by a technique selected from the group including:

expert consultation, original design criteria, and operating field experience.

18. The method of claim 10 wherein said converting step includes the step of converting said quality-of-start prediction signals into one or more of the following signals:

alarm signals, printer output signals, and graphic display signals.

19. An apparatus to assess the performance of a start of a turbine said apparatus comprising:

an accumulator to compare a set of on-line data signals corresponding to the starting performance of said turbine to a set of normative starting parameters so as to identify a set of comparison signals.

a risk factor assessor to process said comparison signals and generate quality-of-start prediction signals corresponding to the likelihood of success of future starts of said turbine and

an anticipator to process said quality-of-start prediction signals and generate output signals including control signal instructions for future starts of said turbine, for use to improve the starting performance of said turbine.

20. The apparatus of claim 19 further comprising:

an analyzer to process said comparison signals in reference to a set of predetermined thresholds so as to identify comparison signals that exceed said predetermined thresholds.

21. The apparatus of claim 19 wherein said set of normative starting parameters is selected from the group including:

programmed RPM demand signals, load demand signals, compressor surge limiting signals, turbine exhaust design temperature limit signals, and turbine exhaust temperature starting design information signals.

22. The apparatus of claim 19 further comprising:

a database of historical information relating to starts and design profiles of said turbine, said database of historical information being accessed by said accumulator to generate said set of comparison signals.

23. The apparatus of claim 19 further comprising:

an expert system containing information to identify fault conditions in starts of said turbine, said expert system being accessed by said accumulator to generate said set of comparison signals.

24. The apparatus of claim 19 wherein said risk factor assessor utilizes a matrix of weighted risk factor values.

25. The apparatus of claim 24 wherein each weighted risk factor value of said matrix of weighted risk factor values is weighted proportional to its contribution to a predictive conclusion of the likelihood of success of future starts of said turbine.

26. The apparatus of claim 25 wherein each weighted risk factor value is assigned by a technique selected from the group including:

expert consultation, original design criteria, and operating field experience.

27. The apparatus of claim 19 wherein said output signals include one or more of the following signals:

alarm signals, printer output signals, and graphic display signals.