Computerised radar process for measuring distances and relative speeds between a vehicle and obstacles located in front of it

• US 5,768,131 A
• Filed: 10/10/1995
• Issued: 06/16/1998
• Est. Priority Date: 12/31/1992
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Ernst Lissel, Hermann Rohling, Wilfried Plagge
• Original Assignee: Ernst Lissel, Hermann Rohling, Wilfried Plagge
• Inventors: Rohling, Hermann, Plagge, Wilfried, Lissel, Ernst
• Primary Examiner(s): ZANELLI, MICHAEL J
• Application Number:
  US08/492,079
• Time in Patent Office: 980 Days
• Field of Search: 364/426.044, 364/461, 342/47, 342/70, 342/109, 342/127, 180/169
• US Class Current: 701/301
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/286 frequency shift keyed
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/34 using transmission of continuous, frequency-modulated waves while heterodyning the received signal, or a signal derived therefrom, with a locally-generated signal related to the contemporaneously transmitted signal
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/345 using triangular modulation
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/346 using noise modulation
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/584 adapted for simultaneous range and velocity measurements
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/726 Multiple target tracking
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/931 of land vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 7/038 Feedthrough nulling circuits
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 7/2886 using I/Q processing

Abstract

A vehicle radar emits four groups of single-frequency stepped radar pulses. In group A, the frequency of each pulse is a fixed amount higher than that of the preceding pulse. In group B, the frequency of each pulse is a fixed amount lower than that of the preceding pulse. In group C, the frequency of each pulse is the same as that of the preceding pulse. In group D, the frequency of each pulse depends on a modulo algorithm. The signals reflected from other vehicles may readily be processed with inexpensive equipment to discriminate among such other vehicles, and to determine the distance to, and relative speed of, each such vehicle.

Claims

1. A process comprising the steps of:

(a) generating transmit signals by means of an oscillator mounted on a vehicle, the transmit signals comprising a plurality of pulses, each pulse having a constant frequency;

(b) transmitting the transmit signals from the vehicle;

(c) reflecting the transmit signals from obstacles in front of the vehicle, thereby producing reflected signals which also comprise a plurality of pulses, each pulse having a constant frequency;

(d) receiving the reflected signals;

determining a complex sample at the end of each reflected pulse; and

(f) positively distinguishing between real obstacles and apparent obstacles within a short evaluation period by distinguishing between different complex signals from different obstacles.

2. A process comprising the steps of:

(a) generating transmit signals by means of an oscillator mounted on a vehicle;

(b) transmitting the transmit signals from the vehicle;

(c) reflecting the transmit signals from obstacles in front of the vehicle, thereby producing reflected signals;

(d) receiving the reflected signals;

(e) mixing the received reflected signals with the transmit signals to obtain mixed signals;

(f) obtaining in-phase and quadrature phase signals from the mixed signals;

(g) determining a cross-talk signal by forming an average value of received reflected signals for all frequencies of the oscillator which are determined by a control voltage thereof;

(h) subtracting the cross-talk signal from the in-phase and quadrature phase signals to produce modified in-phase and quadrature phase signals;

(i) processing the modified in-phase and quadrature phase signals into output signals relating to the distances and relative speeds between the vehicle and the obstacle.

3. The process of claim 2, wherein the step of forming an average value includes the step of forming a floating average value having an exponentially decaying historical weighting.

4. The process of claim 3, wherein the step of forming a floating average value includes the step of recursively determining, for a particular frequency, an updated average value by the steps of:

(a) multiplying a new sample by a small number Z to produce a weighted new sample;

(b) multiplying a last average value by 1-Z to produce a weighted last average value; and

(c) adding together the weighted new sample and the weighted last average value to produce the updated average value.

5. The process of claim 4, wherein the processing step further comprises the step of removing a quadrature component error by the steps of:

(a) removing an amplitude error component by removing an average value of the in-phase and quadrature phase signals; and

(b) removing a phase error component by phase rotating the in-phase and quadrature phase signals.

6. The process of claim 5, wherein the step of removing a phase error component by phase rotating the in-phase and quadrature phase signals comprises the steps of:

(a) cross-wise addition or subtraction between the in-phase and quadrature phase signals; and

(b) multiplying the quadrature phase signal by the quotient of the average values of the in-phase and quadrature phase signals.

7. The process of claim 5, wherein:

(a) the step of determining the cross-talk signal uses a first time constant;

(b) the step of removing a quadrature component error uses a second time constant; and

(c) the first time constant is greater than the second time constant.

8. A process comprising the steps of;

(a) generating transmit signals by means of an oscillator mounted on a vehicle, the oscillator being controlled to generate successive transmit pulses which;

(1) during a first measurement, have frequencies which increase in linear increments from a minimum value to a maximum value, the number of transmit pulses corresponding to a desired resolution;

(2) during a second measurement, have frequencies which decrease in linear increments from the maximum value to the minimum value;

(3) during a third measurement, have frequencies which are equal to one another; and

(4) during a fourth measurement, have frequencies f(n) in accordance with the relationship;

(A) f(n)=FT+FI*((A n)mod(P))

where;

(B) n=0, . . . , N-1;

(C) N=P-1;

(D) P=a primary number;

(E) A=a natural number selected for the currently effective length N such that N different coefficient occur;

(F) FT=the carrier frequency of the oscillator generating the transmit signals; and

(G) FI=the frequency increment;

(b) transmitting the transmit signals from the vehicle;

(c) reflecting the transmit signals from obstacles in front of the vehicle, thereby producing reflected pulses;

(d) receiving the reflected pulses;

(e) determining a complex signal at an end of each received reflected pulse by;

(1) obtaining received signals, namely, in-phase and quadrature phase signals, from the received reflected pulse; and

(2) mixing the received signals with the corresponding transmit pulse to obtain a frequency difference; and

(f) processing the complex signals into output signals relating to the distances and relative speeds between the vehicle and the obstacle by

(1) during the first, second, and third measurements, converting the received signals into relative speed and distance dependent frequency values by means of a Fourier transformation, whereby;

(A) the frequency values during first, second, and third measurements represent first, second, and third families of intersecting straight lines in a relative speed--distance diagram; and

(B) points of intersection of the intersecting straight lines indicate potential obstacles;

(2) during the fourth measurement,

(A) processing the received signal, which is a complex sample;

(1) y(n)=Σ

(i) k(i)*exp(jφ

i;

n!)!

where;

(2) i=the number of obstacles,

(3) φ

i;

n!=2π

*FI*RI/c/2*((A n )mod(P))+2π

n*VI*FT/(c/2FA)

=the steady state phase value of the obstacle i;

(4) c=the speed of light;

(5) RI=the distance to the obstacle i;

(6) VI=the relative speed of the obstacle i;

(7) FT=the carrier frequency;

(8) FA the sampling frequency; and

(9) KI=the amplitude of signal reflected from the obstacle i;

to recover the phases φ

i;

n! associated with the obstacles i; and

(B) comparing the phases φ

i;

n! with the phases of the points of intersection in the relative speed--distance diagram.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the phase comparing step farther comprises the step of:

(a) ordering the points of intersection into a sequence having decreasing reflection coefficients KI;

(b) correlating;

(1) the conjugate complex phase of the point of intersection having the largest amplitude with

(2) the fourth measurement received signal y(n) in accordance with the functional relationship

(3) W=Σ

(n=0 to N-1) ( y(n)*exp(-jφ

i;

n!));

(c) declaring the points of intersection whose correlation values W have been obtained in this way and which lie below a predetermined value to be phantom obstacles;

(d) reverting in an iterative manner to an appertaining fictitious received signal W/N * exp(-jφ

i;

n!)); and

(e) subtracting the appertaining fictitious received signal from the fourth measurement received signal y(n).