Machine set up procedure using multivariate modeling and multiobjective optimization

• US 5,774,761 A
• Filed: 10/14/1997
• Issued: 06/30/1998
• Est. Priority Date: 10/14/1997
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Xerox Corporation (Xerox Holdings Corp.)
• Original Assignee: Xerox Corporation (Xerox Holdings Corp.)
• Inventors: Rai, Sudhendu
• Primary Examiner(s): Brase, Sandra L.
• Application Number:
  US08/950,086
• Time in Patent Office: 259 Days
• Field of Search: 399/31, 399/38, 399/42, 399/46, 399/47, 399/48, 399/49, 399/72, 395/101, 395/109
• US Class Current: 399/46
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 15/0855 the concentration being measured by optical means
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 15/0865 Arrangements for supplying new developer
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 15/5037 the characteristics being an electrical parameter, e.g. voltage
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 2215/00054 Electrostatic image detection
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 2215/0174 plural rotations of recording member to produce multicoloured copy
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 2215/066 Toner cartridge or other attachable and detachable container for supplying developer material to replace the used material

Abstract

A method of setting up an electrostatographic printing machine having image quality attributes and parameters that control the attributes using multivariate modeling and multiobjective optimization. The method includes providing a discrete number of parameter settings and printing test patterns based upon the parameter settings. The test patterns are scanned to produce a set of image quality values. Using a multivariate adaptive regression splines technique, a model of the printing machine image quality is provided in response to the parameter settings and the image quality values. Optimum parameter settings for the printing machine are then determined from the discrete number of parameter settings to produce consistent image quality.

Claims

1. In an electrostatographic printing machine having operating components with changeable set point parameters, a method setting up the machine using multivariate modeling and multiobjective optimization comprising the steps of:

providing a discrete number of parameter settings and printing test patterns based upon said parameter settings,

scanning the test patterns and producing a set of image quality values based upon the parameter settings,

responding to the parameter settings and the image quality values and using a multivariate adaptive regression splines technique to provide a model of the printing machine image quality, and

determining the optimum parameter settings for the printing machine from the discrete number of parameter settings to produce consistent image quality.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of providing a discrete number of parameter settings and printing test patterns based upon said parameter settings includes the step of using orthogonal arrays.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of determining the optimum parameter settings for the printing machine from the discrete number of parameter settings includes the step of using adaptive simulated annealing.

4. In an electrostatographic printing machine having image quality attributes denoted by a vector p={p₁,p₂, . . . , p_n } and parameters used to setup the machine denoted by x={x₁,x₂, . . . , x_m }, a method of finding appropriate values of each parameter such that the image quality attributes attain desired values comprising the steps of:

identifying the m variables x that affect the n image quality attributes p under consideration,

identifying the range of each variable x between which it can vary,

providing a set of experiments by varying the variables x between respective ranges using orthogonal arrays,

running the machine at different experimental value setting as defined by the orthogonal arrays and measuring the different image quality for each experimental setting,

determining a functional model describing the relationship between each attribute p and the variables x,

upon determining the relationships between image quality attributes and the parameters x, using a multiobjective optimization methodology to obtain a Pareto-optimal setpoint that gives a desired set of image quality attributes, and

in response to a significant conflict in simultaneously obtaining desired image quality attributes, using an interactive multiobjective optimization technique for trading off one image quality attribute in a Pareto-optimal fashion with another until a desired Pareto-optimal solution has been obtained.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the vector p is an n dimensional vector.

6. The method of claim 4 wherein the m parameters are tuned to produce desired image quality attributes p depending upon the parameters x and the parameters x vary between maximum and minimum values.

7. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of providing a set of experiments by varying the variables x between respective ranges using orthogonal arrays includes the step of determining the number of parameters under consideration and the number of intermediate levels of the variables that are chosen.

8. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of determining a functional model describing the relationship between each attribute p and the variables x, is a simple linear regression model.

9. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of determining a functional model describing the relationship between each attribute p and the variables x is a non-linear model.

10. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of determining a functional model describing the relationship between each attribute p and the variables x is the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) model.

11. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of using a multiobjective optimization methodology to obtain a Pareto-optimal setpoint that gives a desired set of image quality attributes includes the step of using a goal programming method of obtaining the Pareto-optimal setpoints.

12. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of using a multiobjective optimization methodology to obtain a Pareto-optimal setpoint that gives a desired set of image quality attributes includes the use of a linear gradient based search algorithm.

13. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of using a multiobjective optimization methodology to obtain a Pareto-optimal setpoint that gives a desired set of image quality attributes includes the use of an adaptive simulated annealing algorithm.

14. In an electrostatographic printing machine having image quality attributes and parameters used to setup the machine, a method of finding appropriate values of each parameter such that the image quality attributes attain desired values comprising the steps of:

identifying the variables that affect the image quality attributes under consideration,

identifying the range of each variable, varying the variables between ranges using orthogonal arrays,

running the machine at different value settings as defined by the orthogonal arrays and measuring the different image quality for each setting,

determining a functional model describing the relationship between each attribute and the variables, and

using a multiobjective optimization methodology to obtain optimal setpoints giving a desired set of image quality attributes.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein the step of using a multiobjective optimization methodology to obtain optimal setpoints giving a desired set of image quality attributes is in response to determining the relationships between image quality attributes and the variables.

16. The method of claim 14 including the step of determining a significant conflict in simultaneously obtaining desired image quality attributes.

17. The method of claim 16 including the step of using an interactive multiobjective optimization technique for trading off one image quality attribute with another until a desired solution has been obtained.

18. In an electrostatographic printing machine having image quality attributes and parameters used to setup the machine, a method of finding appropriate values of each parameter such that the image quality attributes attain desired values comprising the steps of:

identifying variables that affect the image quality attributes,

running the machine at different value settings measuring the different image quality for each setting,

determining a functional model describing the relationship between each attribute and the variables, and

using a multiobjective optimization methodology, obtaining optimal setpoints giving a desired set of image quality attributes.

19. In an electrostatographic printing machine having image quality attributes and parameters used to setup the machine, a method of finding appropriate values of each parameter such that the image quality attributes attain desired values comprising the steps of:

identifying variables that affect the image quality attributes,

running the machine at different value settings measuring the different image quality for each setting,

determining a functional model describing the relationship between each attribute and the variables, and

obtaining optimal setpoints giving a desired set of image quality attributes.