Methods and apparatus to assess and enhance a student's understanding in a subject

• US 5,779,486 A
• Filed: 03/19/1996
• Issued: 07/14/1998
• Est. Priority Date: 03/19/1996
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: IpLearn LLC
• Original Assignee: Ho Chi Fai, Peter P. Tong
• Inventors: Tong, Peter P., Ho, Chi Fai
• Primary Examiner(s): Grieb, William H.
• Application Number:
  US08/618,193
• Time in Patent Office: 847 Days
• Field of Search: 434/332, 434/353, 434/362
• US Class Current: 434/353
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 5/14 with provision for individual teacher-student communication
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/04 characterised by modifying the teaching programme in response to a wrong answer, e.g. repeating the question, supplying a further explanation
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 706/927 Education or instruction

Abstract

An educational method and system that assess and enhance a student'"'"'s understanding in a subject. Based on the student'"'"'s understanding, individually-tailored tests are generated, whose difficulties are geared towards the student'"'"'s level of understanding in the subject. Thus, the student not only can use the tests to prepare for an examination, but can also use the tests to learn the subject. The system includes a score generator coupled to a recommendation generator. In one preferred embodiment, the recommendation generator includes an inference engine, and in another preferred embodiment, the recommendation generator includes a pre-requisite analyzer. Both the pre-requisite analyzer and the inference engine in the recommendation generator can generate recommendations based on the student'"'"'s test results. The recommendation generator is coupled to a report generator and a question generator. The report generator accesses a report format. Based on the recommendations and the report format, the report generator generates a report, which can provide assessment of the student'"'"'s understanding in different areas of the subject, and which can provide action items to improve on the student'"'"'s understanding in the subject. The question generator, based on the recommendations, generates a number of questions. The student can take this new set of questions to further enhance her understanding in the subject.

Claims

1. An educational system for assessing a student'"'"'s understanding in a subject, the system, using latest test results from the latest test taken by the student and the prior-to-the-latest test results, comprising:

a score generator for accessing the student'"'"'s prior-to-the-latest test results and the latest test results; and

a recommendation generator coupled to the score generator for;

accessing a set of analysis rules, with a plurality of the rules being subject-specific; and

analyzing the student'"'"'s prior-to-the-latest and the latest test results using the set of rules to generate a recommendation, which provides an assessment on the student'"'"'s understanding in the subject.

2. A system as recited in claim 1 further comprising:

a student'"'"'s-result-storage medium coupled to the score generator for storing the student'"'"'s test results; and

an analysis-rule-storage medium coupled to the recommendation generator for storing the set of analysis rules.

3. An educational system as recited in claim 1 wherein the score generator also accesses the time that each test was taken, and generates an overall score based on the accessed information;

such that the overall score reflects the student'"'"'s degree of forgetfulness in the subject as a function of time.

4. An educational system as recited in claim 3 wherein:

the subject is divided into line-items with at least one line-item being more difficult than another line-item;

the latest test includes questions with different line-items; and

the score generator generates an overall score for each group of questions having the same line-item;

such that the overall score for each group of questions reflects the student'"'"'s degree of forgetfulness in that group of questions as a function of time.

5. An educational system as recited in claim 3 wherein:

the student'"'"'s prior-to-the-latest test results are weighted differently as compared to the latest test results to generate the overall score; and

the weight depends on whether the student has any handicap in that subject as compared to other students.

6. An educational system as recited in claim 3 wherein:

the student'"'"'s prior-to-the-latest test results are weighted differently as compared to the latest test results to generate the overall score; and

the weight depends on the whether the subject emphasizes on fundamental understanding.

7. An educational system as recited in claim 1 wherein the recommendation generator resolves conflict among one or more rules and the latest test results in order to provide a consistent assessment of the student'"'"'s understanding in the subject.

8. An educational system as recited in claim 7 wherein the recommendation generator further resolves conflict among two or more rules in order to provide a consistent assessment of the student'"'"'s understanding in the subject.

9. An educational system as recited in claim 7 wherein the recommendation generator disables the one or more rules that are in conflict with the latest test results.

10. An educational system as recited in claim 7 wherein the recommendation generator reshuffles the order of application of the rules that are in conflict with the latest test results to resolve the conflict.

11. An educational system as recited in claim 7 wherein:

each rule is associated with a credit;

every time the rule is applied to generate a recommendation and there is no conflict with the test results, the credit for that rule will be increased by an amount;

every time the rule is applied and there is a conflict, the credit for that rule will be decreased by another amount; and

a rule with a higher credit is applied before a rule with a lower credit.

12. An educational system as recited in claim 7 wherein the recommendation generator resolves the conflict by generating a new rule, which would be applied before the one or more conflicting rules so as to resolve the conflict.

13. An educational system as recited in claim 1 wherein:

the subject is divided into line-items with at least one line-item being more difficult than another line-item; and

the analysis rules are pre-requisite rules, which, based on the complexity levels of the line-items, establish a complexity-hierarchy among the line-items; and

the recommendation generator is a pre-requisite analyzer, which determines the student'"'"'s level of understanding in each line-item in at least one test by applying the complexity-hierarchy on the overall scores in at least that test.

14. An educational system as recited in claim 13 wherein for the student to advance to a line-item, the student has to satisfy all of the pre-requisites of that line-item according to the complexity-hierarchy.

15. An educational system as recited in claim 1 wherein:

the subject is divided into line-items with at least one line-item being more difficult than another line-item;

the tests include questions from a plurality of line-items;

the score generator based on the latest and the prior-to-the-latest test results generates an overall score for each line-item in the latest test;

the analysis rules are a set of relationship rules, which determine the relationship among the line-items; and

the recommendation generator is an inference engine, which determines the student'"'"'s level of understanding in each line-item in at least one test by applying the set of relationship rules on the overall scores in at least that test.

16. An educational system as recited in claim 1 wherein:

the subject is divided into line-items with at least one line-item being more difficult than another line-item;

the tests include questions from a plurality of line-items; and

the system further comprises a report generator coupled to the recommendation generator for

accessing a report format; and

generating a report, based on the recommendation and the report format so that the report can provide assessment of the student'"'"'s understanding in each line-item in the tests.

17. An educational system as recited in claim 16 wherein based on the recommendation, the report suggests action items for the student to take to improve on the student'"'"'s understanding in the subject.

18. An educational system as recited in claim 16 further comprising a query processor coupled to the report generator for querying the report.

19. An educational system as recited in claim 1 wherein:

the subject is divided into line-items with at least one line-item being more difficult than another line-item;

the recommendation generator recommends the student to work on a line-item; and

the system further comprises a question generator coupled to the recommendation generator for generating a plurality of questions, which can be categorized into at least two line-items, one being the one suggested by the recommendation, a second being different from the one suggested by the recommendation generator.

20. An educational system as recited in claim 19 wherein the second line-item is further split into two line-items:

one being more difficult than the one suggested by the recommendation, unless the suggested line-item is the line-item at the highest complexity level of the subject; and

the other being less difficult than the one suggested by the recommendation, unless the suggested line-item is the line-item at the lowest complexity level of the subject.

21. An educational system as recited in claim 19 wherein the question generator further prevents duplication in questions previously generated by the system within a preset time from the recently generated questions through comparing every recently generated question with all questions previously generated within the preset time.

22. An educational system as recited in claim 1 wherein the question generator further prevents duplication in questions previously generated by the system from the recently generated questions through comparing every recently generated question with all questions previously generated.

23. An educational system for assessing a student'"'"'s understanding in a subject, which is divided into line-items, with at least one line-item being more difficult than another line-item, the system using the latest test results from the latest test taken by the student, the latest test including questions from a plurality of line item, the system comprising:

a score generator for accessing the student'"'"'s prior-to-the-latest test results, the latest test results, and the time that each test was taken to generate an overall score for each set of questions that belongs to the same line-item, such that each overall score reflects the student'"'"'s degree of forgetfulness as a function of time for that group of questions;

an inference engine coupled to the score generator for;

accessing a set of relationship rules, that define relationship among the line-items;

determining the student'"'"'s level of understanding in each line-item in the latest test by applying the set of relationship rules on the overall scores;

providing recommendation, which at least suggests to the student to work on one line-item;

resolving conflict among one or more relationship rules with the overall scores, and conflict among two or more rules, if there is a conflict, so as to provide a consistent assessment of the student'"'"'s understanding in the subject;

a report generator coupled to the inference engine for;

accessing a report format; and

generating a report, based on the recommendation and the report format so that the report can provide assessment of the student'"'"'s understanding in each line-item of the latest test; and

a question generator coupled to the inference engine for generating a plurality of questions, which can be categorized into at least two complexity levels-one line-item being the one suggested by the recommendation, and a second line-item being different from the one suggested by the recommendation.

24. An educational system for assessing a student'"'"'s understanding in a subject, using the latest test results from the latest test taken by the student, the system comprising:

a test-results-storage medium for storing the student'"'"'s test results; and

a score generator;

for accessing the student'"'"'s latest test results;

for accessing the time that each test was taken;

coupled to the storage medium for accessing the student'"'"'s prior-to-the-latest test results; and

for generating an overall score based on the accessed information;

such that the overall score reflects the student'"'"'s degree of forgetfulness in the subject as a function of time.

25. An educational system as recited in claim 24 wherein:

the subject is divided into line-items with at least one line-item being more difficult than another line-item;

the latest test includes questions with different line-items; and

the score generator generates an overall score for each group of questions having the same line-item;

such that the overall score for each group of questions reflects the student'"'"'s degree of forgetfulness in that group of questions as a function of time.

26. An educational system as recited in claim 24 wherein the latest test results with the overall score is stored in the test-results-storage medium.

27. An educational system as recited in claim 24 wherein:

the student'"'"'s prior-to-the-latest test results are weighted differently as compared to the latest test results to generate the overall score; and

the weight depends on whether the student has any handicap in that subject as compared to other students.

28. An educational system as recited in claim 24 wherein:

the student'"'"'s prior-to-the-latest test results are weighted differently as compared to the latest test results to generate the overall score; and

the weight depends on the whether the subject emphasizes on fundamental understanding.

29. An educational system for assessing a student'"'"'s understanding in a subject, the system, using the latest test results from the latest test taken by the student, comprising:

an analysis-rules-storage medium for storing a set of relationship rules; and

a recommendation generator coupled to the analysis-rules-storage medium for;

accessing the set of relationship rules from the analysis-rule-storage medium;

analyzing the student'"'"'s latest test results using the rules to generate a recommendation; and

resolving conflict among one or more rules and the latest test results in order to provide a consistent assessment of the student'"'"'s understanding in the subject.

30. An educational system as recited in claim 29 wherein the recommendation also depends on the prior-to-the latest test results.

31. An educational system as recited in claim 29 wherein the recommendation generator further resolves conflict among two or more rules in order to provide a consistent assessment of the student'"'"'s understanding in the subject.

32. An educational system as recited in claim 29 wherein the recommendation generator disables the one or more rules that are in conflict with the latest test results.

33. An educational system as recited in claim 29 wherein the recommendation generator reshuffles the order of application of the rules that are in conflict with the latest test results to resolve the conflict.

34. An educational system as recited in claim 29 wherein:

each rule is associated with a credit;

every time the rule is applied to generate a recommendation and there is no conflict with the test results, the credit for that rule will be increased by an amount;

every time the rule is applied and there is a conflict, the credit for that rule will be decreased by another amount; and

a rule with a higher credit is applied to analyze test results before a rule with a lower credit.

35. An educational system as recited in claim 29 wherein the recommendation generator resolves the conflict by generating a new rule, which would be applied before the one or more conflicting rules so as to resolve the conflict.

36. An educational system for assessing a student'"'"'s understanding in a subject, which is divided into line-items with at least one line-item being more difficult than another line-item, the system, using the latest test results from at least one test taken by the student, comprising:

a score generator accessing the student'"'"'s latest test results to generate overall scores; and

a pre-requisite analyzer coupled to the score generator for

accessing pre-requisite rules, which, based on the complexity levels of the line-items, establish a complexity-hierarchy among the line-items; and

determining the student'"'"'s level of understanding in each line-item in the latest test by applying the complexity-hierarchy on the overall scores.

37. An educational system as recited in claim 36 wherein the overall scores also depend on the student'"'"'s prior-to-the-latest test results.

38. An educational system as recited in claim 36 wherein the pre-requisite analyzer generates recommendation for the student based on the determined student'"'"'s level of understanding;

such that the recommendation provides an assessment on the student'"'"'s understanding in the subject.

39. An educational system as recited in claim 36 further comprising an analysis-rule-storage medium for storing the pre-requisite rules.

40. An educational system as recited in claim 38 wherein for the student to advance to a line-item, the student has to satisfy all of the pre-requisites of that line-item according to the complexity-hierarchy.

41. An educational system for assessing a student'"'"'s understanding in a subject, which is divided into line-items with at least one line-item being more difficult than another line-item, using tests with a plurality of line-items taken by the student, the system comprising:

a score generator accessing the student'"'"'s latest test results to generate one or more overall scores for the corresponding one or more line-items in the latest test; and

an inference engine coupled to the score generator for

accessing a set of relationship rules, which determine the relationship among the line-items; and

determining the student'"'"'s level of understanding in the one or more line-items in the latest test by applying the set of relationship rules on the corresponding one or more overall scores in the latest test.

42. An educational system as recited in claim 41 wherein the inference engine generates recommendation for the student based on the determined student'"'"'s level of understanding;

such that the recommendation provides an assessment on the student'"'"'s understanding in the subject.

43. An educational system as recited in claim 41 further comprising an analysis-rule-storage medium for storing the relationship rules.

44. An educational system as recited in claim 41 wherein the overall scores also depend on the student'"'"'s prior-to-the-latest test results.

45. An educational system for assessing a student'"'"'s understanding in a subject, which is divided into the line-items with at least one line-item being more difficult than another line-item, the system using the latest test results from the latest test taken by the student, the latest test including questions from more than one line-item, the system comprising:

a report-storage medium for storing a report format; and

a report generator coupled to the report-storage medium for

accessing the report format;

accessing a recommendation, which is based on the latest test results; and

generating a report, based on the recommendation and the report format so that the report can provide assessment of the student'"'"'s understanding in each line-item in the latest test.

46. An educational system as recited in claim 45 wherein the recommendation is also based on the student'"'"'s prior-to-the-latest test results.

47. An educational system as recited in claim 45 wherein based on the recommendation, the report suggests action items for the student to take to improve on the student'"'"'s understanding in the subject.

48. An educational system as recited in claim 45 further comprising a query processor coupled to the report generator for querying the report.

49. An educational system as recited in claim 47 further comprising a query processor coupled to the report generator for querying the report.

50. An educational system for assessing a student'"'"'s understanding in a subject, which is divided into line-items with at least one line-item being more difficult than another line-item, the system comprising:

a recommendation generator recommending the student to work on a line-item; and

a question generator coupled to the recommendation generator for generating a plurality of questions, which can be categorized into at least two line-items, one being the one suggested by the recommendation, a second being different from the one suggested by the recommendation generator.

51. An educational system as recited in claim 50 wherein the second line-item is further split into two line-item:

one being more difficult than the one suggested by the recommendation, unless the suggested line-item is the line-item at the highest complexity level of the subject; and

the other being less difficult than the one suggested by the recommendation, unless the suggested line-item is the line-item at the lowest complexity level of the subject.

52. An educational system as recited in claim 50 where in the question generator further prevents duplication in questions previously generated by the system within a preset time from the recently generated questions through comparing every recently generated question with all questions previously generated within the preset time.

53. An educational system as recited in claim 50 wherein the question generator further prevents duplication in questions previously generated by the system from the recently generated questions through comparing every recently generated question with all questions previously generated.

55. A system as recited in claim 53 further comprising:

a student'"'"'s-result-storage medium coupled to the score generator for storing the student'"'"'s test results;

an analysis-rule-storage medium coupled to the recommendation generator for storing the set of analysis rules; and

wherein the recommendation also suggests to the student the line-item that the student should study next.

54. An educational system for assessing a student'"'"'s understanding in a subject, which is divided into line-items with at least one line-item more difficult than another line-item, the system, using latest test results from the latest test taken by the student, comprising:

a score generator for accessing the student'"'"'s latest test results; and

a recommendation generator coupled to the score generator for;

accessing a set of analysis rules, with a plurality of the rules being subject-specific; and

analyzing the student'"'"'s latest test results using the set of rules to generate a recommendation, which provides an assessment on the student'"'"'s understanding in the subject;

such that the recommendation includes suggesting to the student the line-item that the student should improve on.