Application integration architecture for a data processing platform

• US 5,797,006 A
• Filed: 07/19/1996
• Issued: 08/18/1998
• Est. Priority Date: 07/21/1995
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Evidan
• Original Assignee: Bull Sas (Atos SE)
• Inventors: Baillif, Christian, Blochet, Marc, Bassier, Jean-Fran.cedilla.ois, Sitbon, Gerard
• Primary Examiner(s): TOPLU, LUCIEN
• Application Number:
  US08/683,413
• Time in Patent Office: 760 Days
• Field of Search: 395/682, 395/184.01, 395/343, 395/602
• US Class Current: 719/320
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/45512 Command shells

Abstract

An application integration architecture (MO) for a data processing platform (PL) constituted by a network (RE) of machines running a plurality of heterogeneous applications (APA), the codes of which are not modifiable and each of which includes a plurality of external interfaces (IE), characterized in that, for the purpose of modifying the basic characteristics of these applications in a way that is transparent to the user, it comprises:

a) an ergonomic integration module (MIG) for the centralized control of the applications with a graphical interface (GI),

b) an operational continuity module (MCF) which executes actions to prevent them from operating abnormally,

c) a module (MSC) for intercepting the dialogues between the components in order to ensure their logical security and the accounting of the resources consumed by the user.

Claims

1. An architecture (MO) for the integration of applications (APA) into a business data processing platform (PL) constituted by an internal network (RE) of machines (PLC1 through PLC4) running a plurality of heterogeneous applications (APA), the codes of which are not modifiable and each of which contains at least some or all of the following external interfaces (IE):

a configuration file (FIG),

a log file (LOG) which records the events related to it,

a mechanism (COM) for communicating between processes running on this machine or these machines,

a set of commands (CD) which make it possible to modify its characteristics,

a set of system resources (RES) which allow it to run,

a set of peripherals (PER) used for its data input/output needs,

characterized in that, for the purpose of modifying the basic characteristics of these applications, in a way that is transparent to the user, relative to their security, availability, ergonomics, administratability, interoperability, monitoring, accounting of the resources consumed by the user, it comprises;

a) an ergonomic integration module (MIG) for centralized control of the applications (APA) with a graphical interface (GI),

b) an operational continuity module (MCF) which, by periodically scanning the log files and by monitoring the components of the applications (APA), executes actions to prevent them from operating abnormally,

c) a module (MSC) for intercepting the dialogues between these components in order to ensure the logical security of the applications (APA) and the accounting of the resources consumed by the user.

2. The integration architecture according to claim 1, characterized in that the ergonomic integration module (MIG) comprises:

a control panel module (MBO) which controls all of the applications,

a command integration module (CWE) with a graphical interface.

3. The integration architecture according to claim 1, characterized in that the continuity module (MCF) comprises:

a module (MBO) for periodically scanning the log files (LOG),

a module (MGE) for defining and executing actions on the platform following an event produced by the scanning module,

a module (MSV) for monitoring the components of the applications, which uses the definition module to prevent any abnormal operation of the application,

a high availability module (MCO) which ensures the continuity of service to the end user of the platform.

4. The integration architecture according to claim 1, characterized in that the interception module (MSC) comprises:

a security module (SEC) which intercepts the dialogues between the processes in order to ensure their logical security,

accounting means (COMP) for the resources consumed by the user.

5. The integration architecture according to claim 2, characterized in that the control panel module (MBO) comprises a set of modules and icons which correspond to the various applications which can run on the business platform (PL), for which two possibilities are offered to the user:

a first mode in which it navigates in a cascading window mode,

a second mode with a single window in which the applications are represented in a single tree which allows direct access to an application by clicking once on the mouse associated with the graphical interface,

wherein the user can switch from the conventional mode to the single-window mode at any time and vice versa.

6. The integration architecture according to claim 5, characterized in that, in the first mode, the control panel module (MBO) manages and administrates all the applications (APA) which are called to run on said platform (PL), by giving a complete, hierarchical view of their organization by class of utilization, wherein the description of this organization, which is separate from the graphical interface (GI) itself, is made in a file (CONFIGS) for describing the cascading structure of the various windows, a file which is located in the machine on which the graphical interface runs (GI).

7. The integration architecture according to claim 2, characterized in that the network (RE) which supports a plurality of communications protocols (PR1 through PR6) and the platform (PL) which includes a control platform (SERV) and target platforms (PLC1 through PLC4), the command integration module (CWE) with a graphical interface (GI) comprises:

a descriptor file (FD) which contains the description of the graphical interface (GI) to be produced in a grammar specific to the integration module (CWE),

grammar verification means (AL), which ensure the lexical consistency of the descriptor file (FD),

graphical representation generating means (MRG) connected to the verification means on the one hand, and to the tools of the graphical interface on the other hand,

syntax checking means (AS) for the information entered by the user into the graphical representation,

encapsulation means (ENC) for the attributes of each command to be executed on the target platform(s) (PLC1 through PLC4), for a plurality of communications protocols (PR1 through PR6),

means for receiving the attributes of each command and for executing it (EXEC1 through EXEC4) based on these attributes.

8. The integration architecture according to claim 4, characterized in that since the business platform (PL) is linked to other business platforms outside itself by means of an external network (REE) and since it has an alarm system (ALARM), the security module (SEC) is formed by a "global firewall" (FW) which has an administration module (FWADM) and which breaks down into a "network firewall" (FWIP) at the level of the external network (REE), into a set of "application firewalls" (FWAPA) at the level of the applications (APA), and into a security server (SSERV) belonging to the business platform (PL) linked to the "applications firewall" (FWAPA), which administration module (FWADM) is linked to the set of "applications firewalls" (FWAPA), to the security server (SSERV), to the "network firewall" (FWIP), and to the configuration files (FIG) of the platform (PL), as well as to the log files (LOG) and to the alarm system (ALARM).