Electro-magnetic desensitizer

• US 5,805,065 A
• Filed: 03/18/1993
• Issued: 09/08/1998
• Est. Priority Date: 05/08/1991
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: 3M Company
• Original Assignee: 3M Company
• Inventors: Schwarz, Werner, Graessle, Josef, Zarembo, Peter J.
• Primary Examiner(s): MULLEN, THOMAS J
• Application Number:
  US08/033,132
• Time in Patent Office: 2,000 Days
• Field of Search: 340/551, 340/572, 340/515, 340/538, 340/310 R, 340/310 A, 340/693, 340/310.01, 335/284, 324/228
• US Class Current: 340/551
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 13/2411 Tag deactivation

Abstract

A magnetic security marker of an article surveillance system is deactivated by first determining the status of the marker by exposing it to the interrogating field. If the marker is active, a deactivation field is applied to the marker. The marker is again interrogated using the interrogating field and, if an active marker is detected, an incrementally increased deactivation field is applied. The marker is continually interrogated and, as long as an active marker is detected, the intensity of the field is incrementally increased until the field reaches a level effecting deactivation.

Claims

1. In an electronic article surveillance system, a method for deactivating a marker that is in a first, activated state, comprising the steps of:

(a) imparting to the marker a deactivation field having a first, predetermined intensity;

(b) exposing the marker to an interrogating field, detecting the response produced by the marker, producing an active marker signal if the response indicates that the marker is in the first, activated state, and producing a deactivated marker signal if the response indicates that the marker is in a second, deactivated state;

(c) imparting to the marker, in response to the active marker signal, the deactivation field having an incrementally greater intensity; and

(d) repeating steps (b) and (c) until the deactivated marker signal is produced.

2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the marker includes at least one magnetizable element.

3. The method according to claim 2 wherein the deactivation field comprises a magnetic field which is directionally constant.

4. The method according to claim 1 wherein the marker is unmagnetized when in the first, activated state, and magnetized when in the second, deactivated state.

5. A deactivating apparatus for deactivating a marker of an electronic article surveillance (EAS) system, the deactivating apparatus comprising:

interrogation means for interrogating the marker to cause the marker to produce a response, for detecting the response produced by the marker, for producing an active marker signal if the response indicates that the marker is in an activated state, and for producing a deactivated marker signal if the response indicates that the marker is in a deactivated state;

deactivation means for applying a deactivation field to the marker in response to the active marker signal, wherein the interrogation means re-interrogates the marker after each application of the deactivation field, and wherein the deactivation field intensity is incrementally increased each time the deactivation field is applied; and

control means for disabling the deactivation means when the deactivated marker signal is produced.

6. The apparatus according to claim 5 wherein the deactivation means includes switch means responsive to the active marker signal for automatically and gradually applying current through a rectifier directly from a source of alternating electrical power to incrementally increase the deactivation field.

7. The apparatus according to claim 6, wherein magnetic flux density required for deactivating the marker is built up by a plurality of rectified voltage pulses from the source of electrical power.

8. The apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the interrogation means interrogates the marker with a substantially sinusoidal interrogation field.

9. The apparatus according to claim 8 wherein the interrogation means includes a wave generator and a coil adapted to produce the interrogation field.

10. The apparatus according to claim 9, further including a yoke proximate to the coil, and configured to create a relatively wide air gap, with the yoke and the coil being adapted to be mounted underneath a table top.

11. The apparatus according to claim 10, wherein the yoke has a substantially U-shaped configuration.

12. An apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the coil includes two terminals, and wherein both terminals of the coil are connected through impedance matching and decoupling capacitors to the wave generator, and further wherein the switch means prevents current from the wave generator from being short-circuited.

13. An apparatus according to claim 9, further including a yoke proximate to the coil comprised of a relatively low coercive force material.

14. The apparatus according to claim 5 wherein the deactivation field is directionally constant.