Method and apparatus for predicting errors in a manufacturing process

• US 5,822,208 A
• Filed: 12/17/1996
• Issued: 10/13/1998
• Est. Priority Date: 04/12/1994
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Bay Instrumentation & Technology Company
• Original Assignee: Bay Instrumentation & Technology Company
• Inventors: Bory, William H.
• Primary Examiner(s): Gordon, Paul P.
• Assistant Examiner(s): BROWN, THOMAS
• Application Number:
  US08/767,006
• Time in Patent Office: 665 Days
• Field of Search: 364/468.01, 364/468.15, 364/468.16, 364/468.17, 364/471.01, 364/471.02, 364/469.01, 364/474.19, 364/550, 364/551.01, 364/552, 364/554 , 364/556, 364/561-563, 382/141, 382/143, 382/152, 493/6-8, 493/10-12, 493/37, 493/51, 493/52, 493/124, 493/125
• US Class Current: 700/108
• CPC Class Codes: B31B 50/006 Controlling; Regulating; Measuring; Improving safety
• CPC Class Codes: B31B 50/622 Applying glue on already formed boxes
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 21/88 Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination

Abstract

An inspection system for a variety of products, and in particular flat-folded corrugated boxes uses real-time statistical processing control. This control allows graphs to be derived from which to develop trends indicative of future flaws in the products. These flaws are automatically corrected once a trend has been established. Glue marks on flat-folded corrugated boxes are identified and measured by means of pixel count, thereby providing very accurate depiction of the amount of glue on a box so that accurate comparison to a standard configuration can be made.

Claims

1. A method for adjusting a process for manufacturing products from blanks, said method operating in real-time to avoid defects in said products during said manufacturing process, said method comprising the steps of:

(a) forming a digital image of each of said products;

(b) comparing each said image to an ideal predetermined image to derive difference measurements between said ideal predetermined image and each formed image, said comparison taking place at a plurality of selected locations on each of said formed images;

(c) determining if said difference measurements exceed predetermined parameters indicative of a flawed product;

(d) sampling difference measurements from a predetermined number of products to form a graph with respect to time versus said difference measurements, said sampled difference measurements falling within a predetermined range indicative of questionable difference measurements;

(e) applying statistical analysis to said graph to develop a trend indicative of future flaws in future products; and

(f) adjusting said process responsive to said trend to avoid said predicted future flaws in said future products.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

(g) storing said difference measurements for a plurality of locations on each said product.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising the step of:

(h) storing a graph of selected difference measurements for selected products.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein said plurality of difference measurements takes place at thirty-two locations on each said product.

5. The method of claim 3, further comprising the step of:

(i) displaying said difference measurements for each of said locations on each of said products.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising the step of:

(j) displaying said graph for each of said sampled measurements.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of said difference measurements is constituted by a comparison of ink density on a sampled product.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein step (c) comprises the sub-step of marking each flawed product with ultra-violet ink.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein step (a) further comprises a preliminary step of inputting data indicative of an ideal image of a product to be manufactured, a range indicative of a flawed product and a range indicative of a questionable product.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein step (a) further comprises the sub-step of determining a position of each blank and adjusting an imager to compensate for variations in blank position.

11. The method of claim 8, wherein step (c) further comprises the sub-step of displaying an indication to an operator each time a flawed product is detected.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein step (c) further comprises the sub-step of stopping blanks from being processed upon detection of a predetermined number of flawed products.

13. An apparatus for controlling a process for manufacturing products from blanks, said apparatus operating in real-time to avoid defects in said products during said manufacturing process, said apparatus comprising:

(a) a digital imager;

(b) means comparing each said image to an ideal predetermined image to derive difference measurements between said ideal predetermined image and each formed image, said means for comparing operating at derived difference measurements at a plurality of selected locations on each of said formed images;

(c) means for determining if said difference measurements exceed predetermined parameters indicative of a flawed product;

(d) means for sampling difference measurements from a predetermined number of products to form a graph with respect to time versus said differences measurements, said means for sampling difference measurements operating to select difference measurements within a predetermined range indicative of questionable difference measurements;

(e) means for applying statistical analysis to said graph to develop a trend indicative of future flaws in future products; and

(f) means for adjusting said blanks responsive to said trend to avoid said predicted future flaws in said future products.

14. The apparatus of claim 13, further comprising:

(g) means for storing said difference measurements for a plurality of locations on each said product.

15. The apparatus of claim 14, further comprising:

(h) means for storing a graph of difference measurements for each said location.

16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein said means for comparing derived difference measurements for thirty-two locations on each said product.

17. The apparatus of claim 15, further comprising:

(i) means for displaying said difference measurements for each of said locations on each of said products.

18. The apparatus of claim 17 further comprising:

(j) means for displaying said graph for each of said sampled measurements.

19. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein at least one of said difference measurements is constituted by a comparison of ink density on a sampled product.

20. The apparatus of claim 13, further comprising:

means for marking each flawed product with ultraviolet ink.

21. The apparatus of claim 13, further comprising means for inputting data indicative of an ideal image of a product to be manufactured, a range indicative of a flawed product and a range indicative of a questionable product.

22. The apparatus of claim 21, further comprising means for determining a position of each blank and adjusting an imager to compensate for variations in blank position.

23. The apparatus of claim 22, further comprising means for displaying an indication to an operator each time a flawed product is detected.

24. The apparatus of claim 23, further comprising means for stopping blanks from being processed upon detection of a predetermined number of flawed products.

25. The apparatus of claim 13, further comprising a second digital imager arranged to form a digital image of areas of each said box containing glue;

means for counting pixels corresponding to said areas containing glue on each said box; and

means for comparing said pixel count corresponding to said areas containing glue to a predetermined ideal pixel count.