Method for wireless communication system planning

• US 5,828,960 A
• Filed: 03/31/1995
• Issued: 10/27/1998
• Est. Priority Date: 03/31/1995
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Google Technology Holdings LLC (Alphabet Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Motorola, Inc. (Motorola Solutions, Inc.)
• Inventors: Tang, Yuqiang, Reed, John Douglas
• Primary Examiner(s): Olms, Douglas W.
• Assistant Examiner(s): VINCENT, DAVID ROBERT
• Application Number:
  US08/415,051
• Time in Patent Office: 1,306 Days
• Field of Search: 455/62, 455/63, 455/67.1, 455/33.1, 455/446-449, 455/429, 455/444, 455/524, 455/568, 379/59, 364/514
• US Class Current: 455/446
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 3/00 Direction-finders for determining the direction from which infrasonic, sonic, ultrasonic, or electromagnetic waves, or particle emission, not having a directional significance, are being received position-fixing by co-ordinating a plurality of determinations of direction or position lines G01S5/00
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 1/246 specially adapted for base stations
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 16/18 Network planning tools

Abstract

A method for wireless communication system planning includes, in a first embodiment, determining an image tree (500), based on a transmitter location (401) and the reflective (415) and diffractive (425) surfaces within a coverage region, and limiting the image tree to exclude branching for higher order images requiring more than a predetermined number of reflections and/or diffractions, or potential child images corresponding to surfaces not within the scope of the parent image (530, 560). Based on the image tree and propagation path back-tracing (620) a received signal quality measure (e.g., power) is determined for each receive location. By comparing the different received signal powers an optimal receiver unit location is determined. Further, by building further image trees for further transmitter locations, an overall coverage quality can be determined for each transmitter and compared to yield an optimal transmitter location.

Claims

1. A computer implemented method of determining signal propagation characteristics for a known environment to determine placement of a receiver comprising:

(a) determining each of plural reflective surfaces and each of plural diffractive surfaces of the known environment;

(b) determining a first image tree for a first transmitter source location within the known environment by;

(i) determining first order images of the first image tree, for each of the plural reflective surfaces and each of the plural diffractive surfaces, the first order image of the plural reflective surfaces or the plural diffractive surfaces having a limited scope;

(ii) determining second and higher order images of the first image tree by repeating step (b)(i), for a predetermined number of reflections and diffractions, such that for each of the plural reflective surfaces and plural diffractive surfaces, respectively, a next order image is determined when the plural reflective surfaces or the plural diffractive surfaces have a scope within the limited scope of the prior order image;

(c) selecting a first receiver location and back-tracing from the first receiver location using the first image tree to determine each one of plural propagation paths from the first receiver location to the first transmitter source location;

(d) determining a signal quality change for said each one of plural propagation paths; and

(e) determining a received signal quality measure at the first receiver location based on the signal quality change for said each one of plural propagation paths for use in the placement of the receiver.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

(f) repeating steps (c) through (e) for plural further receiver locations using the first image tree to determine a received signal quality measure at all of the first and plural further receiver locations.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising:

(g) determining a preferred transceiver location based on the received signal quality measure for all of the first and plural further receiver locations.

4. The method of claim 2, further comprising:

(g) determining transmitter coverage quality based on the received signal quality measure for all of the first and plural further receiver locations; and

(h) repeating steps (b) through (g) for plural further transmitter source locations to determine transmitter coverage quality for all of the first and plural further transmitter source locations, and determining a preferred transmitter location based on the transmitter coverage quality for all of the first and plural further transmitter source locations.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein step (a) further comprises determining structural characteristics of each of the plural reflective and diffractive surfaces.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the structural characteristics for each of the plural reflective surfaces include at least one of the group consisting of location within the known environment and a measure of reflective signal quality loss, and for each of the plural diffractive surfaces include at least one of the group consisting of location within the known environment and a measure of diffractive signal quality loss.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein step (c) back-tracing comprises determining for said each one of plural propagation paths a location of a reflective point for each of the plural reflective surfaces on each one of the plural propagation paths.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein step (d) further comprises, for each one of the plural propagation paths:

(i) determining path segment lengths using the first transmitter source location, the first receiver location, and locations of each of the diffractive surfaces, and each reflective point on one of said each of the plural reflective surfaces, along said one of the plural propagation paths;

(ii) determining a signal quality change for each path segment length based on a free space loss characteristic, for each of the diffractive surfaces based on said measure of diffractive signal quality loss, and for each of the reflective points based on said measure of reflective signal quality loss; and

(iii) determining the signal quality change for said one of the plural propagation paths by summing together each signal quality change for each path segment length, each of said diffractive surfaces and each of said reflective points.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein step (c) further comprises:

(i) selecting a current image, having a corresponding first surface, of the image tree;

(ii) determining if the first surface is on a first propagation path to the first receiver location by back-tracing from the first receiver location to the first transmitter source location;

and step (d) further comprises;

(i) determining path segment lengths using the first transmitter source location, the first receiver location, and locations of each reflective point and each of the diffractive surfaces along the first propagation path;

(ii) determining a signal quality change for each path segment length based on a free space loss characteristic, for each of the diffractive surfaces based on said measure of diffractive signal quality loss, and for each of the reflective points for each of the plural reflective surfaces based on said measure of reflective signal quality loss, and cumulating each signal quality change determined in a cumulative signal quality change; and

(iii) when the cumulative signal quality change exceeds a predetermined threshold, stopping the back-tracing of said first propagation path and setting the cumulative signal quality change for the first propagation path to zero contribution;

wherein steps (c) and (d) are repeated for each image, other than any child images of the current image, of the first image tree.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the signal quality change is a measure of signal power loss.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein step (e) comprises multiplying each measure of signal power loss determined in step (d) by a predetermined signal power level to determine a signal power measure for each of the plural propagation paths, and cumulating each signal power measure determined for each one of the plural propagation paths to form the received signal quality measure.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein step (d) and the step of cumulating each signal power measure in step (e) are performed after said each one of plural propagation paths is back-traced, and step (d)(iii) further comprises, when a difference of the signal power measure cumulated minus a product of the cumulative signal quality change multiplied by the predetermined signal power level exceeds a predetermined relative power threshold, stopping the back-tracing of said one of the plural propagation paths and setting the cumulative signal quality change to zero contribution.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the predetermined number of reflections and diffractions is equal to two reflections and three diffractions.

14. A computer implemented method of determining signal propagation characteristics for a first transmitter having a first transmitter source location within a known environment having plural reflective surfaces and plural diffractive surfaces, the method utilized to determine placement of a receiver, the method comprising:

(a) determining a first receiver location and, using a predetermined first image tree for the first transmitter source location, back-tracing from the first receiver location using the predetermined first image tree to determine a location of a reflective point for each of the plural reflective surfaces on one of a plurality of propagation paths, step (a) further comprising;

(i) selecting a current image, having a corresponding first surface, of the image tree;

(ii) determining if the first surface is on a first propagation path to the first receiver location by back-tracing from the first receiver location to the first transmitter source location;

(b) determining a signal quality change for each of the plural propagation paths, step (b) further comprising;

(i) determining path segment lengths using the first transmitter source location, the first receiver location, and locations of each reflective point and each of the diffractive surfaces along the first propagation path;

(ii) determining a signal quality change for each path segment length based on a free space loss characteristic, for each of the diffractive surfaces based on said measure of diffractive signal quality loss, and for each of the reflective points for each of the plural reflective surfaces based on said measure of reflective signal quality loss, and cumulating each signal quality change determined in a cumulative signal quality change; and

(iii) when the cumulative signal quality change exceeds a predetermined threshold, stopping the back-tracing of said first propagation path and setting the cumulative signal quality change for the first propagation path to zero contribution; and

(c) determining a received signal quality measure at the first receiver location based on the signal quality change for each of the plural propagation paths for use in the placement of the receiver.

15. The method of claim 14, further comprising:

(d) repeating steps (a) through (c) for plural further receiver locations using the predetermined first image tree to determine a received signal quality measure at all of the first and plural further receiver locations.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising:

(e) determining a preferred transceiver location based on the received signal quality measure for all of the first and plural further receiver locations.

17. The method of claim 15, further comprising:

(e) determining transmitter coverage quality based on the received signal quality measure for all of the first and plural further receiver locations; and

(f) repeating steps (a) through (e) for plural further transmitter source locations to determine transmitter coverage quality for all of the first and plural further transmitter source locations, and determining a preferred transmitter location based on the transmitter coverage quality for all of the first and plural further transmitter source locations.

18. A computer implemented method of determining an image tree for use in determining signal propagation characteristics for a known environment to determine placement of a receiver, the image tree associated with a source having a location within the known environment, the known environment having plural reflective surfaces and plural diffractive surfaces, comprising:

(i) determining first order images of the first image tree by determining, for each of the plural reflective surfaces and each of the plural diffractive surfaces, respectively, the first order image having a limited scope;

(ii) determining second and higher order images of the image tree by repeating step (i), for a predetermined number of reflections and diffractions, such that for each of the plural reflective surfaces and plural diffractive surfaces, respectively, a next order image is determined when the plural reflective surfaces or the plural diffractive surfaces have a scope within the limited scope of the prior order image for use in the placement of the receiver.