Refuse weighing system and method

• US 5,837,945 A
• Filed: 04/24/1996
• Issued: 11/17/1998
• Est. Priority Date: 04/24/1996
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Hardy Process Solutions
• Original Assignee: Hardy Instruments, Inc. (Roper Technologies, Inc.)
• Inventors: Cornwell, David M., Ness, David A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Williams, Hezron E.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Gibson, Randy W.
• Application Number:
  US08/639,904
• Time in Patent Office: 937 Days
• Field of Search: 177/136, 177/145, 177/25.14, 177/139, 177/45
• US Class Current: 177/136
• CPC Class Codes: B65F 2003/022 the discharging means comprising a device for determining the weight of the content of refuse receptacles
• CPC Class Codes: B65F 2003/0279 the discharging means mounted at the front of the vehicle
• CPC Class Codes: B65F 3/04 Linkages, pivoted arms, or pivoted carriers for raising and subsequently tipping receptacles
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 19/083 lift truck scale
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 23/3728 with wireless means
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 23/3735 using a digital network

Abstract

A weighing system for determining the weight of material deposited from a container into a collection truck for collecting refuse or recyclable material includes at least one load cell installed into a lifting fork of the truck lifting arm for producing output signals based on the load on the arm as the full container is lifted and the emptied container is lowered. An acceleration or angle sensor is also provided on the lifting arm for sensing the acceleration or angle of the arm and producing a corresponding output signal. A processing unit receives the load cell and sensor outputs during raising and lowering of the lifting arm, and calculates the dynamic weight of the refuse lifted and deposited from the container, using the sensor output to compensate for the angle or G forces on the arm.

Claims

1. A weighing system for a refuse or recycling truck, comprising:

a lifting arm movably secured to the truck at one end and having lifting forks at an opposite end having lifting portions for engaging a container, the lifting arm being movable between a lower position for engaging a container, a raised position for depositing material from the container into the truck, and back to the lowered position to release the emptied container;

a load cell incorporated into each lifting fork for detecting the load carried by the lifting fork and providing an output signal proportional to the load;

each fork comprising an elongate member and the associated load cell being installed along the length of the elongate member in line with the fork at a location spaced rearwardly from said lifting portion whereby a container does not directly engage said load cells;

at least one acceleration sensor on the lifting arm for sensing G level on the arm and producing an output proportional to the sensed forces;

a processing unit connected to the load cell and acceleration sensor outputs for receiving the output signals of the load cells and acceleration sensor at least for a predetermined time period as the arm is raised and for the same time period as the arm is lowered; and

the processing unit including means for compensating the load cell output signals for acceleration forces and inclination of the lifting arm, means for calculating the dynamic gross weight carried by the lifting forks as a container is raised and means for calculating the tare weight as the same container is lowered after emptying for each set of sensor outputs, and means for calculating the net weight of material deposited into the truck from the container based on the calculated dynamic weights.

2. The system as claimed in claim 1, including a switch and an actuator for engaging the switch at a predetermined position during raising the arm and disengaging the switch at a corresponding position during lowering the arm, the switch output being connected to said processing unit, the processing unit further including means for using a predetermined number of sensor outputs after engagement of the switch to calculate the dynamic gross weight of the container and contents and using an equivalent number of sensor outputs prior to disengagement of the switch to calculate the dynamic tare weight of the emptied container.

3. The system as claimed in claim 2, wherein the switch is positioned for engagement by the actuator when the lifting arm is at a predetermined angle to the horizontal.

4. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the processing unit includes means for computing the G force level on the arm for each set of sensor outputs, means for determining when the G level is at a predetermined level as the arm is lifted and using the corresponding sensor outputs to calculate the dynamic weight of the container and contents when the G level is at the predetermined level, means for determining when the G level is approximately 1 G as the arm is lowered and using the corresponding sensor outputs to calculate the dynamic weight of the emptied container only while the G level is at the predetermined level.

5. The system as claimed in claim 1, including a first filter between the load cells and the processing unit and a second filter between the accelerometer and the processing unit, the filters comprising means for filtering noise from the sensor output signals.

6. The system as claimed in claim 5, wherein the filters are digital filters.

7. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the load cells and accelerometer are all located at approximately the same distance from said one end of the lifting arm.

8. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said load cells and acceleration sensor each have an embedded memory chip, each memory chip having stored information including a part identification number for maintenance purposes.

9. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein each fork has a cut along its length forming opposing cut ends, and the load cell being mounted between the cut ends of the fork.

10. The system as claimed in claim 9, including at least one overload bolt extending across each load cell, the overload bolt being rigidly linked to one cut end of the fork and being connected to the opposing cut end with a predetermined amount of free play, whereby the overload bolt forms a rigid connection bypassing the load cell if loads above a predetermined level are placed on the fork.

11. The system as claimed in claim 10, wherein the predetermined load level is in the range from 10,000 to 17,500 lbs.

12. The system as claimed in claim 10, including two overload bolts extending across each load cell.

13. The system as claimed in claim 1, including a storage unit for storing the net weight of material deposited along with customer identification information, a remote host computer including stored information on customer names and addresses and collection routes, and a transfer device for transferring stored information from a truck processing unit to the host computer, and the host computer including processing means for generating customer invoices based on the deposited weight information for respective customers.

14. The system as claimed in claim 13, wherein the truck processing means includes means for receiving and storing information from a truck driver on damaged or missing containers at any collection site, and the processing means of the host computer includes means for generating missing and lost can reports.

15. The system as claimed in claim 14, wherein the truck processing unit includes means for operator entry of information regarding any collection site where access to a container is blocked, and the host computer processing means includes means for generating a report for notifying a customer in the event that access to the customer'"'"'s container was blocked.

16. The system as claimed in claim 13, wherein the host computer includes means for receiving and storing customer complaints, means for generating collection routes for a plurality of trucks, including any customer complaints associated with any collection site on a route, and means for transferring each route and any associated customer complaints to a respective truck processing unit.

17. The system as claimed in claim 1, including a display unit for mounting in a truck to display the calculated net weight of material deposited from each container on a route.

18. A weighing system for a refuse or recycling truck, comprising:

a lifting arm movably secured to the truck at one end and having lifting forks at an opposite end for engaging a container, the lifting arm being movable between a lower position for engaging a container, a raised position for depositing material from the container into the truck, and back to the lowered position to release the emptied container;

a load cell incorporated into each lifting fork for detecting the load carried by the lifting fork and providing an output signal proportional to the load;

at least one acceleration sensor on the lifting arm for sensing G level on the arm and producing an output proportional to the sensed forces;

a processing unit connected to the load cell and acceleration sensor outputs for receiving the output signals of the load cells and acceleration sensor at least for a predetermined time period as the arm is raised and for the same time period as the arm is lowered;

the processing unit including means for compensating the load cell output signals for acceleration forces and inclination of the lifting arm, means for calculating the dynamic gross weight carried by the lifting forks as a container is raised and means for calculating the tare weight as the same container is lowered after emptying for each set of sensor outputs, and means for calculating the net weight of material deposited into the truck from the container based on the calculated dynamic weights; and

the processing unit further comprising means for receiving the accelerometer output when the lifting arm is up and stationary, means for determining whether the forks are folded or non-folded based on the detected G level, and means for producing an alarm signal to notify the driver if the forks are not folded.

19. A method of calculating the net weight of material deposited from a refuse or recycling container into a refuse or recycling truck, comprising the steps of:

installing a load cell along the length of at least one lifting fork of a truck lifting arm at a location spaced rearwardly of a container contacting portion of the arm such that the load cell does not contact a container during lifting;

providing a first series of output signals from the load cell at predetermined intervals as the lifting fork is raised with a loaded container and a second series of output signals at predetermined intervals as the fork is lowered with the emptied container;

providing a third series of output signals from at least one angle sensing device installed on the lifting arm as the arm is raised and lowered;

using the output signals from the angle sensing device to correct the load cell output signal for fork angle;

calculating a first dynamic gross weight of the container and contents as the lifting fork is raised using the corrected load cell outputs from a predetermined portion of the lifting cycle;

calculating a second dynamic tare weight of the emptied container as the lifting fork is lowered using the corrected load cell outputs from a predetermined portion of the lowering cycle;

subtracting the second tare weight from the first gross weight to determine the net weight of material deposited in the refuse truck;

storing the computed deposited material net weight; and

repeating the procedure for each container emptied along a truck collection route.

22. The method as claimed in claim 19, wherein the angle sensing device comprises at least one accelerometer.

23. The method as claimed in claim 22, including the steps of detecting the accelerometer output signal when the forks are stationary after a container has been emptied and returned to the ground, determining the G level from the accelerometer output signal, and producing an alarm if the G level is not approximately equal to 1 G.

24. The method as claimed in claim 19, including the steps of loading a truck pick up route on a memory card, installing the memory card on a memory card reader in a truck computer, and displaying the route to the driver of the truck, storing the computed deposited weight for each stop on the route on the memory card, transferring the memory card to a host computer at the end of the route, and using the stored weights on the memory card to generate invoices based on deposited weight for each customer on the route.

27. The method as claimed in claim 19, wherein the step of calculating the first dynamic gross weight comprises the steps of taking load cell and sensing device outputs at at least two different positions in the lifting cycle, and using the difference between the two sets of outputs to determine the first dynamic gross weight, and the step of calculating the second dynamic tare weight comprises the steps of taking the load cell and sensing device outputs at at least two different positions in the lowering cycle and using the difference between the two sets of outputs to determine the second dynamic tare weight.

20. A method of calculating the net weight of material deposited from a refuse or recycling container into a refuse or recycling truck, comprising the steps of:

installing a load cell along the length of at least one lifting fork of a truck lifting arm;

providing a first series of output signals from the load cell at predetermined intervals as the lifting fork is raised with a loaded container and a second series of output signals at predetermined intervals as the fork is lowered with the emptied container;

providing a third series of output signals from at least one angle sensing device installed on the lifting arm as the arm is raised and lowered;

using the output signals from the angle sensing device to correct the load cell output signal for fork angle;

calculating a first dynamic gross weight of the container and contents as the lifting fork is raised using the corrected load cell outputs from a predetermined portion of the lifting cycle;

calculating a second dynamic tare weight of the emptied container as the lifting fork is lowered using the corrected load cell outputs from a predetermined portion of the lowering cycle;

computing the G level for each load cell output signal based on the output of the angle sensing device as that signal is taken, determining if the G level is close to 1 G, and using the load cell output signals corresponding to periods when the G level is close to 1 G to calculate the first and second dynamic weights;

subtracting the second tare weight from the first gross weight to determine the net weight of material deposited in the refuse truck;

storing the computed deposited material net weight; and

repeating the procedure for each container emptied along a truck collection route.

21. The method as claimed in claim 20, further including the steps of detecting when the orientation of the lifting arm is close to a predetermined angle as the arm is raised and lowered, and using a predetermined number of load cell output signals after the arm reaches that orientation during the lifting cycle to calculate the first dynamic gross weight, and using a corresponding number of load cell output signals prior to the arm reaching the predetermined orientation in the lowering cycle to calculate the second dynamic tare weight if the detected G level is not determined to be close to 1 G at any time during the lifting and lowering cycles.

25. A method of calculating the net weight of material deposited from a refuse or recycling container into a refuse or recycling truck, comprising the steps of:

installing a load cell along the length of at least one lifting fork of a truck lifting arm;

providing a first series of output signals from the load cell at predetermined intervals as the lifting fork is raised with a loaded container and a second series of output signals at predetermined intervals as the fork is lowered with the emptied container;

providing a third series of output signals from at least one angle sensing device installed on the lifting arm as the arm is raised and lowered;

using the output signals from the angle sensing device to correct the load cell output signal for fork angle;

calculating a first dynamic gross weight of the container and contents as the lifting fork is raised using the corrected load cell outputs from a predetermined portion of the lifting cycle;

calculating a second dynamic tare weight of the emptied container as the lifting fork is lowered using the corrected load cell outputs from a predetermined portion of the lowering cycle;

subtracting the second tare weight from the first gross weight to determine the net weight of material deposited in the refuse truck;

storing the computed deposited material net weight;

repeating the procedure for each container emptied along a truck collection route; and

detecting if the same container is raised and emptied a second time at a single collection site, determining a second net weight of material dumped from the container during a second lifting and lowering cycle if a second dump of the same container is detected, and adding the second net weight to the first mentioned net weight to determine the total weight of material dumped from the container, and storing the total weight.

26. The method as claimed in claim 25, wherein the step of detecting a second dump from the same container comprises detecting a second raising and lowering cycle within a predetermined time period after an initial raising and lowering cycle, and adding the net weight to the previously determined net weight if a second raising and lowering cycle is detected within said predetermined time period.

28. A weighing system for a material collecting truck for collecting materials from containers at a plurality of collection sites, the system comprising:

a lifting arm movably mounted on the truck at one end and having lifting forks at the opposite end for engaging a container, the lifting arm being movable in a lifting cycle between a lower position for engaging a container and a raised position for depositing material from the container into the truck, and movable in a lowering cycle from the raised position back to the lower position to release the emptied container;

a load cell incorporated into each lifting fork for detecting load carried by the lifting fork and providing a first output signal proportional to the load;

at least one angle sensor on the lifting arm for producing a second output signal proportional to the angle of the lifting forks;

a processing unit connected to the load cell and angle sensor outputs for receiving a first set of first and second output signals at at least one predetermined position of the lifting arm prior to emptying a lifted container and receiving a second set of first and second sensor outputs at at least one predetermined position of the lifting arm prior to release of the emptied container; and

the processing unit including means for calculating a first gross weight of the container and contents using the first set of output signals, means for calculating the tare weight of the emptied container using the second set of sensor output signals, the means for calculating the gross and tare weights comprising means for determining the G level from the angle sensor output, means for determining a weight on the lifting fork from the load cell output, and means for dividing the determined weight by the determined G level, and means for calculating the net weight of material deposited from the container into the truck by subtracting the tare weight from the gross weight.

29. The system as claimed in claim 28, wherein the first and second sets of sensor outputs are taken while the lifting arm is stationary.

30. The system as claimed in claim 28, wherein the first and second sets of sensor outputs are taken while the lifting arm is moving.

31. The system as claimed in claim 28, including a plurality of angle sensors.

32. A weighing system for a material collecting truck for collecting materials from containers at a plurality of collection sites, the system comprising:

a lifting arm movably mounted on the truck at one end and having lifting forks at the opposite end for engaging a container, the lifting arm being movable in a lifting cycle between a lower position for engaging a container and a raised position for depositing material from the container into the truck, and movable in a lowering cycle from the raised position back to the lower position to release the emptied container;

a load cell incorporated into each lifting fork for detecting load carried by the lifting fork and providing a first output signal proportional to the load;

a plurality of angle sensors on the lifting arm for producing a second output signal proportional to the angle of the lifting forks, each angle sensor comprising an accelerometer;

a processing unit connected to the load cell and angle sensor outputs for receiving a first set of first and second output signals at at least one predetermined position of the lifting arm prior to emptying a lifted container and receiving a second set of first and second sensor outputs at at least one predetermined position of the lifting arm prior to release of the emptied container; and

the processing unit including means for calculating a first gross weight of the container and contents using the first set of signals, means for calculating the tare weight of the emptied container using the second set of sensor outputs, and means for calculating the net weight of material deposited from the container into the truck by subtracting the tare weight from the gross weight.

33. A method of calculating the net weight of material deposited from a container into a collection truck, comprising the steps of:

installing a load cell along the length of at least one lifting fork of a truck lifting arm;

engaging and lifting a container from the ground on the lifting arm in a lifting cycle up to a raised, inverted position to deposit material from the container into the truck;

providing at least one first output signal from the load cell at at least one predetermined position in the lifting cycle;

providing at least one second output signal from an angle sensing device at said one predetermined position;

calculating a first gross weight of the container and contents using said first and second output signals;

lowering the container from the raised, inverted position back to the ground in a lowering cycle;

providing at least one third output signal from the load cell at at least one predetermined position in the lowering cycle;

providing at least one fourth output signal from the angle sensing device at said predetermined position in the lowering cycle;

calculating a second tare weight of the emptied container from the third and fourth output signals;

the steps of calculating the first gross weight and the second tare weight each comprising determining the G level from the angle sensor output, determining a weight carried on the lifting fork from the load cell output, and dividing the determined weight by the determined G level;

subtracting the second tare weight from the first gross weight to determine the net weight of material deposited in the truck;

storing the computed net weight; and

repeating the procedure for each container emptied along a collection route.

34. The method as claimed in claim 33, wherein the lifting arm is stopped at said predetermined positions in the lifting and lowering cycles as said output signals are taken.

35. The method as claimed in claim 33, wherein said output signals are taken as the arm is moving in both said lifting and lowering cycles.

36. The method as claimed in claim 33, wherein two sets of output signals are provided from the load cell and angle sensing device at two different positions in both the lifting cycle and the lowering cycle, and the gross weight and tare weight are calculated based on the difference between the two sets of readings.