Computed tomography metrology

• US 5,848,115 A
• Filed: 05/02/1997
• Issued: 12/08/1998
• Est. Priority Date: 05/02/1997
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: General Electric Company
• Original Assignee: General Electric Company
• Inventors: Janning, John C., Little, Francis H.
• Primary Examiner(s): Porta, David P.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Bruce, David Vernon
• Application Number:
  US08/850,673
• Time in Patent Office: 585 Days
• Field of Search: 378/4, 378/901, 382/141, 382/152, 364/468.17, 364/468.16
• US Class Current: 378/4
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2223/419 computed tomograph
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 23/046 using tomography, e.g. computed tomography [CT]
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 17/00 Three dimensional [3D] modelling, e.g. data description of 3D objects
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 378/901 Computer tomography program or processor

Abstract

The invention is a three-dimensional computed tomography method for inspecting and comparing actual geometry to predetermined geometry of an object. The method includes the following steps: A) three-dimensionally scanning the object using computed tomography to produce multiple slices of actual geometrical data of the object; B) processing the multiple slices of actual geometrical data into actual boundary data which defines internal and external boundaries of the object; and C) producing actual point cloud data from the actual boundary data. The method further includes comparing the actual point cloud data to object geometry predetermined data. The comparing may include outputting an image comparing the point cloud data to the predetermined data and the image may represent the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data. The image may be rotated to present the non-conformance from different viewpoints around the feature.

Claims

1. A method for comparing actual geometry to predetermined geometry of an object, the method comprising:

three-dimensionally scanning the object using computed tomography (CT) to produce multiple slices of actual geometrical data of the object;

processing said multiple slices of actual geometrical data into actual boundary data which defines internal and external actual boundaries of the object and features of the object; and

producing point cloud data from the actual boundary data.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising comparing the point cloud data to object geometry predetermined data.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein said comparing of the point cloud data to the predetermined data includes registrating the point cloud data to coordinates of the predetermined data.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the predetermined data is computer aided design (CAD) data and registration is made to CAD coordinates of the predetermined data.

5. The method of claim 3 wherein said comparing includes outputting an image comparing the point cloud data to the predetermined data.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein said outputting includes producing an image representing the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein said outputting an image includes displaying the image on a color computer monitor.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein said displaying the image includes displaying a plurality of pixels representing the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data.

9. The method of claim 5 wherein the image is an image of an interior feature of the object.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein said outputting includes producing an image representing the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein said outputting an image includes displaying the image on a color computer monitor.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein said displaying the image includes displaying a plurality of pixels representing the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data of the interior feature of the object.

13. The method of claim 3 further comprising comparing an actual geometric definition to a predetermined geometric definition of a feature of the object.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein said comparing the actual geometric definition to the predetermined geometric definition of the feature of the object comprises:

generating a curve fitted geometry of the point cloud data representing the feature,

calculating the actual geometric definition from the curve fitted geometry, and

comparing the actual geometric definition to the predetermined geometric definition.

15. A method for comparing actual geometry to predetermined geometry of an object, the method comprising:

three-dimensionally scanning the object using computed tomography (CT) to produce multiple slices of actual geometrical data of the object;

processing said multiple slices of actual geometrical data into actual boundary data which defines internal and external actual boundaries of the object and features of the object;

producing point cloud data from the actual boundary data;

comparing the point cloud data to object geometry predetermined data wherein said comparing of the point cloud data to the predetermined data includes registrating the point cloud data to coordinates of the predetermined data and outputting an image comparing the point cloud data to the predetermined data wherein the image is an image of an interior feature of the object;

said outputting includes producing an image representing the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data and displaying the image on a color computer monitor by displaying a plurality of pixels representing the geometry of non-conformance between the point cloud data and the predetermined data of the interior feature of the object which is a core.

16. A method for comparing actual geometry to predetermined geometry of an object, the method comprising:

three-dimensionally scanning the object using computed tomography (CT) to produce multiple slices of actual geometrical data of the object;

processing said multiple slices of actual geometrical data into actual boundary data which defines internal and external actual boundaries of the object and features of the object;

producing point cloud data from the actual boundary data;

comparing the point cloud data to object geometry predetermined data wherein said comparing of the point cloud data to the predetermined data includes registrating the point cloud data to coordinates of the predetermined data; and

comparing an actual geometric definition to a predetermined geometric definition of a feature of the object by generating a curve fitted geometry of the point cloud data representing the feature, calculating the actual geometric definition from the curve fitted geometry, and comparing the actual geometric definition to the predetermined geometric definition wherein the object is a cooled turbine airfoil having at least one plurality of turbine cooling holes extending from an internal cavity through an outer wall of the airfoil.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein said comparing of the point cloud data to the predetermined data further comprises generating a curve fitted geometry of the cooling holes by curve fitting a predetermined shape of each of the holes to the point cloud data representing the holes.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein said each of said holes is axisymmetric having a predetermined axis and said predetermined axis is compared to an actual axis calculated from geometry of the curve fitted geometry.

19. The method of claim 18 wherein said comparing the actual geometric definition to the predetermined geometric definition includes displaying images of said predetermined axis and said actual axis on a computer monitor.

20. The method of claim 19 wherein said comparing the actual geometric definition to the predetermined geometric definition further includes rotating the displayed images of the predetermined axis and the actual axis on a computer monitor to view nonconformance between the predetermined axis and the actual axis from different viewpoints around the cooling hole.