Evaluating the work capacity of injured people

• US 5,848,594 A
• Filed: 06/07/1995
• Issued: 12/15/1998
• Est. Priority Date: 08/16/1993
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Leonard N. Matheson
• Original Assignee: Leonard N. Matheson
• Inventors: Matheson, Leonard N.
• Primary Examiner(s): Lacyk, John P.
• Application Number:
  US08/482,234
• Time in Patent Office: 1,287 Days
• Field of Search: 128/897-98, 128/696, 128/706, 128/707, 128/774, 600/509, 600/519, 600/520, 600/587
• US Class Current: 128/898
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/22 Ergometry; Measuring muscular strength or the force of a muscular blow exercising apparatus A63B21/00 ; measuring of work or force in general G01L

Abstract

Methods are provided for evaluating the physical work capacity of a person by determining maximum acceptable lifting weight. The methods may also provide a normative performance ranking, may monitor starting heart rate as an indicia of maximum acceptable weight, and may use a progressive or recursive set of subtests. The invention further includes methods for evaluating constant work capacity, and also includes devices and kits for practicing the claimed methods.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating lifting work capacity of a person, said method comprising the steps of:

(a) determining a maximum acceptable weight that said person can lift in a test comprising the steps of;

(1) selecting a starting weight a maximum allowable heart rate and a starting heart rate for said person;

(2) constantly monitoring a heart rate of said person during said test;

(3) requiring said person to lift a weight from a series of weights beginning with said starting weight;

(4) monitoring said heart rate of said person during lifting of said weight and if said heart rate exceeds said maximum allowable heart rate while said person is lifting said weight, stopping said test;

(5) monitoring said heart rate of said person after lifting said weight and if said heart rate does not return to said starting heart rate within a predetermined period of time in the range of 30 to 120 seconds after said person has lifted said weight, stopping said test; and

(6) if said test is not stopped repeating steps (3)-(5) until said test is stopped in steps (4) or (5) and, in step (3), requiring said person to lift a next weight in said series of weights where said next weight in said series of weights is heavier than the previous weight in said series of weights that was previously lifted by said person in step (3),

whereby said maximum acceptable weight is the heaviest weight of said series of weights that said person can lift before said heart rate of said person during lifting exceeds said maximum allowable heart rate or said heart rate of said person after lifting does not return to said predetermined starting heart rate within said predetermined period of time; and

(b) obtaining a normative performance ranking by locating said maximum acceptable weight on a table of normative data and locating a corresponding normative performance ranking,

whereby said lifting work capacity of said person is obtained.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of selecting a lifting limit.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein said maximum acceptable weight does not exceed said lifting limit.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein said lifting limit is the lesser of a target weight or a maximum lifting weight.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein said maximum lifting weight is based on said person'"'"'s height.

6. The method of claim 4 wherein said maximum lifting weight is gender-specific.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein said normative performance ranking is a percentile value based on maximum acceptable weight.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein said normative performance ranking is a percentile value based on the maximum acceptable weight and the body weight of said person.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of determining said person'"'"'s rating of a perceived load which is said person'"'"'s judgment as to the weight said person lifted.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein said step of determining said person'"'"'s rating of a perceived load is accomplished by said person selecting said perceived load from a list of standard perceptions.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of monitoring said person'"'"'s pain indicators.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of monitoring said person'"'"'s body mechanics.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein said person dies not know the quantity of weight to be lifted.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein said starting heart rate is calculated by subtracting the age of said person from 220 and then calculating 70% of that value.

15. The method of claim 1, further comprising a step of evaluating high risk work factors during said test to determine said maximum acceptable weight, said step comprising observing the posture of a person, while said person is performing a method for evaluating lifting work capacity of said person, by monitoring said person'"'"'s stance and any horizontal displacement between said person'"'"'s spine and a center of gravity of said weight being lifted by said person, determining if said person is exhibiting high risk work factors by comparing said person'"'"'s stance and said displacement to a table of normative data, and stopping said test if said person exhibits high risk work factors during two consecutive lifts of said weights.

16. A method for evaluating a vertical range lift capacity of a person, said method comprising:

(a) a first subtest in which a first maximum acceptable weight that said person can lift through a predetermined first vertical range is determined, comprising the steps of;

(1) selecting a starting weight, a maximum allowable heart rate and a starting heart rate for said person;

(2) constantly monitoring a heart rate of said person during said subtest;

(3) requiring said person to lift a weight from a series of weights beginning with said starting weight through a predetermined vertical range;

(4) monitoring said heart rate of said person during lifting of said weight and if said heart rate exceeds said maximum allowable heart rate while said person is lifting said weight, stopping said test;

(5) monitoring said heart rate of said person after lifting said weight and if said heart rate does not return to said starting heart rate within a predetermined period of time in the range of 30 to 120 seconds after said person has lifted said weight, stopping said test; and

(6) if said test is not stopped, repeating steps (3)-(5) until said test is stopped in steps (4) or (5) and, in step (3), requiring said person to lift a next weight is said series of weights where said next weight in said series of weights is heavier than the previous weight in said series of weights that was previously lifted by said person in step (3),

whereby said first maximum acceptable weight is the heaviest weight that said person can lift before said heart rate of said person during lifting exceeds said maximum allowable heart rate or said heart rate of said person after lifting does not return to said starting heart rate within said predetermined period of time;

(b) performing at least one subsequent progressive subtest; and

(c) for each subsequent subtest, determining a corresponding subsequent maximum acceptable weight that said person can lift through a predetermined subsequent vertical range wherein said subsequent vertical range is different for each subtest and said subsequent maximum acceptable weight for each subtest is the heaviest weight that said person can lift before said heart rate of said person during lifting exceeds said maximum allowable heart rate or said heart rate of said person after lifting does not return to said starting heart rate within said predetermined period of time;

whereby said vertical range lift capacity of said person is evaluated by comparing said subsequent maximum acceptable weights with said first maximum acceptable weight.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein said method is recursive.

18. The method of claim 16 wherein each of said subtests is selected from a sequential series of subtests comprising (a) one lift from knuckle to shoulder level, (b) one lift from floor to knuckle level, (c) one lift from floor to shoulder level, (d) four lifts from knuckle to shoulder level, (e) four lifts from floor to knuckle level, and (f) four lifts from floor to shoulder level.

19. The method of claim 18 wherein each of said subsequent progressive subtests is selected in order from said series.

20. The method of claim 18 wherein each progressive subtest having four repetitions has a preselected starting weight of approximately 40% of the maximum lifted weight of each corresponding one repetition subtest.

21. The method of claim 18 wherein the subtest having one repetition of lifting from floor to shoulder level has a preselected starting weight of approximately 70% of the lesser of the maximum lifted weight of the progressive subtest having one repetition of lifting from knuckle to shoulder level and the progressive subtest having one repetition of lifting from floor to knuckle level.

22. A method for evaluating the constant work capacity of a person, said method comprising the steps of:

(a) determining a maximal frequency for said person in a test comprising the steps of;

(1) selecting a weight and a maximum allowable heart rate,

(2) constantly monitoring a heart rate of said person during said test,

(3) requiring said person to repeatedly lift said weight through a predetermined vertical range at a maximal frequency for said person; and

(4) monitoring said heart rate of said person during lifting and if said heart rate exceeds said maximum allowable heart rate while said person is lifting said weight, stopping said test,

whereby said maximal frequency is the number of lifting cycles said person completes before said heart rate of said person exceeds said maximum allowable heart rate; and

(b) obtaining a performance ranking by locating said maximal frequency on a table of normative data and locating a corresponding performance ranking,

whereby said constant work capacity of said person is obtained.

23. The method of claim 22 wherein said performance ranking is a Method-Time-Measurement percentage.