Deployment control method for distributed architecture supplemental inflatable restraint system

• US 5,899,949 A
• Filed: 01/26/1998
• Issued: 05/04/1999
• Est. Priority Date: 01/26/1998
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Delphi Technologies, Inc. (BorgWarner Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: Delco Electronics Corporation (Motors Liquidation Co. GUC Trust)
• Inventors: Kincaid, Kevin Dale
• Primary Examiner(s): MARQUIS, LISSI MOJICA
• Application Number:
  US09/012,974
• Time in Patent Office: 463 Days
• Field of Search: 701/45, 180/268, 280/734, 280/735
• US Class Current: 701/45
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 2021/01068 between different sensors and airbag control unit
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 2021/01075 between the airbag control unit and pyrotechnic fuses or equivalent actuators
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 2021/01115 specific data frames
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 21/01 Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents electrical circuits for transmission of signals between steering wheel and the vehicle itself B60R16/027; for electrically actuating belt retractor locking means B60R22/343
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 21/015 including means for detecting the presence or position of passengers, passenger seats or child seats , and the related safety parameters therefor, e.g. speed or timing of airbag inflation in relation to occupant position or seat belt use

Abstract

A deployment control method for distributed architecture SIR system provides improved fault tolerance and ensures that signals generated by various remote sensor modules are properly considered in determining whether to deploy restraint devices. The deployment control method establishes a succession of states, wherein entry into each state is conditioned upon the achievement of predetermined criteria, and deployment of a respective restraint device is conditioned upon the successive achievement of each state. The states include an inhibit state, an enabled state, an armed state and a deployment initiated state. The predetermined criteria include correct occupant position, collision verification or safing, and collision severity. Deployment can only be initiated when the initiator module has been advised that all three criteria have been met within a given time constraint.

Claims

1. In a vehicular supplemental restraint system including a plurality of sensors and deployment modules in distributed locations of the vehicle and inter-connected for communication over a common data bus, each of said deployment modules being coupled to a respective supplemental restraint device, a control method comprising the steps of:

activating a given deployment module to an enable state upon receipt of sensor module data over said data bus indicative of the presence of a vehicle occupant in position to benefit from deployment of the respective supplemental restraint device in a crash event;

activating said given deployment module to an armed state upon receipt of sensor module data over said data bus indicative of a crash event occurring while the enable state of said given deployment module is activated; and

deploying said respective supplemental restraint device upon receipt of a deployment command over said data bus while the armed state of said given deployment module is activated.

2. The control method set forth in claim 1, including the step of:

deactivating the armed state of said given deployment module a predetermined time after the activation of said armed state, the predetermined time being indicative of a maximum duration of a crash event.

3. The control method set forth in claim 1, including the step of:

initially activating said given deployment module to an inhibit state in which deployment of said respective supplemental restraint device is inhibited.

4. The control method set forth in claim 1, wherein said activating and deploying steps are carried out in each of said plurality of deployment modules.

5. The control method set forth in claim 1, including the step of:

deactivating said armed and enable states of said given deployment module upon receipt of sensor module data over said data bus indicative that said vehicle occupant is no longer in position to benefit from deployment of the respective supplemental restraint device in a crash event.

6. The control method set forth in claim 1, wherein said sensor module data indicative of a crash event is developed by a sensor module and communicated to said given deployment module over said data bus.

7. The control method set forth in claim 1, wherein said vehicular supplemental restraint system includes a central processor module connected to said common data bus, said sensor modules communicate with said central processor module over said data bus, and said central processor, in turn, communicates with said given deployment module over said data bus.

8. The control method set forth in claim 7, wherein said central processor communicates a signal indicative of the occurrence of a crash event to said given deployment module after receiving sensor data indicative of a crash event from at least two of said sensor modules.

9. In a vehicular supplemental restraint system including a plurality of sensors and deployment modules in distributed locations of the vehicle and inter-connected for communication over a common data bus, each of said deployment modules being coupled to a respective supplemental restraint device, a control method comprising the steps of:

defining in each deployment module a series of states leading up to deployment of a respective supplemental restraint device, said series of states being activated in succession in response to specified criteria communicated to respective deployment modules over said common data bus, said series of states including;

an enable state activated upon receipt of sensor module data over said data bus indicative of the presence of a vehicle occupant in position to benefit from deployment of the respective supplemental restraint device in a crash event;

an armed state activated following activation of said enable state, upon receipt of sensor module data over said data bus indicative of a crash event; and

a deployment initiated state activated following activation of said armed state, upon receipt of a deployment command over said data bus; and

deploying one or more supplemental restraint devices in response to the activation of said deployment initiated state in corresponding deployment modules.

10. The control method set forth in claim 9, including the step of:

deactivating the armed state of a given deployment module a predetermined time after the activation of said armed state, the predetermined time being indicative of a maximum duration of a crash event.

11. The control method set forth in claim 9, including the step of:

deactivating said armed and enable states of a given deployment module upon receipt of sensor module data over said common data bus indicative that said vehicle occupant is no longer in position to benefit from deployment of the respective supplemental restraint device in a crash event.

12. The control method set forth in claim 9, wherein said vehicular supplemental restraint system includes a central processor module connected to said common data bus, said sensor modules communicate with said central processor module over said data bus, and said central processor, in turn, communicates with said deployment modules over said common data bus.

13. The control method set forth in claim 12, wherein said central processor communicates a signal indicative of the occurrence of a crash event to one or more deployment modules after receiving sensor data indicative of a crash event from at least two of said sensor modules.