Network paging gateway

• US 5,907,550 A
• Filed: 09/09/1996
• Issued: 05/25/1999
• Est. Priority Date: 09/09/1996
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: TekNow, Inc.
• Original Assignee: TekNow, Inc.
• Inventors: Hontz, Steven M.
• Primary Examiner(s): Pham, Chi H.
• Assistant Examiner(s): NGUYEN, STEVEN H D
• Application Number:
  US08/709,619
• Time in Patent Office: 988 Days
• Field of Search: 370/389, 370/482, 370/392, 370/352, 370/355, 370/356, 370/465, 370/466, 370/467, 455/426, 455/445, 455/458, 455/456, 340/825.44
• US Class Current: 370/389
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 88/185 Selective call encoders for paging networks, e.g. paging centre devices

Abstract

In order to interface diverging paging networks, a gateway is established which includes a rules engine for applying rules to received packets. Each rule includes matching, modifying and routing elements for identifying and handling received paging packets. When a packet is received, it is first determined if the packet is matched to a first, matching element of one of a set of previously established rules. If, the packet is matched to the first element of a given rule, it is modified in accordance with the second element of the given rule and forwarded in accordance with the third element of the given rule. However, if the received packet is not matched to a matching element of any of the rules, a default rule is applied during the modification and forwarding procedures. User invokable procedures are provided by which rules can be modified or new rules can be added. Optionally, a first set of aspects of each received packet are monitored and stored in a database for billing and like historical purposes, and a second set of aspects are logged in real time to provide ongoing performance and activity evaluation.

Claims

1. A process for interfacing a plurality of diverse paging networks comprising the steps of:

A) establishing a set of rules, each rule including matching, modifying and routing elements, for identifying and handling received paging packets;

B) determining if a received paging packet is matched to a first, matching element of one of the set of previously established rules;

C) if, during step B), the received paging packet is matched to the first element of a given rule, modifying the received paging packet in accordance with the second element of the given rule;

D) forwarding the modified received paging packet in accordance with the third element of the given rule; and

E) monitoring and storing in a database a first set of predetermined aspects of each received packet.

2. The process of claim 1 in which, if during step B), the received packet is not matched to a first, matching element of any of the set of previously established rules, respectively applying second and third elements of a predetermined default rule during steps C) and D).

3. The process of claim 1 in which the set of rules is established in accordance with the Telocator Network Paging Protocol.

4. The process of claim 3 in which, if during step B), the received packet is not matched to a first, matching element of any of the set of previously established rules, respectively applying second and third elements of a predetermined default rule during steps C) and D).

5. The process of claim 1 in which, if during step B), the received packet is not matched to a first, matching element of any of the set of previously established rules, respectively applying second and third elements of a predetermined default rule during steps C) and D).

6. The process of claim 1 in which a second set of predetermined aspects of each received packet are logged in real time to provide performance and activity evaluation.

7. The process of claim 6 in which, if during step B), the received packet is not matched to a first, matching element of any of the set of previously established rules, respectively applying second and third elements of a predetermined default rule during steps C) and D).

8. The process of claim 1 which includes a user invokable step for adding new rules to the rule set after step A) has been completed.

9. The process of claim 1 which includes a user invokable step for modifying rules in the rule set after step A) has been completed.

10. The process of claim 3 which includes a user invokable step for modifying rules in the rule set after step A) has been completed.

11. The process of claim 4 which includes a user invokable step for modifying rules in the rule set after step A) has been completed.

12. The process of claim, 8 which includes a user invokable step for modifying rules in the rule set after step A) has been completed.

13. The process of claim 3 which includes a user invokable step for adding new rules to the rule set after step A) has been completed.

14. The process of claim 4 which includes a user invokable step for adding new rules to the rule set after step A) has been completed.

15. The process of claim 10 which includes a user invokable step for adding new rules to the rule set after step A) has been completed.

16. The process of claim 11 which includes a user invokable step for adding new rules to the rule set after step A) has been completed.

17. The process of claim 14 in which the set of rules is established in accordance with the Telocator Network Paging Protocol.

18. The process of claim 15 in which the set of rules is established in accordance with the Telocator Network Paging Protocol.

19. The process of claim 16 in which the set of rules is established in accordance with the Telocator Network Paging Protocol.