Process for ensuring a neutral vehicle handling during cornering and a simultaneous load change

• US 5,908,225 A
• Filed: 02/27/1997
• Issued: 06/01/1999
• Est. Priority Date: 02/27/1996
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
• Original Assignee: Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
• Inventors: Meier, Kurt
• Primary Examiner(s): Butler, Douglas C.
• Application Number:
  US08/807,747
• Time in Patent Office: 824 Days
• Field of Search: 303/DIG. 6, 303/146, 303/141, 303/147, 303/148, 303/140, 303/198, 303/190, 180/197, 180/245, 180/249, 180/250, 180/233, 180/247, 180/248, 701/70, 701/71, 701/72, 701/88, 701/82, 701/83, 701/78, 188/181 C, 188/181 A
• US Class Current: 303/146
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 8/1766 Proportioning of brake forces according to vehicle axle loads, e.g. front to rear of vehicle
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 303/06 Axle differential control

Abstract

A process for ensuring a neutral vehicle handling during cornering and a simultaneous load change is provided by the operation of a vehicle system having at least one driven axle, an axle differential gear, wheel brakes for the selective deceleration of an individual wheel, a device for recognizing a cornering and a device for recognizing a coasting operation and for generating a signal corresponding to the intensity of the coasting operation. The problem of rear-wheel driven and front-wheel driven vehicles is the vehicle handling during cornering in the coasting operation. As a result, depending on the method of operation, an oversteering or understeering of the vehicle is caused. The process avoids these problems in that, during a cornering, a wheel of the driven axle is decelerated at least as a function of the coasting operation signal such that the moment generated thereby, such as a counter-yawing moment, compensates the yawing moment caused by the cornering during the coasting operation.

Claims

1. A process for operating a vehicle system having at least one driven axle, an axle differential gear assigned to the one driven axle, wheel brakes for the selective deceleration of an individual wheel, a corner recognition device, and a coasting operation recognition device in order to ensure a neutral vehicle handling during cornering and a simultaneous load change, the process comprising the steps of:

recognizing vehicle cornering via the corner recognition device;

recognizing a coasting operation via the coasting operation recognition device;

generating a coasting operation signal corresponding to an intensity of the coasting operation recognized by the coasting operation recognition device;

braking a wheel of the driven axle during cornering at least as a function of the coasting operation signal in order to generate a counter-yawing moment; and

compensating a yawing moment caused by the cornering during the coasting operation via said counter-yawing moment generated by the braking of the wheel of the driven axle.

2. The process according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

for rear-wheel driven vehicles, braking a rear wheel which is located on an outside during cornering when there is a tendency to oversteer; and

braking the rear-wheel which is on an inside during cornering when there is a tendency to understeer.

3. The process according to claim 1, wherein for recognizing cornering, at least one of the following steps are performed:

determining a differential speed of the wheels on a nonpowered axle;

detecting a steering angle of the vehicle; and

detecting a lateral acceleration of the vehicle.

4. The process according to claim 2, wherein for recognizing cornering, at least one of the following steps are performed:

determining a differential speed of the wheels on a nonpowered axle;

detecting a steering angle of the vehicle; and

detecting a lateral acceleration of the vehicle.

5. The process according to claim 1, further comprising the step of drawing a conclusion as to an extent of the coasting operation by one of the following steps:

comparing a torque desired by a driver of the vehicle and a frictional moment of an engine of the vehicle; and

comparing a throttle valve setting of the driver and a characteristic zero moment curve in a characteristic engine moment diagram.

6. The process according to claim 2, further comprising the step of drawing a conclusion as to an extent of the coasting operation by one of the following steps:

comparing a torque desired by a driver of the vehicle and a frictional moment of an engine of the vehicle; and

comparing a throttle valve setting of the driver and a characteristic zero moment curve in a characteristic engine moment diagram.

7. The process according to claim 3, further comprising the step of drawing a conclusion as to an extent of the coasting operation by one of the following steps:

comparing a torque desired by a driver of the vehicle and a frictional moment of an engine of the vehicle; and

comparing a throttle valve setting of the driver and a characteristic zero moment curve in a characteristic engine moment diagram.

8. The process according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

determining a coefficient of friction of a road on which the vehicle is travelling; and

factoring into account the determined coefficient of friction in a calculation of a brake pressure to determine the counter-yawing moment in the case of the wheel to be braked.

9. The process according to claim 2, further comprising the steps of:

determining a coefficient of friction of a road on which the vehicle is travelling; and

factoring into account the determined coefficient of friction in a calculation of a brake pressure to determine the counter-yawing moment in the case of the wheel to be braked.

10. The process according to claim 3, further comprising the steps of:

determining a coefficient of friction of a road on which the vehicle is travelling; and

factoring into account the determined coefficient of friction in a calculation of a brake pressure to determine the counter-yawing moment in the case of the wheel to be braked.

11. The process according to claim 5, further comprising the steps of:

determining a coefficient of friction of a road on which the vehicle is travelling; and

factoring into account the determined coefficient of friction in a calculation of a brake pressure to determine the counter-yawing moment in the case of the wheel to be braked.

12. The process according to 8, wherein the coefficient of friction is determined from different wheel speeds and a vehicle acceleration.

13. The process according to claim 1, further comprising the step of factoring into account an engaged gear position of the vehicle during a determination of the brake pressure.

14. The process according to claim 1, wherein the braking step for generating the counter-yawing moment occurs when a specific vehicle operating condition exceeds a first control limit value.

15. The process according to claim 14, wherein the specific vehicle operating condition is one of a wheel speed difference and a slip of a driven wheel.

16. The process according to claim 14, wherein the first control limit value is determined as a function of a coefficient of friction of a road on which the vehicle is travelling.

17. The process according to claim 14, wherein the first control limit value is formed with a hysteresis, and the braking step starts when a first hysteresis curve is exceeded and is terminated when a falling below a second hysteresis curve occurs.

18. The process according to claim 16, wherein the first control limit value is formed with a hysteresis, and the braking step starts when a first hysteresis curve is exceeded and is terminated when a falling below a second hysteresis curve occurs.

19. The process according to claim 14, wherein the first control limit value is determined by a predetermined deviation of a speed of the wheel on the driven axle from an actual vehicle speed, or of a wheel slip of a driving wheel.

20. The process according to claim 17, wherein the first and second hysteresis curve of the first control limit value are determined by a predetermined deviation of a speed of the wheel on the driven axle from an actual vehicle speed, or of a wheel slip of a driving wheel.

21. The process according to claim 1, wherein the braking step for generating the counter-yawing moment is terminated when a road grip of the wheel taking over a lateral control is about to cease.

22. The process according to claim 21, wherein the braking step is terminated when, in the case of rear-wheel driven vehicles, a deviation of the wheel speed of the rear wheel which is on the outside during the cornering from an actual vehicle speed or a wheel slip exceeds a second control limit value.

23. The process according to claim 22, wherein a first control limit value regulating when the braking step takes place or first and second hysteresis curves of said first control limit value are determined by an offset of the second control limit value.

24. The process according to claim 22, wherein the braking step is terminated when the second control limit value has been exceeded for a specific time period.

25. The process according to claim 23, wherein the braking step is terminated when the second control limit value has been exceeded for a specific time period.

26. The process according to claim 24, wherein the specific time period is determined as a function of a road friction.

27. The process according to claim 1, further comprising the step of compensating a negative acceleration additionally caused by the braking step which generates the counter-yawing moment by increasing an engine torque.

28. The process according to claim 27, wherein the increase of the engine torque is determined while factoring into account a braking pressure for the braking step generating the counter-yawing moment and vehicle-specific data.

29. The process according to claim 1, wherein a wheel cylinder braking pressure for the braking step which determines the counter-yawing moment is determined via an addition of pressure buildup pulses and a subtraction of pressure reduction pulses pursuant to a known P-V diagram.

30. The process according to claim 1, wherein the braking step for generating the counter-yawing moment is terminated when a braking operation is normal.

31. The process according to claim 1, wherein the braking step for generating the counter-yawing moment is terminated in an event of an antilock operation of the vehicle.

32. The process according to claim 1, wherein the braking step for generating the counter-yawing moment does not occur when the vehicle is below a predetermined absolute speed.

33. The process according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

for front-wheel driven vehicles, braking a front wheel which is on an inside during cornering when there is a tendency to understeer; and

braking the front wheel which is on the outside during cornering when there is a tendency to oversteer.

34. The process according to claim 33, wherein for recognizing cornering, at least one of the following steps are performed:

determining a differential speed of the wheels on a nonpowered axle;

detecting a steering angle of the vehicle; and

detecting a lateral acceleration of the vehicle.

35. The process according to claim 33, further comprising the step of drawing a conclusion as to an extent of the coasting operation by one of the following steps:

comparing a torque desired by a driver of the vehicle and a frictional moment of an engine of the vehicle; and

comparing a throttle valve setting of the driver and a characteristic zero moment curve in a characteristic engine moment diagram.

36. The process according to claim 33, further comprising the steps of:

determining a coefficient of friction of a road on which the vehicle is travelling; and

factoring into account the determined coefficient of friction in a calculation of a brake pressure to determine the counter-yawing moment in the case of the wheel to be braked.