Dynamic load weighing system

• US 5,917,159 A
• Filed: 06/06/1997
• Issued: 06/29/1999
• Est. Priority Date: 09/20/1996
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Mobile Advanced Scale Systems Corporation
• Original Assignee: Mobile Advanced Scale Systems Corporation
• Inventors: Kostiuk, Walter
• Primary Examiner(s): Gibson, Randy W.
• Application Number:
  US08/870,466
• Time in Patent Office: 753 Days
• Field of Search: 177/136, 177/137, 177/138, 177/139, 177/141, 177/211, 177/229, 177/147
• US Class Current: 177/136
• CPC Class Codes: B65F 2003/022 the discharging means comprising a device for determining the weight of the content of refuse receptacles
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 19/12 having electrical weight-sensitive devices
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 23/3728 with wireless means

Abstract

A method and device for determining the weight of a load while the load is being lifted by a lift or fork, typically in a lift-return cycle. Loadcell sensors are located close to the lift assembly with each loadcell sensor containing strain gauges attached to weigh posts to take measurements of forces acting in a multiple number of axes. The weight of the load can be calculated using these multi-axis measurements. The ratio of the forces acting in the different axes is used to correlate the measurements taken while the load is lifted and while the load is returned. The analog signals from the strain gauges are converted to digital signals by a analog-digital converter located in the loadcell sensor and transmitted to a computer which calculates the weight of the load with the use of a calibration table.

Claims

1. A method for determining a weight of a load using a lift assembly comprising a weight bearing portion, at least one loadcell sensor located on or adjacent to the weight bearing portion, wherein each loadcell sensor comprises at least one weigh post, and a plurality of strain gauges operatively connected to each weigh post to take measurements of forces acting on the weigh posts, the method comprising:

pro-calibrating the loadcell sensors of the lift assembly and generating a calibration table;

lifting the load with the lift assembly;

continuously taking strain gauge measurements of the forces acting on the weigh posts in at least two different axes while the load is being lifted;

taking multi-axis force measurements at at least one pre-determined position while the load is being lifted; and

calculating the weight of the load using the multi-axis force measurements and the calibration table,

wherein accurate weights of loads can be repeatedly determined without precalibrating the loadcell sensors and generating a new calibration table before each subsequent weight determination.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the multi-axis force measurements are taken at a plurality of pre-determined positions.

3. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the pre-calibration step includes compensating for errors caused by cross-talk prior to generating the calibration table.

4. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the multi-axis force measurements are taken at a plurality of pre-determined positions.

5. A method as claimed in claim 3 further comprising the steps of:

a) converting the strain gauge measurements and the multi-axis force measurements to digital signals; and

b) transmitting the digital signals to a processing unit where the weight of the load is calculated.

6. The method as claimed in claim 5, wherein the strain gauge measurements and the multi-axis force measurements are converted to the digital signals within the loadcell sensor.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

a) converting the strain gauge measurements and the multi-axis force measurements to digital signals; and

b) transmitting the digital signals to a processing unit where the weight of the load is calculated.

8. The method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the strain gauge measurements and the multi-axis force measurements are converted to the digital signals within the loadcell sensor.

9. A method for determining a weight of a container engaged by a lift assembly that travels through a lift-return cycle, wherein the lift assembly comprises a weight bearing portion, at least one loadcell sensor located on or adjacent to the weight bearing portion and comprising at least one weigh post, and a plurality of strain gauges operatively connected to each weigh post to take measurements of forces acting on the weigh posts, the method comprising:

pre-calibrating the loadcell sensors of the lift assembly and generating a calibration table;

causing the lift assembly to travel through the lift-return cycle which comprises lifting the container and returning the container;

continuously taking strain gauge measurements of the forces acting on the weigh posts in at least two different axes throughout the lift-return cycle;

taking multi-axis force measurements at at least one predetermined position while the container is lifted; and

calculating the weight of the material using the multi-axis force measurements and the calibration table,

wherein accurate weights of containers can be repeatedly determined without precalibrating the loadcell sensors and generating a new calibration table before each subsequent weight determination.

10. A method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the pre-calibration step includes compensating for errors caused by cross-talk prior to generating the calibration table.

11. The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein the second position is correlated to the first position by:

calculating a first ratio of the strain gauge measurements during lifting of the container and material;

calculating second ratios of the strain gauge measurements while returning the container; and

identifying when the second ratios are equal to the first ratio.

12. The method as claimed in claim 11 wherein the first and second ratios are calculated using ratios of the strain gauge measurements of the forces acting in a first axis to the strain gauge measurements of the forces acting in a second axis.

13. The method as claimed in claim 12 wherein the first and second multi-axis force measurements are taken at a plurality of first and second pre-determined positions, respectively.

16. The method as claimed in claim 13, wherein the first and second multi-axis force measurements are taken at a plurality of first and second predetermined positions, respectively.

23. The method as claimed in claim 16, further comprising the steps of converting the strain gauge measurements to digital signals and transmitting the digital signals to a processing unit where weights of the material and of the container are calculated.

24. The method as claimed in claim 23, wherein the second position is correlated to the first position by:

calculating a first ratio of the strain gauge measurements during lifting of the container and material;

calculating second ratios of the strain gauge measurements while returning the container; and

identifying when the second ratios equal the first ratio.

25. The method as claimed in claim 24, wherein the multi-axis force measurements are taken at a plurality of first and second pre-determined positions, respectively.

26. The method as claimed in claim 23, wherein the first and second ratios are calculated using ratios of the strain gauge measurements of the forces acting, in a first axis to the strain gauge measurements acting in a second axis.

27. The method as claimed in claim 26, wherein the multi-axis force measurements are taken at a plurality of pre-determined positions.

28. The method as claimed in claim 23, further comprising the steps of converting the strain gauge measurements to digital signals and transmitting the digital signals to a processing unit where weights of the material and of the container are calculated.

29. The method as claimed in claim 28, wherein the first and second multi-axis force measurements are taken at a plurality of first and second predetermined positions, respectively.

30. The method as claimed in claim 16, wherein the multi-axis force measurements are taken at a plurality of pre-determined positions.

31. The method as claimed in claim 30 further comprising the steps of:

converting the strain gauge measurements and the multi-axis force measurements to digital signals; and

transmitting the digital signals to a processing unit where the weight of the load is then calculated.

32. The method as claimed in claim 31 wherein the strain gauge measurements and the multi-axis force measurements are converted to digital signals within the loadcell sensor.

14. A method for determining a weight of a container engaged by a lift assembly that travels through a lift-return cycle and of material in the container, wherein the lift assembly comprises a load bearing portion, at least one loadcell sensor located on or adjacent to the weight bearing portion, each loadcell sensor having at least one weigh post, and a plurality of strain gauges operatively connected to each weigh post to take measurements of forces acting on the weigh posts, the method comprising:

pre-calibrating the loadcell sensors of the lift assembly and generating a calibration table;

causing the lift assembly to travel through the lift-return cycle which comprises lifting the container, emptying the material from the container and returning the container;

continuously taking strain gauge measurements of the forces acting on the weigh posts in at least two different axes throughout the lift-return cycle;

taking first multi-axis force measurements of at least one predetermined first position while the container and material are lifted;

taking second multi-axis force measurements at at least one predetermined second position while returning the container, wherein the second position correlates to the first position; and

calculating the weight of the material and of the container using the first and second multi-axis force measurements and the calibration table,

wherein accurate weights of material and containers can be repeatedly determined without pre-calibrating the loadcell sensors and generating a new calibration table before each subsequent weight determination.

15. A method as claimed in claim 14, wherein the pre-calibration step includes compensating for errors caused by cross-talk prior to generating the calibration table.

17. The method as claimed in claim 15, further comprising the steps of converting the strain gauge measurements to digital signals and transmitting the digital signals to a processing unit where weights of the material and of the container are calculated.

18. The method as claimed in claim 17, wherein the strain gauge measurements and multi-axis measurements are converted to digital signals within the loadcell.

19. The method as claimed in claim 17, wherein the second position is correlated to the first position by:

calculating a first ratio of the strain gauge measurements during lifting of the container and material;

calculating second ratios of the strain gauge measurements while returning the container; and

identifying when the second ratios equal the first ratio.

20. The method as claimed in claim 19, wherein the first and second ratios are calculated using ratios of the strain gauge measurements of the forces acting, in a first axis to the strain gauge measurements acting in a second axis.

21. The method as claimed in claim 20, wherein the first and second multi-axis force measurements are taken at a plurality of first and second predetermined positions, respectively.

22. The method as claimed in claim 18, further comprising the steps of converting the strain gauge measurements to digital signals and transmitting the digital signals to a processing unit where weights of the material and of the container are calculated.

33. An apparatus for weighing a load being lifted by a lifting assembly having a weight bearing portion comprising:

at least one loadcell sensor positioned on or adjacent to the weight bearing portion of the lifting assembly wherein each loadcell sensor comprises at least one weigh post;

a plurality of strain gauges operatively connected to each weigh post to take measurements of forces acting on the weigh post in at least two different axes; and

calculating means for calculating the weight of the load using the strain gauge measurements of the forces and for pre-calibrating the loadcell sensors to generate a calibration table,

wherein accurate weights of loads can be repeatedly determined without precalibrating the loadcell sensors and generating a new calibration table before each subsequent weight determination.

34. An apparatus as claimed in claim 33 wherein the calculating means is a processing unit and further comprising at least one analog to digital converter located within the loadcell and means for transmitting the digital signals to the processing unit.

35. The apparatus as claimed in claim 34 wherein the transmitting means is a wireless transmitter.

36. The apparatus as claimed in claim 35 wherein the processing unit is located proximate the at least one analog to digital converter, the apparatus further comprising second processing means for transmitting information about the weight of the load from the processing unit to a second processing unit.

37. The apparatus as claimed in claim 36 wherein the means for calculating the weight is a processing unit.

38. The apparatus as claimed in claim 37 wherein the processing unit is located proximate the at least one analog to digital converter, the apparatus further comprising second means for transmitting information about the weight of the load from the processing unit to a second processing unit.

39. The apparatus as claimed in claim 38, wherein the second transmitting means is a wireless transmitter.