Buffer reservoir for a liquid-ink writing instrument, and a writing instrument including such a reservoir

• US 5,927,885 A
• Filed: 04/14/1997
• Issued: 07/27/1999
• Est. Priority Date: 04/23/1996
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Conte
• Original Assignee: Debiotech S.A.
• Inventors: Duez, Jose, Bedhome, Vincent
• Primary Examiner(s): Bratlie, Steven A.
• Application Number:
  US08/834,172
• Time in Patent Office: 834 Days
• Field of Search: 401/198, 401/199
• US Class Current: 401/199
• CPC Class Codes: B43K 8/04 Arrangements for feeding ink to writing-points
• CPC Class Codes: B43K 8/06 Wick feed from within reservoir to writing-points

Abstract

A buffer reservoir suitable for absorbing surplus ink and a writing instrument including the buffer reservoir are provided. The buffer reservoir includes a mixture of microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to the ink and microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to the ink. The mixture of microbeads may either be uniform throughout the entire volume of the buffer reservoir, or non-uniform throughout the entire volume of the buffer reservoir, with the proportion of hydrophilic microbeads to hydrophobic microbeads being smaller in the zone immediately in contact with the feed tip and larger in the zone farthest away from the feed tip. Preferably, the proportion of hydrophilic microbeads is in the range of about 2% to about 10%, by weight, relative to the total weight of the buffer reservoir. The writing instrument includes a reservoir for liquid ink, a feed tip opening out into the reservoir, and a buffer reservoir.

Claims

1. A buffer reservoir for a writing instrument containing a liquid ink, comprising:

the form of a compact block made of an open-pore material based on microbeads, wherein a first portion of said microbeads is hydrophobic relative to said ink and a second portion of said microbeads is hydrophilic relative to said ink.

2. A buffer reservoir according to claim 1, wherein said microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink and said microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink are distributed in a uniform mixture throughout the entire volume of said buffer reservoir.

3. A buffer reservoir according to claim 1, wherein said microbeads are distributed in a non-uniform mixture, such that said portion of microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink is relatively smaller than the portion of microbeads that are hydrophobic to said ink in a zone immediately in contact with a feed tip, and is larger in a zone that is furthest away therefrom.

4. A buffer reservoir according to claim 3, further comprising annular elements nesting in one another, wherein said portion of microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink is smallest in an annular element that is immediately in contact with said feed tip, and is largest in another annular element that is furthest away therefrom.

5. A buffer reservoir according to claim 1, wherein said portion of microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink lies in a range of about 2% to about 10% relative to the total weight of said buffer reservoir.

6. A buffer reservoir according to claim 2, wherein about 95% of the uniform mixture comprises microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink, and about 5% of said uniform mixture comprises microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink.

7. A buffer reservoir according to claim 1, wherein said microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink comprise a different material than said microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink.

8. A buffer reservoir according to claim 1, wherein said microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink comprise different dimensions than said microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink.

9. A buffer reservoir according to claim 1, wherein said microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink comprise a different melting point than said microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink.

10. A buffer reservoir according to claim 1 wherein said microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink comprise a different material and different dimensions than said microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink.

11. A buffer reservoir according to claim 1, wherein said microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink comprise a different material and a different melting point than said microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink.

12. A buffer reservoir according to claim 1, wherein said microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink comprise different dimensions and a different melting point than said microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink.

13. A writing instrument comprising:

a buffer reservoir;

a reservoir for a liquid ink; and

a feed tip opening out into the reservoir;

wherein said buffer reservoir is constructed and arranged to absorb surplus ink from said ink reservoir and to return surplus ink to said ink reservoir, said buffer reservoir comprising microbeads, wherein a portion of said microbeads are hydrophobic relative to said liquid ink and another portion of said microbeads are hydrophilic relative to said liquid ink, said buffer reservoir fitting snugly around said feed tip and being coaxial therewith.

14. The writing instrument of claim 13, wherein said microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink and said microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink are distributed in a uniform mixture throughout the entire volume of said buffer reservoir.

15. The writing instrument of claim 13, wherein said microbeads are distributed in a non-uniform mixture throughout the entire volume of said buffer reservoir, such that said portion of microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink is smaller in a zone immediately in contact with said feed tip, and is larger in a zone that is furthest away therefrom.

16. The writing instrument of claim 13, further comprising annular elements nesting in one another, wherein said portion of microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink is smallest in an annular element that is immediately in contact with said feed tip, and is largest in another annular element that is furthest away therefrom.

17. The writing instrument of claim 13, wherein said portion of microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink lies in the range of about 2% to about 10% relative to the total weight of said buffer reservoir.

18. The writing instrument of claim 13, wherein about 95% of the mixture comprises microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink, and about 5% of said mixture comprises microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink.

19. The writing instrument of claim 13, wherein said microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink comprise different dimensions than said microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink.

20. The writing instrument of claim 13, wherein said microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink comprise a different melting point than said microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink.

21. The writing instrument of claim 13, wherein said microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink comprise a different material and different dimensions than said microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink.

22. The writing instrument of claim 13, wherein said microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink comprise a different material and a different melting point than said microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink.

23. The writing instrument of claim 13, wherein said microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink comprise a different dimension and a different melting point than said microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink.

24. The writing instrument of claim 13, wherein said microbeads that are hydrophilic relative to said ink comprise a different material and different dimensions than said microbeads that are hydrophobic relative to said ink.