Monitoring and directing flow of HTML documents for security and access

• US 5,930,792 A
• Filed: 11/07/1996
• Issued: 07/27/1999
• Est. Priority Date: 11/07/1996
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Intervoice Limited Partnership
• Original Assignee: Intervoice Limited Partnership
• Inventors: Polcyn, Michael J.
• Primary Examiner(s): Kulik, Paul V.
• Assistant Examiner(s): ROBINSON, GRETA LEE
• Application Number:
  US08/747,013
• Time in Patent Office: 992 Days
• Field of Search: 707/500, 707/513, 707/514, 707/516, 707/907, 707/9, 707/10, 707/100, 707/102, 707/1
• US Class Current: 715/234
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/748 Hypervideo linking data to content, e.g. by linking an URL to a video object in the context of video distribution systems H04N21/858
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99939 Privileged access
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99943 Generating database or data structure, e.g. via user interface

Abstract

A computer server that stores a HTML document, receives a request via a global network from a user for the document and sends the document to the user. The computer server uses a state machine to examine the request to determine a current state status of the request and compares it to the required state status for accessing the document stored in a state transition model. If the current status fulfills the required status, then access to the document is granted. If the required status is not fulfilled, then the server sends an error message to the user denying access to the document. Thus, the server imposes a structured, hierarchical format onto a freeform hypertext links of HTML documents by restricting movement between the links to legal transitions.

Claims

1. A system for enforcing a hierarchical menu structure for a document of a plurality of documents present on a server, the system comprising:

means for receiving a request for access to a document from a user;

means for examining at least one factor for granting authorization to the user to access the document, wherein another document has been most recently accessed by said user;

means for establishing the another document as a factor of said at least one factor in the step of examining; and

means for prohibiting access to the document except when said authorization is granted.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the server is a global network server.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the server is a local network server.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the system is a stand-alone unit.

5. The system of claim 1, further comprising:

means for generating a signal informing the user of denial of the request upon determination that authorization is not granted.

6. The system of claim 5, further comprising:

means for delivering the signal to the user.

7. The system of claim 5, wherein the signal is an error message.

8. The system of claim 1, further comprising:

means for generating a signal informing the user of denial of the request upon determination that the document could not be located.

9. The system of claim 1, further comprising:

means for storing the document; and

means for retrieving and delivering the document to the user after access has been granted.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein:

the user requests the document from a computer operating a HTML browser.

11. The system of claim 1, wherein:

the document is written in a language from the group consisting of;

HTML, VRTL and JAVA.

12. The system of claim 1, further comprising:

means for storing at least one authorization model for a plurality of users, wherein said at least one authorization model determines whether the document can be accessed; and

means for associating each authorization model with a particular user of said plurality of users.

13. The device of claim 1, further comprising:

means for storing a plurality of authorization models for a plurality of users, wherein each authorization model corresponds to at least one user of said plurality of users; and

means for associating each authorization model to a particular user of said plurality of users.

14. The system of claim 1, wherein:

the means for receiving is a telephone network.

15. The system of claim 1, wherein:

the means for receiving is a data network.

16. The system of claim 1, wherein:

the document references another document.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein:

said another document is stored on the server.

18. The system of claim 16, wherein:

said another document is stored on another server located remote from the server.

33. The system of claim 1, wherein the user has an identity and the identity of the user is a factor of said at least one factor.

34. The system of claim 1, wherein the user has a document access history and said document access history is a factor of said at least one factor.

35. The system of claim 1, wherein the means for prohibiting comprises means for ensuring restricted access to documents for security purposes.

36. The system of claim 1, wherein the means for prohibiting comprises means for enforcing a logical sequence of access to said plurality of documents.

19. A method for enforcing a hierarchical menu structure for a document of a plurality of documents present on a server, the method comprising the steps of:

receiving a request for access to a document from a user;

examining at least one factor for granting authorization to the user to access the document, wherein another document has been most recently accessed by said user;

establishing the another document as a factor of said at least one factor in the step of examining; and

prohibiting access to the document except when said authorization is granted.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the server is a global network server.

21. The method of claim 19, wherein the server is a local network server.

22. The method of claim 19, wherein the user has an identity and the identity of the user is a factor of said at least one factor.

23. The method of claim 19, wherein the user has a document access history and said document access history is a factor of said at least one factor.

24. The method of claim 19, wherein the step of prohibiting ensures restricted access to documents for security purposes.

25. The method of claim 19, wherein the step of prohibiting enforces a logical sequence of access to said plurality of documents.

32. The method of claim 19, wherein the document is written in a language selected from the group consisting of:

HTML, VRTL, and JAVA.

26. The method of step 19, further comprising the steps of:

denying access to the document; and

sending the user an error message when authorization is not granted.

27. The method of step 19, wherein said request to access the document is effected through use of a hypertext link.

28. The method of step 19, wherein said request to access the document is effected through the use of a freeform link.

29. The method of Step 19, wherein said request to access the document is effected through the use of a form of random access link.

30. The method of step 19, wherein means for authentication is a factor of said at least one factor.

31. The method of step 30, wherein the means for authentication comprises a password.

37. The system of step 1, further comprising:

means for denying access to the document; and

means for sending the user an error message when authorization is not granted.

38. The system of step 1, wherein said request to access the document is effected through use of a hypertext link.

39. The system of step 1, wherein said request to access the document is effected through the use of a freeform link.

40. The system of step 1, wherein said request to access the document is effected through the use of a form of random access link.

41. The system of step 1, wherein means for authentication is a factor of said at least one factor.

42. The system of step 41, wherein the means for authentication comprises a password.

43. A method for enforcing a hierarchical menu structure for a world wide web site having a plurality of web pages, the method comprising the steps of:

receiving a request for access to a web page from a user;

examining at least one factor for granting authorization to the user for accessing the web page, wherein the user is currently at another web page;

establishing the web page address of the another page as a factor of said at least one factor; and

prohibiting access to the web page except when said authorization is granted.