Xerographic xerciser including a hierarchy system for determining part replacement and failure

• US 5,946,521 A
• Filed: 03/05/1998
• Issued: 08/31/1999
• Est. Priority Date: 03/05/1998
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Xerox Corporation (Xerox Holdings Corp.)
• Original Assignee: Xerox Corporation (Xerox Holdings Corp.)
• Inventors: Budnik, Roger W., Shoemaker, Ralph A., Raj, Guru B., Pacer, James M., Swales, Michael G.
• Primary Examiner(s): LEE, SUSAN SHUK YIN
• Application Number:
  US09/035,080
• Time in Patent Office: 544 Days
• Field of Search: 399/9, 399/24, 399/26, 399/29, 399/30, 399/32, 399/31, 399/34
• US Class Current: 399/24
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 15/5033 by measuring the photoconductor characteristics, e.g. temperature, or the characteristics of an image on the photoconductor
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 15/5041 Detecting a toner image, e.g. density, toner coverage, using a test patch G03G15/553 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 15/5079 for maintenance
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 15/55 Self-diagnostics; Malfunction or lifetime display
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 2215/00042 Optical detection

Abstract

A method to provide a highly intelligent, automated diagnostic system that identifies the need to replace specific parts to minimize machine downtime rather than require extensive service troubleshooting. In particular, a systematic, logical test analysis scheme to assess machine operation from a simple sensor system and to be able to pinpoint parts and components needing replacement is provided by a series of first level of tests by the control to monitor components for receiving a first level of data and by a series of second level of tests by the control to monitor components for receiving a second level of data. Each of the first level tests and first level data is capable of identifying a first level of part failure independent of any other test. Each of the second level tests and second level data is a combination of first level tests and first level data or a combination of a first level test and first level data and a second level test and second level data. The second level tests and second level data are capable of identifying second and third levels of part failure. Codes are stored and displayed to manifest specific part failures.

Claims

1. In an image processing machine having a photoreceptor surface and xerographic process modules including charging, exposure, development, and cleaner subsystems, a control with multiple levels of diagnostic analysis, and a sensor system to monitor developed test patches, a method to identify part failure within the machine comprising the steps of:

providing a calibration count of the sensor system to determine an unacceptable degree of machine contamination,

determining a existence of any defective areas of the photoreceptor surface,

deciding effectiveness of the cleaner subsystem to purge the photoreceptor surface of unwanted toner,

determining non-uniform areas of development on the photoreceptor surface, and

sequentially pinpointing part failures in the charging, development, and exposure subsystems.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the exposure subsystem is a raster output scanner providing image pixels and includes the step of determining deterioration of the energy distribution of the image pixels.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the raster output scanner includes a dual beam laser and including the step of determining operability of each of the laser beams.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of providing a calibration count of the sensor system to determine an unacceptable degree of machine contamination includes the steps of sensing a bare photoreceptor surface in a series of steps for calibrating the sensor system to a nominal voltage response,

periodically sensing a bare photoreceptor surface in a series of steps to re-calibrate the sensor system to the nominal voltage response,

determining a contamination level based upon the difference in calibration steps from the initial sensing of the bare photoreceptor surface, and

recording a contamination level in response to the difference in calibration steps from the initial sensing of the bare photoreceptor.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of determining the existence of any defective areas of the photoreceptor surface includes the steps of monitoring the reflectance of a bare photoreceptor surface in a series of readings over the complete surface, calculating an overall clean belt uniformity measurement, determining the mean and variance of each process control test patch from a belt uniformity measurement, finding a uniformity factor for each process control test patch, and determining a uniformity level for the photoreceptor surface.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of deciding the effectiveness of the cleaner subsystem to purge the photoreceptor surface of unwanted toner includes the steps of sensing a bare photoreceptor surface in specific segments of selected zones of the photoreceptor surface for calibrating the sensor system to a clean surface response, recording values for signals sensed for each segment of each zone, providing and developing given halftone toner images on each of the specific segments of each selected zone, cleaning the toner from each of the specific segments of each selected zone, again sensing the bare photoreceptor surface in the specific segments of the selected zones of the photoreceptor surface, and comparing the sensed segments of the photoreceptor surface before and after cleaning to determine operability of the cleaner subsystem.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of determining non-uniform areas of development on the photoreceptor surface includes the steps of providing a series of halftone test patches over a circumference of the photoreceptor surface, sensing a reflectance of signals from each of the halftone test patches over the circumference of the photoreceptor surface, analyzing the signals reflected from each of the halftone test patches by comparing to the signals to reference signals, the reference signals providing a standard for uniformity, and identifying segments of the photoreceptor surface manifesting non-uniformity.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of sequentially pinpointing part failures in the charging, development, and exposure subsystems includes the steps of developing multiple test patches with nominal settings for the charge, exposure, and development subsystems, each of the test patches having a nominal reflectance range, measuring a reflectance level of each of the test patches, determining a charging malfunction if the reflectance level of each of the patches is outside the nominal reflectance range, creating a first additional test patch by turning off the charge and exposure subsystems and enabling the development subsystem if the reflectance level of each of the patches is within the nominal reflectance range, measuring the reflectance level of the first additional test patch to determine a status of the development subsystem, creating a second additional test patch using nominal charge and nominal development settings and a relatively high exposure setting, measuring the reflectance level of the second additional test patch and determining a status of the exposure subsystem.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the sensor system includes a toner area coverage sensor.

10. The method of claim 8 wherein the step of determining the status of the development subsystem includes the step of isolating development subsystem malfunctions from a reflectance level that is dark, dark to light, and light.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein a dark reflectance level indicates a development subsystem malfunction or low toner concentration.

12. The method of claim 10 wherein a dark to light reflectance level indicates one of a donor roll malfunction, a background fault and an intermittent ground.

13. The method of claim 10 wherein a light reflectance level indicates one of a power supply malfunction, a developer drive problem, and a bad ground connection.

14. The method of claim 8 wherein the step of determining the status of the exposure subsystem includes the step of isolating exposure subsystem malfunctions according to one of a reflectance level that is dark, dark to light, and light.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein a dark reflectance level indicates a video cabling malfunction.

16. The method of claim 14 wherein a dark to light reflectance level indicates a bad ground connection.

17. The method of claim 14 wherein a light reflectance level indicates a video path malfunction.

18. The method of claim 1 wherein the image processing machine includes a toner dispense subsystem and including the step of determining an operational status of the toner dispense subsystem.

19. The method of claim 18 wherein the step of determining the operational status of the toner dispense subsystem includes the steps of providing and developing a first special test patch on the photoreceptor surface, the first special test patch providing a first developed patch signal, dispensing toner to a developer for a given period of time at a given rate, providing and developing a second special test patch on the photoreceptor surface, the second special test patch providing a second developed patch signal, comparing the first developed patch signal to the second developed patch signal, and depending upon the difference in signals indicating the difference in development of the test patches, determining a deterioration of the toner dispense subsystem.

20. In an image processing machine including a control with multiple levels of diagnostic analysis and a sensor system to monitor developed test patches, a method to identify part failure within the machine comprising the steps of:

providing a series of first level of tests by the control to monitor components for receiving a first level of data, each of the first level tests and first level data for identifying a first level of part failure independent of any other test,

providing a series of second level of tests by the control to monitor components for receiving a second level of data, each of the second level tests and second level data being a combination of first level tests and first level data or a combination of a first level test and first level data and a second level test and second level data, the second level tests and second level data for identifying second and third levels of part failure,

providing an additional analysis of first, second, and third level data obtained from the first level, second level, and third level tests for identifying a fourth level of part failure, and

storing and displaying codes manifesting the specific part failures.

21. The method of claim 20 wherein the sensor system includes a toner area coverage sensor and the first and second level of tests include the steps of reading various halftone and solid area patches.

22. The method of claim 20 wherein the step of providing an additional analysis includes the step of projecting trends of part wear.

23. The method of claim 20 wherein the step of storing and displaying codes manifesting the specific part failures includes the step of indicating multiple parts and subsystems needing replacement.

24. The method of claim 20 including the step of machine communication over a network with a remote host and the step of directing the machine to run diagnostic self analysis from the remote host.

25. In an image processing machine having a photoreceptor surface and xerographic process modules including charging, exposure, development, and cleaner subsystems, a control and a sensor system to monitor developed test patches, a method to identify part failure within the machine comprising the steps of:

determining existence of any defective areas of the photoreceptor surface for development,

deciding an effectiveness of the cleaner subsystem to purge the photoreceptor surface of unwanted toner, and

sequentially pinpointing part failures in the charging, development, and exposure subsystems.

26. The method of claim 25 wherein the step of sequentially pinpointing part failures in the charging, development, and exposure subsystems includes the steps of

developing multiple test patches with nominal settings for the charge, exposure, and development subsystems

measuring a reflectance level of each of the test patches,

determining a charging malfunction if a reflectance level of each of the patches is outside a nominal reflectance range,

creating a first additional test patch to determine the status of the development subsystem, and

creating a second additional test patch to determine the status of the exposure subsystem.

27. The method of claim 25 wherein the exposure subsystem is a raster output scanner providing image pixels and includes the step of determining deterioration of energy distribution of the image pixels.

28. The method of claim 25 wherein the exposure subsystem includes a dual beam laser and including the step of determining operability of each of the laser beams.

29. The method of claim 25 including the step of providing a calibration count of the sensor system to determine an unacceptable degree of machine contamination.

30. The method of claim 25 including step of determining the existence of any defective areas of the photoreceptor surface.

31. The method of claim 25 including the step of deciding effectiveness of the cleaner subsystem to purge the photoreceptor surface of unwanted toner.

32. The method of claim 25 including the step of determining non-uniform areas of development on the photoreceptor surface.