Method and apparatus for predicting a fault condition

• US 5,950,147 A
• Filed: 06/05/1997
• Issued: 09/07/1999
• Est. Priority Date: 06/05/1997
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Caterpillar Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Caterpillar Incorporated
• Inventors: Schricker, David R., Sarangapani, Jagannathan
• Primary Examiner(s): ASSOUAD, PATRICK J
• Application Number:
  US08/870,113
• Time in Patent Office: 824 Days
• Field of Search: 364/551.02, 364/551.01, 364/550, 364/554, 364/570, 364/577, 340/870.01, 340/901, 340/425.5, 340/500, 340/514, 340/517, 340/526, 701/1, 701/29, 702/176, 702/177, 702/179, 702/182, 702/181, 702/183, 702/184, 702/185, 702/187, 702/189
• US Class Current: 702/179
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 23/0232 based on qualitative trend analysis, e.g. system evolution

Abstract

An apparatus for predicting a fault condition for a machine is disclosed. The machine has a plurality of parameters being dependent upon machine performance. A sensor connected to the machine produces an electrical signal in response to one of the plurality of machine parameters. A computer produces a data trend of the parameter in response to the electrical signal, calculates the duration and slope of the trend, and predicts the time period in which the trend will exceed the warning level.

Claims

1. An apparatus for predicting a fault condition, comprising:

a machine having a plurality of parameters being dependent upon machine performance;

a sensor connected to the machine and adapted to produce an electrical signal in response to one of the plurality of machine parameters;

means for producing a data trend of the parameter in response to the electrical signal;

means for calculating the duration and slope of the trend;

means for calculating the distance from the last data point of the trend to a warning level;

means for determining a severity index; and

means for predicting the time period in which the trend will exceed the warning level in response to the duration, slope, and distance, and modifying the use of the machine as a function of the severity index and the predicted time period.

2. An apparatus, as set forth in claim 1, including means for normalizing the trend, duration and distance magnitudes.

3. An apparatus, as set forth in claim 2, including means for selecting a confidence factor for each of the normalized slope, duration and distance magnitudes.

4. An apparatus, as set forth in claim 3, including means for storing a plurality of normalized trend, duration and distance magnitudes that correspond to a plurality of associated confidence factors, comparing the actual normalized magnitude to the stored normalized magnitudes, and selecting a corresponding confidence factor for each of the normalized slope, duration and distance magnitudes.

5. An apparatus, as set forth in claim 4, including means for combining the slope, duration, and distance confidence factors to obtain a significance factor.

6. An apparatus, as set forth in claim 5, including means for trending the significance factor against the severity index.

7. An apparatus, as set forth in claim 6, including means for comparing the severity index with a caution threshold and projecting the data trend in response to the severity index exceeding the caution threshold.

8. An apparatus, as set forth in claim 7, including means for projecting the data trend by extending the data trend to the warning level based on the slope of the data trend.

9. A method for predicting a fault condition for a machine having a plurality of parameters being dependent upon machine performance, the method including the following steps:

producing an electrical signal in response to one of the plurality of machine parameters;

producing a data trend of the parameter in response to the electrical signal;

calculating the duration and slope of the trend;

calculating the distance from the last data point of the trend to a warning level;

determining a severity index;

predicting the time period in which the trend will exceed the warning level in response to the duration, slope, and distance; and

modifying the use of the machine as a function of the severity index and the predicted time period.

10. A method, as set forth in claim 9, including the steps of normalizing the trend, duration and distance magnitudes.

11. A method, as set forth in claim 10, including the steps of selecting a confidence factor for each of the normalized slope, duration and distance magnitudes.

12. A method, as set forth in claim 11, including the steps of storing a plurality of normalized trend, duration and distance magnitudes that correspond to a plurality of associated confidence factors, comparing the actual normalized magnitude to the stored normalized magnitudes, and selecting a corresponding confidence factor for each of the normalized slope, duration and distance magnitudes.

13. A method, as set forth in claim 12, including the step of combining the slope, duration, and distance confidence factors to obtain a significance factor.

14. A method, as set forth in claim 13, including the step of trending the significance factor against the severity index.

15. A method, as set forth in claim 14, the steps of comparing the severity index with a caution threshold and projecting the data trend in response to the severity index exceeding the caution threshold.

16. A method, as set forth in claim 15, including the step of projecting the data trend by extending the data trend to the warning level based on the slope of the data trend.