Method and apparatus for monitoring hydroelectric facility performance costs

• US 5,953,227 A
• Filed: 08/19/1996
• Issued: 09/14/1999
• Est. Priority Date: 08/19/1996
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Tennessee Valley Authority (Government of the United States of America)
• Original Assignee: Tennessee Valley Authority (Government of the United States of America)
• Inventors: Adkins, Frank, March, Patrick, Wolff, Paul J., Jones, R. Keith
• Primary Examiner(s): Elmore, Reba I.
• Assistant Examiner(s): PATEL, RAMESH B
• Application Number:
  US08/700,314
• Time in Patent Office: 1,121 Days
• Field of Search: 364/148-152, 364/153-158, 364/159, 364/164, 364/165, 364/492-495, 364/148.04, 364/148.06, 364/148.07
• US Class Current: 700/36
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 23/0294 Optimizing process, e.g. process efficiency, product quality

Abstract

A method and system are provided for monitoring performance parameters of a hydroelectric power generation facility and determining economic impact of operating the facility at levels other than predetermined reference levels. Optimal or desired levels of parameters of interest are stored in a memory circuit coupled to a central processing circuit. Actual values for the parameters of interest are sensed and communicated to the central processing circuit. Various monitoring circuit modules may be created for specific parameters of interest. The monitoring circuit modules compare the reference values to corresponding actual values and determine deviations from the desired parameter levels. A costing circuit applies an economic impact factor to the deviation values to determine the economic impact of the deviation. The technique may be used to evaluate past or present performance, predict future performance, schedule maintenance, predict payback for plant improvements and the like.

Claims

1. A method for monitoring performance of a hydroelectric power generation facility, the method comprising the steps of:

(a) storing in a memory circuit a predetermined reference signal for an operating parameter of the power generation facility, the predetermined reference signal representing a desired operating level for the parameter, the operating parameter being selected from a group comprising differential head from headwater to tailwater, power generation level, cavitation, and trash rack loss;

(b) sensing a current level of the operating parameter and generating a sensed parameter signal representative thereof;

(c) comparing the sensed parameter signal to the predetermined reference signal for the parameter to determine a parameter difference signal; and

(d) applying an economic cost factor to the parameter difference signal to generate an economic cost estimate value, the economic cost estimate value representing the economic cost of operation of the facility at the current level of the operating parameter compared to the desired operating level.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the predetermined reference signal represents an optimal operating level for the parameter.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the economic cost factor includes a unitized market value for energy produced by the facility.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the economic cost factor is accessed from an external data source through a communications link at the facility, the external cost factor tracking the actual value of energy produced by the facility.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the operating parameter is selected from a group comprising operating efficiently, cavitation and trash rack loss.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the economic cost factor is an average value for energy produced by the facility over a predetermined historical period.

7. The method of claim 1, comprising the further steps of storing the economic cost estimate value in a memory circuit, repeating steps (b)-(d) a plurality of times over a predetermined period to generate subsequent economic cost estimate values, storing the subsequent economic cost estimate values in the memory circuit, and generating a total cost value from the estimate values, the total cost value representing the economic cost of operating the facility at levels of the operating other than the desired operating level over the predetermined period.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the operating parameter is at least two operating parameters, the at least two operating parameters including flow through the facility and the operating parameter being selected from the group comprising differential head from headwater to tailwater, power generation level, cavitation, and trash rack loss.

9. A method for determining economic impact of operation of a hydroelectric power generation facility at conditions other than predetermined reference conditions comprising the steps of:

(a) storing in a memory circuit a reference value for an operating parameter of the facility, the reference value representing a reference operating level for the parameter, the operating parameter being selected from a group comprising differential head from headwater to tailwater, power generation level, cavitation, and trash rack loss;

(b) monitoring operation of the facility and generating an actual value for the operating parameter;

(c) comparing the reference value to the actual value to determine a difference value;

(d) deriving an economic impact value from the difference value by applying an economic impact factor thereto; and

(e) storing the economic impact value in the memory circuit.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the reference value represents an optimal or desired level of the operating parameter.

11. The method of claim 9, wherein the economic impact value represents a net cost of operating the facility at the actual value of the parameter.

12. The method of claim 9, wherein the economic impact value includes a unitized cost factor for energy produced by the facility.

13. The method of claim 9, comprising the further steps of repeating steps (b)-(e) a plurality of times over a predetermined period, storing subsequent economic impact values in the memory circuit, and generating a total economic impact value from the economic impact values, the total impact value representing the economic impact of operating the facility at levels of the operating other than the reference level.

14. The method of claim 9, wherein the operating parameter is at least two operating parameters, the at least two operating parameters including flow through the facility and the operating parameter being selected from the group comprising differential head from headwater to tailwater, power generation level, cavitation, and trash rack loss.

15. A system for determining economic impact of operation of a hydroelectric power generation facility at an operating level other than a predetermined reference operating level for an operating parameter, the facility including a dam extending across a stream and at least one turbine generator supported within the dam for generating electrical power from water flow from an upstream side to a downstream side of the dam, the system comprising:

a memory circuit, the memory circuit storing a reference parameter value representative of the reference operating level for the operating parameter, the operating parameter being selected from a group comprising differential head from the upstream side to the downstream side of the dam, power generation level, cavitation, and trash rack loss;

a sensor, the sensor being situated in the facility to detect actual levels of the operating parameter and to generate an actual parameter value representative thereof; and

a controller coupled to the memory circuit and to the sensor, the controller comparing the reference parameter value and the actual parameter value and applying an economic impact factor thereto to generate an economic impact value representative of the economic impact of operation of the facility at the actual level of the parameter rather than the reference level.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the controller includes a programmed computer.

17. The system of claim 15, wherein the economic impact factor is representative of the value of energy produced by the facility.

18. The system of claim 15, further comprising a plurality of sensors for detecting actual levels of a plurality of operating parameters, wherein the memory circuit stores reference parameter values for each of the plurality of operating parameters, and wherein the controller is coupled to the plurality of sensors, compares each of the actual levels to reference levels for respective parameters to determine respective difference values, and applies economic impact factors to each of the difference values to generate economic impact values for each of the plurality of operating parameters.

19. The system of claim 15, wherein the sensor includes at least two separate sensing devices, the controller being coupled to the sensing devices and deriving the actual parameter value from signals generated by the sensing devices.

20. The system of claim 15, further comprising an operator interface coupled to the controller, the controller displaying on the operator interface indicia representative of the economic impact value.