System and method for maintaining compatibility among network nodes connected to a computer network

• US 5,954,797 A
• Filed: 05/14/1997
• Issued: 09/21/1999
• Est. Priority Date: 05/14/1997
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Teradata US, Inc. (Teradata Corporation)
• Original Assignee: NCR Corporation
• Inventors: Sidey, Michael J.
• Primary Examiner(s): Ramirez, Ellis B.
• Application Number:
  US08/855,690
• Time in Patent Office: 860 Days
• Field of Search: 395/180, 395/181, 395/182.01, 395/182.07, 395/182.11, 395/183.01, 395/200.38, 395/200.5, 395/284, 395/651, 395/653, 395/712
• US Class Current: 709/223
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/00 Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks

Abstract

For use in a computer network having a plurality of nodes associated therewith, a network management system for maintaining compatibility among the plurality of nodes, comprising 1) polling circuit that retrieves node configuration information from the plurality of nodes, and 2) a comparison circuit that compares selected node configuration information associated with a first selected one of the plurality of nodes with known-good node configuration information to determine a level of compatibility of the selected node with the known-good node configuration.

Claims

1. For use in a computer network having a plurality of nodes associated therewith, a network management system for maintaining compatibility among said plurality of nodes, comprising:

a polling circuit that retrieves node configuration information from said plurality of nodes; and

a comparison circuit that compares selected node configuration information associated with a first selected one of said plurality of nodes with known-good node configuration information to determine a level of compatibility of said selected node with said known-good node configuration.

2. The network management system as recited in claim 1 wherein said polling circuit retrieves said node configuration information without human intervention.

3. The network management system as recited in claim 1 wherein said comparison circuit detects a change in said first selected node from a first configuration to a second configuration.

4. The network management system as recited in claim 3 wherein said comparison circuit generates an alarm in response to a determination that said change decreases said level of compatibility.

5. The network management system as recited in claim 1 wherein said node configuration information is associated with a configuration of computer hardware devices in said first selected node.

6. The network management system as recited in claim 1 wherein said node configuration information is associated with a configuration of computer software in said first selected node.

7. The network management system as recited in claim 1 wherein said comparison circuit generates a report usable by an operator of said network to modify said first selected node to thereby increase said level of compatibility.

8. The network management system as recited in claim 1 wherein said comparison circuit modifies said first selected node to thereby increase said level of compatibility without human intervention.

9. The network management system as recited in claim 1 wherein said comparison circuit further compares said selected node configuration information associated with said first selected node and selected node configuration information associated with a second selected node with node configuration information associated with a known-good pair of nodes capable of communicating with each another to thereby determine a level of interoperability of said first and second selected nodes.

10. The network management system as recited in claim 9 wherein said comparison circuit generates a report usable by an operator of said network to modify said first and second selected nodes to thereby increase said level of interoperability.

11. The system of claim 1, wherein said comparison circuit includes a formal name table and a manufacturer'"'"'s model table.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein said formal name table includes information representing model number, formal name, location, serial number and said manufacturer'"'"'s model table includes information representing model number, manufacturer'"'"'s name, microprocessor type.

13. The system of claim 1, wherein said comparison circuit can determine a degree of compatibility between two nodes in the computer network.

14. The system of claim 1, wherein said comparison circuit group'"'"'s node configurations into virtual classes and determines if each node configuration is in a virtual class to determine the level of compatibility of selected nodes.

15. The system of claim 1, wherein said comparison circuit includes a comparison engine and a coordination database.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein said coordination database includes a known self-compatibility table including information for computers which are operating properly internally.

17. The system of claim 1, wherein said comparison circuit includes an MIB table.

18. For use in a computer network having a plurality of nodes associated therewith, a method of maintaining compatibility among the plurality of nodes, comprising the steps of:

retrieving node configuration information from the plurality of nodes; and

comparing selected node configuration information associated with a first selected one of the plurality of nodes with known-good node configuration information to determine a level of compatibility of the selected node with the known-good node configuration.

19. The method as recited in claim 18 wherein the step of retrieving the node configuration information is automatically performed by a polling circuit associated with the computer network.

20. The method as recited in claim 18 wherein the step of comparing includes the further step of detecting a change in the first selected node from a first configuration to a second configuration.

21. The method as recited in claim 20 including the further step of generating an alarm in response to a determination that the change decreases the level of compatibility.

22. The method as recited in claim 18 wherein the node configuration information is associated with a configuration of computer hardware devices in the first selected node.

23. The method as recited in claim 18 wherein the node configuration information is associated with a configuration of computer software in the first selected node.

24. The method as recited in claim 18 including the further step of generating a report usable by an operator of the network to modify the first selected node to thereby increase the level of compatibility.

25. The method as recited in claim 18 including the further step of automatically modifying the first selected node to thereby increase the level of compatibility without human intervention.

26. The method as recited in claim 18 wherein the step of comparing includes the further step of comparing the selected node configuration information associated with the first selected node and selected node configuration information associated with a second selected node with node configuration information associated with a known-good pair of nodes capable of communicating with each another to thereby determine a level of interoperability of the first and second selected nodes.

27. The method as recited in claim 26 including the further step of generating a report usable by an operator of the network to modify the first and second selected nodes to thereby increase the level of interoperability.