Impact characterizing deployment control method for an automotive restraint system

• US 5,964,817 A
• Filed: 11/09/1998
• Issued: 10/12/1999
• Est. Priority Date: 11/09/1998
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Aptiv Technologies Limited (Aptiv PLC)
• Original Assignee: Delco Electronics Corporation (Motors Liquidation Co. GUC Trust)
• Inventors: Dalum, Joseph Thomas, Wessels, Gerhard F.
• Primary Examiner(s): Cuchlinski, Jr., William A.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Beaulieu, Yonel
• Application Number:
  US09/188,487
• Time in Patent Office: 337 Days
• Field of Search: 701/45-7, 340/436-8, 340/669, 340/667, 307/10.1, 307/9.1, 280/728.1, 280/734.5, 180/282, 180/271
• US Class Current: 701/45
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 2021/01322 comprising variable thresholds, e.g. depending from other collision parameters
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 21/0132 responsive to vehicle motion parameters , e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 21/01336 using filtering

Abstract

An improved deployment method for a vehicular restraint system having an acceleration sensor and a restraint device to be deployed for occupant protection in a crash event, where a measure of the impact severity based on the difference between the cumulative change in filtered acceleration over a predefined window, and the slope of such cumulative change, is used to characterize the crash event and to adjust the deployment threshold accordingly. Low energy impacts having a soft onset, such as an impact with a gravel pile or a low speed fill frontal impact, will produce a relatively high value of the measure, referred to herein as the Soft Impact Index, or SI Index, in the early progression of the sensed event, whereas high speed impacts that require deployment will produce a relatively low SI Index in the early progression of the event. If the SI Index exceeds a threshold early in the progression of a sensed crash event, an offset is added to the ΔV deployment threshold to reduce the likelihood of deployment, thereby increasing the system immunity to rough road and low velocity impacts. If the SI Index is below the threshold early in the progression of a sensed crash event, an offset is subtracted from the ΔV deployment threshold to provide a more timely deployment of the restraints.

Claims

1. In a vehicular supplemental restraint system having a sensor providing a vehicle acceleration signal, a restraint device and a controller for deploying the restraint device for vehicle occupant protection in a crash event if a measure of crash severity based on the acceleration signal exceeds a threshold, the improvement wherein the controller:

filters the acceleration signal to form a Δ

V signal, and determines a cumulative change in the Δ

V signal over a first predefined interval;

determines an impact index according to a difference between the determined cumulative change in the Δ

V signal and a rate of change of the determined cumulative change over a second predetermined interval in the course of the crash event, the impact index having a predeterminded high value at a predefined progression level of a crash event for which deployment is not desired, and a predeterminded low value at a predefined progression level of a crash event for which deployment is desired;

determines a crash progression level during the crash event based on the acceleration signal; and

compares the determined impact index to an index threshold when the crash progression level has attained the predefined progression level, and adjusts the deployment threshold by an offset amount during the crash event based on the comparison so as to either decrease a likelihood of deployment in a crash event for which deployment is not desired, or provide earlier deployment in a crash event for which deployment is desired.

2. The improvement of claim 1, wherein the controller increases the deployment threshold by the offset amount to decrease the likelihood of deployment when the comparison indicates that the determined impact index exceeds the index threshold.

3. The improvement of claim 2, wherein said offset amount is determined in relation to an amount by which the determined impact index exceeds the index threshold.

4. The improvement of claim 1, wherein the controller decreases the deployment threshold by the offset amount to provide earlier deployment when the comparison indicates that the determined impact index is below the index threshold.

5. The improvement of claim 4, wherein said offset amount is determined in relation to an amount by which the determined impact index is below the index threshold.

6. The improvement of claim 1, wherein said cumulative change in the Δ

V signal is determined according to the expression;

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">Σ

[Δ

V(n-i)-Δ

V(n-x)], for i=0 to x

where w₁ is said first predefined interval, and x is defined as w₁ -1.

7. The improvement of claim 1, wherein said rate of change of the determined cumulative change in the Δ

V signal is determined according to the expression;

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">Δ

Δ

V(n)-Δ

Δ

V(n-y)

where Δ

Δ

V is the cumulative change in filtered acceleration, w₂ is said second predefined interval, and y is defined as w₂ -1.

8. The improvement of claim 1, wherein:

the cumulative change in the Δ

V signal, Δ

Δ

V(n), is determined according to the expression;

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">Σ

[Δ

V(n-i)-Δ

V(n-x)], for i=0 to x

where w₁ is said first predefined interval, and x is defined as w₁ -1;

the rate of change, Δ

Δ

V_slope (n), is determined according to the expression;

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">Δ

Δ

V(n)-Δ

Δ

V(n-y)

where W₂ is said second predefined interval, and y is defined as W₂ -1; and

the impact index is determined according to the expression;

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">|Δ

Δ

V(n)-Δ

Δ

V.sub.slope (n)|.