Vehicle yawing behavior control apparatus

• US 5,964,819 A
• Filed: 06/24/1996
• Issued: 10/12/1999
• Est. Priority Date: 06/22/1995
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
• Original Assignee: Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
• Inventors: Naito, Genpei
• Primary Examiner(s): Mojica, Virna Lissi
• Application Number:
  US08/669,706
• Time in Patent Office: 1,205 Days
• Field of Search: 701/70, 701/72, 701/74, 303/139, 303/140, 303/146, 303/147
• US Class Current: 701/72
• CPC Class Codes: B62D 7/159 characterised by computing methods or stabilisation processes or systems, e.g. responding to yaw rate, lateral wind, load, road condition

Abstract

A vehicle yawing behavior control apparatus for controlling the vehicle behavior to bring the actual vehicle yawing motion into agreement with the calculated target value calculated based on the parameters representing a condition of vehicle movement. At least vehicle yaw rate and slip angle representing an actual value of vehicle yawing motion is detected. When the detected vehicle slip angle is directed outside with respect to the vehicle movement and is greater than a reference slip angle, the calculated target vehicle yawing motion value is corrected outside with respect to the vehicle movement to a greater degree at a greater deviation of the detected vehicle slip angle from the reference slip angle. The reference slip angle is increased as the calculated target vehicle yawing motion value increases.

Claims

1. An apparatus for controlling the yawing behavior of an automotive vehicle supported on a pair of front road wheels and a pair of rear road wheels, comprising:

means for sensing parameters representing a condition of vehicle movement;

means for calculating a target value for vehicle yawing motion based on the sensed parameters;

means for detecting at least vehicle yaw rate and vehicle slip angle representing an actual value of vehicle yawing motion; and

a control unit for controlling the vehicle behavior to bring the actual vehicle yawing motion value into agreement with the calculated target value, the control unit including means for producing a control signal when the detected vehicle slip angle is directed outside with respect to a circle in which the vehicle is turning and is greater than a reference slip angle, means responsive to the control signal for correcting the calculated target vehicle yawing motion value to a greater degree outside with respect to the circle in which the vehicle is turning as a deviation of the detected vehicle slip angle from the reference slip angle increases, and means for increasing the reference slip angle as the calculated target vehicle yawing motion value increases.

2. The vehicle yawing behavior control apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the control unit includes means for setting the reference slip angle Sa* as:

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">Sa*={[LR-(m/2L)(LF/CPR)V.sup.2 ]/V}×

(d/dt)φ

*

where LR is the distance between the rear road wheels and the center of gravity of the vehicle, LF is the distance between the front road wheels and the center of gravity of the vehicle, L is the wheelbase of the vehicle, m is the inertia mass of the vehicle, CPR is the cornering power of the rear road wheels, V is the vehicle speed, and (d/dt)φ

* is the target vehicle yawing motion value.

3. The vehicle yawing behavior control apparatus as claimed in claim 2, wherein the control unit includes:

means for sensing a vehicle speed;

means for sensing a steering wheel angle;

means for sensing a vehicle lateral acceleration;

means for calculating a reference yaw rate based on the sensed steering wheel angle and vehicle speed;

means for calculating a maximum yaw rate based on the sensed lateral acceleration and the vehicle speed;

means for comparing an absolute value of the calculated reference yaw rate with an absolute value of the calculated maximum yaw rate;

means for setting the target yaw rate at the calculated reference yaw rate when the absolute value of the calculated reference value is equal to or greater than the absolute value of the calculated maximum yaw rate and at the calculated maximum yaw rate when the absolute value of the calculated reference value is less than the absolute value of the calculated maximum yaw rate.

4. The vehicle yawing behavior control apparatus as claimed in claim 3, wherein the calculated reference yaw rate increases as the steering wheel angle increases and the vehicle speed decreases.

5. The vehicle yawing behavior control apparatus as claimed in claim 3, wherein the control unit includes:

means for calculating a rear road wheel steer angle based on the deviation of the detected vehicle slip angle from the reference slip angle; and

means for steering the rear road wheels according to the calculated rear road wheel steer angle.

6. The vehicle yawing behavior control apparatus as claimed in claim 5, wherein the calculated rear road wheel steer angle is substantially in direct proportion to the deviation of the detected vehicle slip angle from the reference slip angle.

7. The vehicle yawing behavior control apparatus as claimed in claim 3, wherein the control unit includes:

means for comparing an absolute value of the detected vehicle slip angle with a reference vehicle slip angle value;

means for correcting the target yaw rate from the following equation;

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">(d/dt)φ

*=(d/dt)φ

*1-Ki(|Sa|-Sa*)

where (d/dt)φ

* is the corrected target yaw rate, (d/dt)φ

*1 is the calculated target yaw rate, Ki is a constant, Sa is the detected vehicle slip angle, and Sa* is the reference slip angle.

8. In an apparatus for controlling an automotive vehicle when the vehicle is turning a circle, including yawing behavior control means having a control element positionable in response to a control signal to establish various positions of the vehicle against surrounding circumstances and control unit means for developing the control signal to reduce a deviation of an actual yawing motion value from a target yawing motion value toward zero,

the improvement wherein

the control unit means inputs information of a slip angle of the vehicle and a yaw rate of the vehicle;

the control unit means determines whether the input slip angle indicates that the vehicle moves in a direction outward of the circle in which the vehicle turns;

the control unit means determines whether the input slip angle is greater than a reference slip angle;

the control unit means calculates a deviation of the input slip angle from the reference slip angle;

the control unit means corrects the calculated target yawing motion value at a rate, with respect to time, determined by the calculated deviation and in such a direction as to cause the vehicle to move outward of the circle in which the vehicle turns upon determination that the direction in which the vehicle moves points outward of the circle in which the vehicle turns and that the input slip angle is greater than the reference slip angle; and

the control unit means increases the reference slip angle with an increase in the calculated target yawing motion value.

9. The improvement as claimed in claim 8, wherein

the control unit means stores a control map which specifies various values of a reference yaw rate against various combinations of a vehicle speed of the vehicle and a steering angle;

and

wherein the control unit means calculates a reference yaw rate for a given combination of the vehicle speed and the steering wheel angle.

10. The improvement as claimed in claim 9, wherein

the control unit means calculates a maximum yaw rate as a function of lateral acceleration and vehicle speed;

the control unit means determines whether or not the absolute value of the calculated yaw rate is less than or equal to the absolute value of the calculated maximum yaw rate;

the control unit means sets the target yaw rate at the calculated reference yaw rate after determining that the absolute value of the calculated yaw rate is less than or equal to the absolute value of the calculated maximum yaw rate; and

the control unit means sets the target yaw rate at the calculated maximum yaw rate after determining that the absolute value of the calculated yaw rate is not less than nor equal to the absolute value of the calculated maximum yaw rate.

11. The improvement as claimed in claim 10, wherein

the control unit means calculates a rear road wheel steer angle based on a yaw rate deviation.

12. The improvement as claimed in claim 11, wherein

the control unit means stores a control map which specifies various values of a rear road wheel steer angle against various values of a yaw rate deviation.

13. The improvement as claimed in claim 12, wherein

the control unit means determines an appropriate value of the rear road steer angle against a given value of the yaw rate deviation.

14. The improvement as claimed in claim 13, wherein

the rear road wheel steer angle is proportional to the yaw rate deviation within a window limited by a negative lower limit value and a positive upper limit value;

the rear road wheel steer angle is fixed over various values of the yaw rate deviation greater than the positive upper limit value; and

the rear road wheel steer angle is fixed over various values of the yaw rate deviation less than the negative lower limit value.

15. The improvement as claimed in claim 8, wherein

the control unit means determines whether or not the absolute value of the vehicle slip angle is greater than the reference slip angle;

the control unit means leaves the target yaw rate uncorrected after determining that the absolute value of the vehicle slip angle is not greater than the reference slip angle; and

the control unit means effects the correction of the target yaw rate after determining that the absolute value of the vehicle slip angle is not greater than the reference slip angle.

16. The improvement as claimed in claim 9, wherein, with the vehicle speed unchanged, the reference yaw rate increases with an increase in the steering wheel angle and gradually levels off to reach a predetermined value as the steering wheel angle increases, and the absolute value of the predetermined value decreases as the vehicle speed increases.