Automatic real-time gunshot locator and display system

• US 5,973,998 A
• Filed: 08/01/1997
• Issued: 10/26/1999
• Est. Priority Date: 08/01/1997
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Robert L. Showen, Shotspotter Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Trilon Technology, LLC
• Inventors: Showen, Robert L., Dunham, Jason W.
• Primary Examiner(s): Lobo, Ian J.
• Application Number:
  US08/904,979
• Time in Patent Office: 816 Days
• Field of Search: 367/124, 367/129, 367/906, 367/127, 367/128, 367/907
• US Class Current: 367/124
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 5/0036 of measured values, i.e. measurement on mobile and position calculation on base station
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 5/22 Position of source determined by co-ordinating a plurality of position lines defined by path-difference measurements G01S5/28 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 367/906 Airborne shock-wave detection
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 367/907 Coordinate determination

Abstract

A system to accurately and rapidly present the location of gunfire or other explosive events to dispatchers uses a sparse set of distributed acoustic sensors mounted on rooftops or utility poles to allow triangulation of the gunfire sounds. If a fourth signal confirms that an explosive event occurs at a position triangulated from three other signal, then the system announces an event to dispatchers. The system tests various sensor triads against various criteria and selects the best triad for making the triangulation calculation. In the case where multiple gunshots are present, the system can automatically determine a velocity, thus helping identify and respond to drive-by shootings. The system presents a confirmed location on a computer map of the protected community showing where on a specific property the gunfire occurred. The dispatchers can listen to the event and can view wave forms or spectra to assist in discriminating gunshots from other explosive events. If a dispatcher is confident that a gunshot has been detected, law enforcement officers can be directed to the reported location. A printout of the event is generated so police can later show the event location to the residents and inquire why it occurred there. A history of events is maintained for community problem-solving.

Claims

1. A system for locating a loud explosive event such as gunfire within a region containing explosive events and other weaker impulsive sounds, the system comprising:

a collection of acoustic sensors for detecting acoustic signals, wherein the acoustic sensors have distinct sensor locations within the region, and wherein the average nearest neighbor separation between the sensors is at least 1000 ft., thereby providing spatial filtering of the acoustic signals detected by the sensors; and

a signal processor in communication with the collection of acoustic sensors, wherein the signal processor performs the following steps;

(a) examining the acoustic signals to identify first, second, and third acoustic signals from distinct acoustic sensors, wherein each of the identified acoustic signals has an energy abruptly and significantly rising above an average value of the acoustic signal;

(b) calculating a location in the region by comparing the identified first, second, and third acoustic signals;

whereby intrinsically weak acoustic signals are discriminated against by the large separation between the sensors, thereby improving the performance of the system.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein the location is calculated by a triangulation of the first, second, and third acoustic signals.

3. The system of claim 1 wherein the location is calculated based on angles of arrival of the first, second, and third acoustic signals.

4. The system of claim 1 wherein the examining step comprises comparing the first acoustic signal to a first threshold value and comparing the second and third acoustic signals to a second threshold value lower than the first threshold value.

5. In a system comprising a collection of acoustic sensors in communication with a signal processor, a method for locating a strong explosive event in a region containing explosive and impulsive sounds, the method comprising the steps of:

identifying from among acoustic signals detected by the acoustic sensors a first signal from a first sensor, wherein the first signal exceeds an average noise level by a significant factor;

if a first sharpness value of the first signal exceeds an initial sharpness threshold, then identifying from among the acoustic signals a second signal from a second sensor and a third signal from a third sensor, wherein the first, second, and third sensors are distinct from each other, and wherein the first sharpness value measures a degree to which an energy of the first signal abruptly and significantly rises above an average value; and

if a second sharpness value of the second signal and a third sharpness value of the third signal both exceed a triangulation threshold that is less than the initial sharpness threshold, then calculating from the first, second, and third signals a location.

6. The method of claim 5 further comprising the steps of:

identifying from among the acoustic signals a fourth signal from a fourth sensor distinct from the first, second, and third sensors; and

if a fourth sharpness value of the fourth signal exceeds a confirmation threshold value that is less than the triangulation threshold value, and if an expected arrival time associated with the fourth sensor is within 60 ms of an actual arrival time of the fourth signal, then reporting the calculated location.

7. A system for locating an explosive event within a region, the system comprising:

a collection of acoustic sensors for detecting acoustic signals, wherein the acoustic sensors are positioned at separate sensor locations within the region; and

a signal processor in communication with the collection of acoustic sensors for locating the explosive event from the acoustic signals;

wherein the signal processor performs the following steps;

(a) examining the acoustic signals to identify first, second, and third sharp acoustic signals from distinct acoustic sensors, wherein the identified sharp acoustic signals have energies that rise abruptly and significantly above average values of the signals;

(b) calculating a candidate location in the region by comparing the identified first, second, and third sharp acoustic signals;

(c) examining the acoustic signals to identify a fourth sharp acoustic signal; and

(d) if the fourth sharp acoustic signal was identified in (c) and satisfies a criterion that confirms the calculated candidate location, then reporting the candidate location.

8. The system of claim 7 wherein the first, second, third, and fourth acoustic signals satisfy respective sharpness threshold criteria.

9. The system of claim 7 wherein step (b) comprises comparing arrival times of the first, second, and third acoustic signals at the distinct acoustic sensors, and wherein the confirming criterion is the property of having an arrival time that is within a predetermined interval of an expected arrival time.

10. The system of claim 7 wherein step (b) comprises comparing directions of arrival of the first, second, and third acoustic signals at the distinct acoustic sensors, and wherein the confirming criterion is the property of having a direction of arrival that is within a predetermined interval of an expected direction of arrival.

11. The system of claim 7 wherein the fourth sharp acoustic signal originates from a fourth acoustic sensor distinct from the first, second, and third acoustic sensors.

12. The system of claim 7 wherein the expected arrival time of the fourth sharp acoustic signal corresponds to a time at which the fourth acoustic sensor should have received a signal propagating from the candidate location.

13. The system of claim 7 wherein the sensor locations have an average nearest neighbor separation of at least 1000 feet.

14. The system of claim 7 wherein the acoustic sensors comprise an acoustic sheath to reduce noise due to rain and wind.

15. The system of claim 7 wherein the system further comprises an annunciator selected from the group consisting of an audio alarm and a visual alarm.

16. The system of claim 7 wherein the reporting of the event comprises playing a snippet of a sharp audio signal.

17. The system of claim 7 wherein the system further comprises a video display that indicates on a map of the region the confirmed candidate location.

18. The system of claim 7 wherein the signal processor further performs the step of calculating a sonogram of a sharp audio signal.

19. A system for detecting and locating an explosive event within a region, the system comprising:

a collection of acoustic sensors for detecting acoustic signals, wherein the acoustic sensors are positioned at separate sensor locations within the region; and

a signal processor in communication with the collection of acoustic sensors for identifying and locating the explosive event from the acoustic signals;

wherein the signal processor is programmed in accordance with the following steps;

(a) examining the acoustic signals to identify a first set of three sharp acoustic signals from distinct acoustic sensors, wherein the first set of three sharp acoustic signals correspond to a first candidate gunshot event and have energies that rise abruptly and significantly above average values of the first set of signals;

(b) calculating a first candidate location in the region by comparing the identified first set of three sharp acoustic signals with each other;

(c) examining the acoustic signals to identify a second set of three sharp acoustic signals from distinct acoustic sensors, wherein the second set of three sharp acoustic signals correspond to a second candidate gunshot event and have energies that rise abruptly and significantly above average values of the second set of signals;

(d) calculating a second candidate location in the region by comparing the identified second set of three sharp acoustic signals with each other, and calculating a difference between the first and second candidate locations; and

(e) if the difference between the first candidate location and the second candidate location is less than a predetermined threshold, then reporting a confirmed explosive event.

20. The system of claim 19 wherein the signal processor performs the step of calculating from the difference between the first and second candidate locations a velocity between the first and second candidate gunshot events, whereby a velocity of a drive-by shooting may be determined.

21. A system for detecting and locating an explosive event within a region, the system comprising:

a collection of acoustic sensors for detecting acoustic signals, wherein the acoustic sensors are positioned at separate sensor locations within the region; and

a signal processor in communication with the collection of acoustic sensors for locating the explosive event from the acoustic signals;

wherein the signal processor performs the following steps;

(a) examining the acoustic signals to identify a set of triads, wherein each triad comprises three sharp acoustic signals from distinct acoustic sensors;

(b) identifying for each triad a number of confirming signals from other acoustic sensors;

(c) selecting a best triad from the set of triads, wherein the best triad has a largest number of confirming signals;

(d) calculating a location in the region by comparing the three sharp acoustic signals of the best triad; and

(e) reporting the calculated location.