Bus protocol for atomic transactions

• US 5,987,552 A
• Filed: 01/26/1998
• Issued: 11/16/1999
• Est. Priority Date: 01/26/1998
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Micron Technology, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Intel Corporation
• Inventors: Looi, Lily, Chittor, Suresh, Kapur, Suvansh
• Primary Examiner(s): Ray, Gopal C.
• Application Number:
  US09/013,774
• Time in Patent Office: 659 Days
• Field of Search: 710/128, 710/108, 710/200, 710/112, 710/129, 710/101, 710/107, 710/126, 710/39, 710/36, 710/263, 710/52, 709/100, 709/300, 370/402, 370/412, 395/527, 712/28, 340/825.5
• US Class Current: 710/310
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 13/387 for adaptation of different data processing systems to different peripheral devices, e.g. protocol converters for incompatible systems, open system

Abstract

A method for processing an atomic transaction in a multi-bus system that includes a local bus and a remote bus. According to the method, a first transaction in an atomic sequence is received from the local bus. The first transaction is terminated on the local bus. The first transaction is performed on the remote bus. A response to the first transaction is received and the response is placed on the local bus.

Claims

1. In a multi-bus computer system, having a local bus and a remote bus, a method of processing an atomic transaction posted on the local bus, comprising:

receiving a first transaction in an atomic sequence,

terminating the first transaction on the local bus,

performing the first transaction on the remote bus,

receiving a response to the first transaction, and

placing the response on the local bus.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising a step of, coincident with the performing step, isolating the local bus from the remote bus.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the terminating step includes generating a RETRY signal on the local bus in response to the first transaction.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the terminating step includes generating a DEFER signal on the local bus in response to the first transaction.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising a step of coincident with the second receiving step, isolating the remote bus from the local bus.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising, subsequent to the placing step, receiving and performing all subsequent transactions in the atomic sequence.

7. In a multi-bus computer system, having a local bus and a plurality of remote buses, a method of processing an atomic transaction posted on the local bus, comprising:

receiving a first transaction in an atomic sequence, the first transaction being directed to one of the remote buses,

terminating the first transaction on the local bus,

performing the first transaction on the one remote bus,

isolating the local bus from the remote bus,

receiving a response to the first transaction,

isolating the other remote buses from the local bus, and

placing the response on the local bus.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the first isolating step includes a step of, when a new transaction directed to any remote bus is posted on the local bus, terminating the new transaction.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein the second isolating step includes a step of, when a new transaction directed to the local bus is posted on any remote bus, terminating the new transaction.

10. The method of claim 7, wherein the terminating step includes generating a RETRY signal on the local bus in response to the first transaction.

11. The method of claim 7, wherein the terminating step includes generating a DEFER signal on the local bus in response to the first transaction.

12. In a multi-bus computer system that includes a local bus, an intermediate bus and a remote bus, a method of processing an atomic transaction in a local bridging agent that interfaces to the local bus and the intermediate bus, comprising:

receiving from the local bus a first transaction in an atomic sequence, the first transaction directed to the remote bus,

terminating the first transaction on the local bus,

placing the first transaction on the intermediate bus,

receiving a response to the first transaction from the intermediate bus, and

placing the response on the local bus.

13. The method of claim 12, further comprising a step of, coincident with the terminating step, isolating the local bus from the remote bus.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the isolating step includes a step of, when any new transaction directed to the remote bus is posted on the local bus, terminating the new transaction.

15. The method of claim 12, further comprising steps of, without interruption:

receiving subsequent transactions in the atomic sequence from the local bus,

placing the subsequent transaction on the intermediate bus,

receiving responses to the subsequent transaction from the intermediate bus, and

placing the responses on the local bus.

16. The method of claim 12, wherein the terminating step includes generating a RETRY signal on the local bus in response to the first transaction.

17. The method of claim 12, wherein the terminating step includes generating a DEFER signal on the local bus in response to the first transaction.

18. In a multi-bus computer system that includes a local bus, an intermediate bus and a remote bus, a method of processing an atomic transaction in a remote bridging agent that interfaces to the intermediate bus and the remote bus, comprising:

receiving from the intermediate bus a request corresponding to a first transaction in an atomic sequence,

placing the request on the remote bus,

receiving a response to the request from the remote bus,

isolating the remote bus from the intermediate bus, and

placing the response on the intermediate bus.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the remote bridging agent interfaces to a plurality of remote buses and the isolating step includes a step of isolating all remote buses from the intermediate bus.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein the isolating step includes a step of, for any new transaction posted on the remote bus that is directed to the local bus, terminating the transaction.

21. A local bridging agent coupled to a local bus and to an intermediate bus, comprising:

a local bus interface coupled to the local bus,

a local interface controller in communication with the local bus interface,

an intermediate bus interface coupled to the intermediate bus,

an inbound transaction queue in communication with the local bus interface and the intermediate bus interface,

an outbound transaction queue in communication with the local bus interface and the intermediate bus interface,

wherein, responsive to a first transaction in an atomic sequence;

the local interface controller enters a first state wherein it causes the local bus interface to generate a response on the local bus terminating the first transaction and every other remote transaction posted on the local bus subsequent to the first transaction,

the first transaction is queued in the outbound transaction queue,

when the first transaction advances out of the outbound transaction queue, the intermediate bus interface posts it on the intermediate bus,

the intermediate bus interface receives a response to the first transaction,

the response is queued in the inbound transaction queue,

when the response advances out of the inbound transaction queue, the local interface controller enters a second state wherein, when the first transaction is retried, it causes the local bus interface to place the response on the local bus.

22. The local bridging agent of claim 21, wherein when the response is posted on the local bus, the local interface controller enters a third state wherein it permits transactions directed to remote buses to be posted on the local bus.

23. The local bridging agent of claim 21, the agent further comprising a second intermediate bus interface coupled to a second intermediate bus, wherein, when the response is received at the first intermediate bus, the second intermediate bus interface locks the second intermediate bus from the local bus.

24. A remote bridging agent coupled to an intermediate bus and a remote bus, comprising:

an intermediate bus interface coupled to the intermediate bus,

a remote bus interface coupled to the remote bus, the remote bus interface including a remote bus controller,

an outbound transaction queue coupled to the intermediate bus interface and the remote bus interface,

an inbound transaction queue coupled to the intermediate bus interface and the remote bus interface,

wherein, responsive to a request from the intermediate bus corresponding to a first transaction in an atomic sequence;

the intermediate bus interface queues the request in the outbound transaction queue,

when the request advances out of the outbound transaction queue, the remote bus interface posts the request on the remote bus,

the remote bus interface receives a response to the request and queues it in the inbound transaction queue,

responsive to the response, the remote bus controller locking the remote bus from the intermediate bus,

when the response advances out of the inbound transaction queue, the intermediate bus interfaces posts the response on the intermediate bus.

25. The remote bridging agent of claim 24, further comprising a remote request retry buffer coupled to the remote bus interface, that stores other requests to be retried on the remote bus, wherein, when the request is posted on the remote bus, the remote bus controller stalls the remote request retry buffer.

26. In a multi-bus system including a local bus, an intermediate bus and a remote bus, the system further including a local bridging agent interfacing the local bus to the intermediate bus and a remote bridging agent interfacing the intermediate bus to the remote bus, a method of implementing a lockout initiated by an agent on the remote bus, comprising:

receiving a lockout request from the intermediate bus,

decoding the lockout request,

isolating the local bus from the remote bus, and

posting a response on the intermediate bus indicating that the lockout request is granted.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein the isolating step includes a step of, when a transaction is posted on the local bus and directed to the agent on the remote bus, terminating the transaction.

28. The method of claim 26, wherein the isolating step includes a step of, when a transaction is posted on the remote bus and directed to the agent on the remote bus, terminating the transaction.